Issues & Insights
body of water during golden hour
Photo by Sebastian Voortman on Pexels.com

Another Crack Appears In The Global Warming Narrative

Editor’s note: We expected the leftist thought police at Google would declare that this editorial was “unreliable” and “harmful— because it blasphemes the climate religion — and strip its AdSense ads from the page. And we were right! (See below.)

This is why we mounted our Kill the Ads campaign. It’s our small way of trying to stick it to Big Tech. Readers can help counter attempts to suppress our speech with a direct donation to I&I.

Al Gore famously warned that sea level rise caused by man’s use of fossil fuels was going to kill us. Barack Obama implied that he had magic powers that would control surging sea levels. A fresh study shows just how dishonest this pair and the many others who did their best to misinform the public have been.

Gore’s 2006 propaganda film told us to beware of sea levels rising by 20 feet, devastating New York and Florida. The uber-narcissistic Obama promised an adoring crowd that his nomination to be the Democratic Party’s 2008 presidential nominee “was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.” California Gov. Jerry Brown predicted a little more than a decade ago that collapsing glaciers would submerge both the Los Angeles and San Francisco international airports.

These of course are just three of many examples of alarmists, hacks, globalist busybodies, NASA eggheads, academic ideologues and true believers fear-mongering over sea-level rise.

Obama, no climate refugee he, was later roasted for buying oceanfront compounds in Martha’s Vineyard and Hawaii. The purchases clearly show he didn’t believe what he said – he was just another political hack appealing for votes and hoping to burnish a legacy before he even set foot in the White House.

But how can we know it’s just fear-mongering?

Actual science, not Gore’s junk variety, now tells us that “approximately 95% of the suitable locations” researchers looked at showed “no statistically significant acceleration of the rate of sea level rise.” This “suggests that local, non-climatic phenomena are a plausible cause of the accelerated sea level rise observed at the remaining 5% of the suitable locations.”

“On average,” the European paper says, “the rate of rise projected by the IPCC is biased upward with approximately 2 mm per year in comparison with the observed rate.”

As it turns out:

The majority of the local causes of rapid sea level rise (or drop) appear to be geologic. Tectonic motion explains sudden changes of sea level rise found in a few places. More gradual but rapid rise (or fall) of sea level is mostly caused by glacial isostatic adjustment and in a few isolated cases by an excessive sediment load.

What else do we know about the oceans? It’s been well established that sea levels, like Earth’s climate, have been constantly changing without any human influence.

We acknowledge that we live in an era of rising sea levels, just as we live in a time in which we are escaping the lower temperatures of the Little Ice Age that lasted until the late 19th century, if not, according to some researchers, the early 20th century. But the rise we’re seeing is slow, not remotely catastrophic, and not outside of historical norms (even though the hysterics continue to claim the rise is “accelerating” and is “unprecedented”).

The climate cranks, warming crackpots, and those possessed of Marxphilia won’t be deterred by this or any other scientific evidence. But it’s news that can help persuade larger swaths of voters that the global warming scare is a con. As more Americans learn the truth, the radicals and zealots who perpetuate the fiction will fade into the oblivion they deserve.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

8 comments

  • Since this report was authored by scientist picked by the Trump administration it will be instantly dismissed as propaganda by deniers. Those who need some high percentage of the population to continue to believe include leftist politicians, wind farm proposals and the companies making the wind turbines and their entire support structure. Solar panel companies, EV manufacturers and those who live by the Climate Change support from governments world wide.

    They will not go easily, quietly or neatly. It will be messy, loud and angry.

  • I don’t believe that Obama and Gore were being dishonest so much as being true believers.

    • Mr. Simon, If Obama was a true believe, why did he buy ocean-front property?
      I don’t even believe Gore believed his global warming warning. He helped make the market for his CO2 scam. Additionally I think he got on the climate bandwagon because he thought it would leverage him into the White House.

    • When Gore tried to pretend the NYC hurricane was proof of his prediciton NYC would be under water, he became a liar

  • The IPC detailed reports from a couple decades ago indicated that sea levels have been rising 2mm/year (on avg) since the end of the last ice age 10,000 years ago. This new report confirms nothing has changed with respect to sea levels.

    Can humans damage the environment? Of course. I give you Lake Erie, Los Angeles air quality in the 60’s and East German lakes after the fall of the USSR. But we can also heal the planet. I give you the same places as examples.

    There are real human-caused environmental calamities. MTBE additives in fuel cause cancer. Introduction of invasive species in the Everglades. Heavy metals and plastics dumped in the ocean. And we can fix those.

    But climate change is primarily human caused? A warming earth is by definition ‘bad’ (when it actually greens the world)? CO2 (exhaling) and passing gas are killing the planet? Give me a break.

  • Just a country boy but if the solid portion of the earth is cooling like the rest of the universe, wouldn’t it be contracting? That would explain how the pressure and temperature stay so high…

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading