Issues & Insights
Capitol, Jan. 6, 2021. Photo: Tyler Merbler. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en).

Americans See Jan. 6 Hearings As Politically Biased And Anti-Trump: I&I/TIPP Poll

The Jan. 6 hearings mark the third major investigation into former President Donald Trump’s time in office. To many people, in particular Republicans, these investigations have looked suspiciously politicized, especially the most recent hearings. What’s surprising is that a large share of Democrats agree, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll results show.

Republicans have been front and center in criticizing the Jan. 6 hearings as little more than a political circus intended to besmirch Trump.

Even the makeup of the “bipartisan” committee has come in for ridicule, since the two GOP members of the nine-member panel were handpicked by the Democrats — contrary to the common practice of having a party select its own representatives. This wasn’t helped by the fact that the two GOP members, Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney and Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, are both vociferous critics of Trump and voted for his impeachment.

But is the deck really stacked against the controversial former president? Republicans give a resounding “yes.” But most surprising of all, many, if not most, Democrats agree.

In the July 2022 online I&I/TIPP Poll, we asked 1,643 adults across the country whether they agreed with the following two statements:

  1. “Some say that the Jan. 6 committee was handpicked and represents only Democrats’ points of view.”
  2. “Some say that the Jan. 6 committee’s main aim is to ensure President Trump can’t run in 2024.”

For the first statement, a clear plurality of 46% agreed that the Jan. 6 panel had been “handpicked” to represent Democrats views, versus 35% who disagreed.

But the political breakdown for the poll, which has a margin of error of +/-2.5 percentage points, gets interesting.

No shock that Republicans agree with the statement overwhelmingly, by 64% (agree) to 22% (disagree). But even among Democrats, 43% agreed the Jan. 6 committee shows a pro-Democrat bias, versus 44% who disagreed. That’s within the poll’s margin of error.

Independents were likewise evenly split, 38% to 38%.

Adding further intrigue to the numbers, white and black/hispanic groups were surprisingly close. For white Americans, 45% agreed, 38% disagreed. For blacks/hispanics, it was 50% to 29%.

One major gap did show in the data: gender. Men agreed by 54% to 33% the panel favors Democrats, while for women, it was nearly split in two, at 39% agree to 37% disagree.

The second statement, that the Jan. 6 investigation’s “main aim” is to keep Trump from running again in 2024 showed 60% agreed while just 27% disagreed.

Even more eye-opening was this finding: 62% of Democrats agree the main purpose is to keep Trump from running in 2024, vs. just 28% who disagree. That’s only slightly less than the 70% to 18% for Republicans.

Independents are more skeptical, but even among their ranks a plurality of 48% agreed, while 34% disagreed. And they were the only group of the more than 21 demographic categories the I&I/TIPP Poll follows that was below 50%. Every other category had a majority, liberal-left, black-white-hispanic, north-south-east-west, male-female, you name it.

These findings suggest, at very least, a high degree of skepticism over the Jan. 6 proceedings among the general public, regardless of party or political conviction.

This is not idle speculation, but based rather on an earlier I&I/TIPP Poll taken in June that showed 44% of Americans felt “confident” the Jan. 6 Commission would make a “genuine effort to uncover the truth,” compared to 40% that said it wouldn’t. 15% described themselves as “unsure.”

At minimum, the public appears to be highly dubious of the Jan. 6 panel, and no doubt any results will be viewed by a significant share of voters, whether Democrat, Republican or independent, as politically tainted and biased against Trump.

One witness’ appearance before the Jan. 6 congressional hearings underscores why the public’s skepticism over the panel’s motives might be growing.

Cassidy Hutchinson, a former top aide to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified under oath that Trump got violent with his own security detail and at one point “lunged” at the steering wheel to gain control of his Secret Service car so he could join the rioters at the Capitol.

That second-hand testimony, hailed by the mainstream media as a “bombshell” revelation, later was called into question, with the two supposed Secret Service sources for Hutchinson’s tale saying they were “willing to testify under oath to dispute Hutchinson’s narrative.”

Further, the Jan. 6 committee tweeted: “Today’s testimony makes clear that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol with the armed mob, despite warnings not to do so from his advisors testimony discussed the hard-core Trump supporters demonstrating that day as an “armed mob”

As American Greatness writer Julie Kelly observed: “Out of hundreds of thousands of Trump supporters in Washington, D.C. and a few thousand who then walked to the Capitol, only six have been charged for possessing firearms — and one left his guns in his vehicle.”

