Issues & Insights

It’s The Culture Of The IRS To Target The Most Vulnerable Taxpayers

President Joe Biden signed the inappropriately named “Inflation Reduction Act” last Friday. Aside from the fact that even non-partisan analyses show the bill will have a negligible impact on actual inflation, one specific provision is raising red flags. In the plan, the Internal Revenue Service gets a fresh $80 billion in funding, with $45.6 billion of that slated for “enforcement” measures. This will involve the hiring of more than 87,000 new IRS agents. If past is prologue, it’s reasonable to expect this spells bad news for lower-income Americans.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates this new investment in the IRS will generate an additional $203.7 billion over the next 10 years. A sum that large certainly casts doubt on the notion that this will only impact the super-wealthy.  It is especially concerning given the agency’s rates of audits across socio-economic classes in recent years.

According to IRS audit data, the most frequently audited county in the United States is Humphreys County, Mississippi. This rural county near the Mississippi Delta is known for catfish farming and has an average income of $18,000 per resident, making it among the poorest in the nation. Yet, Humphreys’ residents get audited far more often than those in cities such as New York, Chicago, or Los Angeles.

IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig sent a letter to the Senate last week, assuring lawmakers that this added funding will not be used to target the less financially well off. In the letter, Rettig says, “These resources are absolutely not about increasing audit scrutiny on small businesses or middle-income Americans … Audit rates will not rise relative to recent years for households making under $400,000.” This echoes the administration’s prior tax promises made to the American people.

However, this is a distinct tone shift for Rettig. In 2019, he testified before Congress and was asked about the disproportionate targeting of poorer Americans for audit scrutiny. He answered bluntly, “[This is] the most efficient use of available IRS examination resources.” He would later justify this by explaining that poorer Americans from disadvantaged communities are easier to audit because they themselves do not have the resources to fight back. Thus, they require less time and money on the part of the IRS.

This trend is not isolated to Humphreys County, of course. In fact, looking at a heat map of the U.S. counties with the most people living in poverty and a map of the counties that have the most audits per capita, you’ll find they’re almost identical. In 2015, when the IRS began scaling back its audits, rates dropped by 75% for earners making more than $1 million. On the other hand, that number only dropped 33% for moderate-to-low income filers. It is in the culture of the IRS to target the most vulnerable in our nation.

The numbers indicate this trend will continue. The aforementioned $203.7 billion in extra revenue will no doubt be at least partly pulled from lower-earning Americans. In fact, data from the Joint Committee on Taxation shows that the average federal tax burden will increase for every American making more than $30,000 per year as a result of the legislation.

Also, America has no more than 1,000 billionaires within its borders. The highest estimates place the number around 927 U.S. billionaires. There is no doubt that the 87,000 new IRS agents will not be focused solely on the affairs of these select few. For perspective, these agents would not be able to fit in any single NFL stadium – though they’d likely be able to extort the money to pay for all the tickets. This is an army of auditors that will come for Americans of all income levels.

The IRS has demonstrated numerous times that when the going gets tough, it goes for the path of least resistance. For its agents, that path is taking advantage of Americans who can least afford it. With this clear pattern of behavior over years, the IRS needs reform and to be dramatically scaled back. Instead, the Inflation Reduction Act rewards it with more money and more manpower. It will be these same vulnerable Americans who pay the price.

Dan Savickas is the director of tech policy at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.



  • Super-sizing the IRS is not really about money. It is about the DNC’s quest for absolute power. Financial control is a powerful tool, up there with weaponizing the DOJ and FBI. Talking about effects on lower income Americans, while important, beggars the larger questions. For example: Are there better uses for $80 billion than doubling the IRS? If your real goal is absolute political power, then putting the IRS on steroids makes total sense. Remember, Biden also wanted banks to report to the IRS every transaction of $600 or more. Expect that to comeback as an executive order or as part of a larger bill that no one reads until too late. Money and the IRS are pretexts for expanding DNC power. Like in communist China, where people get a positive “social score” and benefits for “right” spending (versus losing points for “wrong” spending).

    The IRS is a logical choice as a financial database for the DNC to monitor and regulate or control peoples’ behavior. Put the numbers into context: Spending $80 billion to gain $200 billion means little to a government with $30 trillion in debt. With far less than $80 billion, you could quickly build the XL- and other pipelines to dramatically lower energy costs that ripple through the economy causing high inflation. That would be real inflation reduction. Leaving $80 billion in the hands of people and corporations could have a 10x multiplier effect, meaning it could produce $800 billion in economic growth. Taxing that increased wealth at 20% would produce $160 billion in tax revenue per year, making it a better investment than putting the money into expanding the IRS. But super-sizing the IRS was never really about money.

  • Every government agency will prosecute/persecute the weakest. Eg. the police will send 2 cars of officers plus a crime incident van to arrest someone for tweeting /retweeting a comment about LGBTQ on an anonymous complaint of “hurt feelings” while ignoring violent assaults, burglaries and child abuse, in case they are a) injured or b ) sued by a suspect with more influence/ political connections. The government itself, while trumpeting about “equity ” will grind the poor, ethnic minorities and all opposition into the ground. Justice is as two tiered as medical care. This folks, is the modern Progressive face of “government by the people for the people ” Right ?

  • Just make sure you hang on to that wonderful Second Amendment, Cousins!
    Looks like you’re going to need it.
    I wish we had the equivalent this side of the Pond…

  • The IRS will target republicans first and independents second. The goal is to reduce or eliminate any voter who doesn’t vote democrat.

  • With ACA(Obamacare} the wall between our health info and tax information evaporated. These net agents have one-stop access to every persons finance and tax data. There are limitless uses. As Dans noted IRS preys on weak prey to make easy wins. So, just find the folks on antidepressants. Audit them. Find folks with cancer. Audit them. Find folks that see psychiatrists. Audit them. There are lots of easy prey when one includes health conditions and status. They have a data trove and need more people. Makes it clear how the administration and IRS view the citizens of this country, and the view is not pretty.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!