Terry JonesAmericans are clearly torn over artificial intelligence and the electricity-hungry data centers now being built around the country that make it all possible. As the latest I&I/TIPP Poll shows, voters are at best ambivalent about the giant AI high-tech transformation, and worry about its impact on energy costs and their household budgets.
In its latest survey, the national online I&I/TIPP Poll began by asking 1,463 voters: “How concerned are you that your household’s electricity bills will increase over the next 12 months?”
In something of a landslide, a hefty 75% majority overall responded that they would be either “very” concerned (41%) or “somewhat” concerned (34%), while just 20% said they would either be “not very” concerned (14%) or “not concerned at all” (7%).
The August I&I/TIPP Poll was taken from July 28 through Aug. 1 and has a margin of error of +/- 2.9 percentage points.
Among Democrats (79% concerned), Republicans (73% concerned) and independents (72% concerned), there was extremely high agreement. Indeed, not one of the 36 demographic groups I&I/TIPP tracks were below 70% “concerned.” Those “not concerned” formed only a small minority in all groups.
A follow-on question queried: “If a large data center were built near your community, which potential impact would concern you the most?”
On this question, six responses were possible.
Among those, 37% answered “higher electricity costs,” while another 21% went with “greater demand on the electrical grid” as their answer. Just 13% worried over “increased water use,” while a slightly larger 14% cited “noise and environmental impacts,” and only 7% said they had “few or no environmental concerns.
Once again, political persuasion mattered little: Though numbers weren’t identical, they were bunched closely together. And the two responses about America’s ability to continue producing low-cost electricity without straining the national grid accounted for 58%. It’s very much on all Americans’ minds now.
As a third question, participants were asked: “If you had to choose, which should be the higher national priority?”
This question provided three possible answers, with 27% selecting “Maintaining America’s leadership in artificial intelligence,” but a 59% majority favoring “Limiting the impact of new data centers on electricity, water, and local communities.” Another 14% said they were not sure.
As noted, the AI/data center controversy is one of a small handful of issues on which a majority each of the three major political groupings — Democrats, Republicans, independents — agree.
Among Democrats, only 21% thought “maintaining America’s leadership” in AI should be a priority, while 67% wanted to “limit the impact” of data centers, and 12% weren’t sure. For independents, a slightly higher 26% wanted to back U.S. AI leadership, but 58% wanted to limit data center impacts and 16% were not sure.
And Republicans largely agreed, with 36% wanting to maintain U.S. AI leadership, but a majority of 53% in favor of limiting local impacts. Just 11% were not sure.
A fourth question asked respondents the best ways to meet growing electricity demand: “As demand for electricity from data centers grows, what should America do first?”
The number one answer at 26%: “Improve energy efficiency to reduce demand.”
“Expand renewable electricity generation” and “Slow construction of new data centers until the electric grid catches up” were in a statistical tie, each at 24%.
The least popular response? “Build more electricity generation,” with just 13% support. That 13% was also the same percentage who said “not sure.”
Democrats, Republicans and independents were not far apart in their responses, though there were some differences. Among Republicans, 29% favored “improve energy efficiency,” while Dems (26%) and indie voters (25%) were slightly lower.
Using more renewables was most popular with Democrats (29%), less so with Republicans (23%) and independents (21%). That pattern held, too, for “slow construction of new data centers,” which received support from 26% of Democrats, 25% of independents, and 21% of Republicans.
“Build more” power plants got strongest backing from Republicans at 18%, but found just 7% with Democrats and 15% with independents. Among the policy options, it is the least popular.
A final poll question asks: “If America needs substantially more electricity to support artificial intelligence and data centers, which energy source should provide the largest share of that additional electricity?”
The big winner? Solar power, with 28% support, followed by nuclear power (16%), natural gas (12%), and wind power (10%). But No. 2 response, with 19% backing, wasn’t any kind of energy at all, but rather: “America should slow the growth of data centers instead.”
No question about it: Americans are very wary of artificial intelligence and the data centers being built to make AI possible. The same thing happened in the 1980s, when personal computers first emerged and initially cost jobs in some areas, but soon boosted employment overall.
Data centers have been vilified by politicians on the far left, including Vermont’s socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, who claims data centers and AI will have a “catastrophic impact” on average Americans, while New York Democratic Socialist Rep. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez charges they are a source of “existential harm” to working people.
And, as the I&I/TIPP Poll clearly shows, the nearly non-stop anti-AI/data center campaign by the Democratic Party, has had a negative impact on how its viewed by average Americans. What Americans don’t know is that much of that opposition is funded in part by foreign governments, including China. These groups have “delayed, blocked, or scaled back approximately $23.6 billion in proposed U.S. AI data center investment,” the Bitcoin Institute study shows.
Even so, Americans fear that data centers will consume vast amounts of electricity, driving up energy costs to consumers, while ruining local economies.
But do people really understand data centers? Maybe not. They might not know it, but they’re already heavily dependent on data centers and AI. There’s no going back, unless we want to cede leadership to China, India and a growing number of others seeking to control AI’s destiny, for good or for ill.
Data centers are already a big part of our economy. And the data center industry is growing rapidly.
A 2026 report by global accounting and consulting firm PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) found that data centers already employ more than a million people (and it’s growing fast). And each one of those jobs supports 4.5 jobs elsewhere. In just two years — 2023 and 2024 — they boosted GDP by $1.7 trillion and added $369 billion to federal, state and local taxes.
“Without data centers, this country’s roughly 315 million smart phones would be — well, dumb phones,” adds IndustryWeek Magazine. “Data centers are, effectively, the backbone of our digital economy, supporting cloud storage, streaming media, modern communications, and online game servers. And with the rise of AI, they will become even more essential.”
Newer data centers are being built with their own power supplies, just like Elon Musk’s. And new data centers also don’t waste water: They recycle all the water they use. It is, of course, proper to ensure that new data centers don’t damage local communities, that they pay for or supply their own energy, and that they mitigate noise pollution.
As the August I&I/TIPP Poll clearly shows, many Americans believe that the AI and data center industries are a problem. Indeed, like all new growth industries, they pose challenges for local communities. But as recent studies also strongly suggest, Americans’ lives will likely be far better, not worse, thanks to the beneficial impact that AI and data centers will have on the overall economy.
I&I/TIPP publishes timely, unique, and informative data each month on topics of public interest. TIPP’s reputation for polling excellence comes from being the most accurate pollster for the past six presidential elections.
Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.
Support Independent Journalism
Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.
We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left.
We are 100% reader supported!!
If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.
And be sure to tell your friends!
I’m wondering how much China is trying to influence us…
You wrote that TIPP surveyed “Voters” but the images you show all have footnotes saying it was “1,463 Adults” and it was an online survey. If it was actually “Voters”, or better yet, “Likely Voters” or people who regularly vote, it’d have more heft. Your larger argument that America is being subjected to an “op” by foreign and domestic actors is spot-on. That’s the real story.
The simple solution is to have the AI center supply their own electricity. They can build their own power source nearby, for their own use.
If feasible, they can sell any extra electricity to the local utility at a fair price… When needed.
Have any of these fears actually been born out? It’s amazing how influential the CCP is here! The US citizens have turned into rats lured by the Pied Piper’s flute. I do not understand why these people cannot see that by sliding these Data Centers that they are helping our enemies. If someone wanted to build some other industry in, they wouldn’t react this way. What had happened to us (US)?
Innovation is one of the best ways to alleviate energy needs and fears of Data Centers. Recall that it was the invention of catalytic converters for cars and trucks which substantially reduced smog in our cities. We need the next great invention to improve and reduce the energy and water needs of the Data Centers, and that invention will come soon; inventions always do.
Anyone heard from Bjorn Lomborg, a level head if ever there has been one, on this subject? What say you, Bjorn?
But, right now, we must buttress against and suppress the misdirected and naive foolishness of the Bernie Sanders dinosaurs, the barely educated AOC sophomores, and others who worship the far out and exceedingly unAmerican mantra of the DSA, against the strengths, protections and betterment of our own country.