Though raucous and at times violent, that is hardly an “armed mob.”

Nor have the panel’s bona fides been bolstered by the admission of Rep. Cheney on CBS’ “Face The Nation” as to what the Jan. 6 Commission’s real job is: “I can tell you that the single most important thing … is to ensure that Donald Trump is not the Republican nominee and that he certainly is not anywhere close to the Oval Office ever again.”

As the I&I/TIPP results indicate, Americans of all political parties do not like the nation’s judiciary and congressional investigatory apparatus to be used for political ends. Whether the Jan. 6 Commission members know it or not, that’s how they’re viewed.

I&I/TIPP publishes polling data each month on this topic and others of public interest. TIPP’s reputation for excellence comes from being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill O’Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTV’s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

11 comments

  • Of course they do. That is what happens when folks are turned into partisan sheep by the media and academia. The guy is a crook. Its pretty simple. A banana republic charlatan

    • And you can add every single Democrat to the list of charlatans. THEY are crooked. THEY spied on Trump before and after he became president. Obama is a crook. Hillary is a crook, and Biden and son are extreme crooks. Good luck.

  • The left has jumped the shark on this issue and it will take them down.

  • If you had to take a poll to answer that question, you weren’t paying attention.

    Stalin is so proud of our Democrats!

  • Umm…
    Your polling questions are clearly designed to elicit the response you seek…
    We’re not all idiot Republicans.

    • The questions are actually biased towards your side, not against. Imagine asking people’s opinions about simple factual questions, like whether or not the Committee was handpicked. All Committee members were selected by Democrats, that’s not a matter of opinion.

      If you read the article, Cheney admitted openly on Face the Nation that election tampering was the point of the committee. I can’t imagine why she’d admit it, but her admission seems to settle the matter. For that matter, I can’t imagine why you’d admit that your definition of idiocy was questioning your own side. If thinking is stupid, not thinking must therefore be smart. Quite Orwellian, that.

  • The January 6th hearings are just an attempt to tamper with the 2024 Election. They admitted that openly during the 2nd impeachment, when they said that they had to do it to keep him from running again.

    The problem is they also admit that what they’re doing is wrong. That was the basis of the first impeachment, if you’ll recall, the idea that trying to investigate Biden for a crime he had actually confessed to (threatening to withhold aid money unless he got a favor) was wrong because he was a Presidential Candidate and investigating him was election tampering. So it is here too.

    Most disturbing is that Trump has already been exonerated for this crime in the second impeachment. The regular Police never considered him so much as a Person of Interest. The January 6th Committee has spent a year looking for evidence they claimed they already had when they impeached. Obviously they didn’t have it at that time, making the 2nd impeachment rather illegitimate.

    The Committee ostensibly exists to investigate the causes of the riots, but has proven to be totally disinterested in angles that don’t further the goal of election tampering. Questions like why National Guard backup was rejected even though they knew there was going to be trouble have gone entirely unasked because they don’t further the goal.

    The makeup of the committee is entirely partisan. No one who doesn’t agree with the chosen narrative is there to keep things honest. As a result, witnesses feel free to claim anything,sure that they won’t be prosecuted for perjury if it isn’t true. If one claimant says Trump shoved a Secret Service agent, but the Secret Service itself says it didn’t happen, that’s no problem. We just won’t call the Secret Service agents as witnesses. What fair minded person could possibly take all this seriously?

  • If you asked if people agreed with the following two statements this is the dumbest poll I’ve ever seen.

    “Some say that the Jan. 6 committee was handpicked and represents only Democrats’ points of view.”

    “Some say that the Jan. 6 committee’s main aim is to ensure President Trump can’t run in 2024.”

    Yes, I agree that “some say that.” Some very ignorant people say that but some do. I agree with both those statements but I also believe Trump attempted a coup even if it was a pathetic attempt. Hopefully he spends the rest of his life in prison.

  • Nearly all of the people testifying before the J6 committee are card-carrying Republicans. Many were part of Trump’s team while in office. Not a RINO among them. All voters should reflect on that fact before concluding there’s any political bias going on.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar image above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
Share
%d bloggers like this: