Issues & Insights

Still More Dem Lies About Obamacare

I&I Editorial

Democrats have spent the bulk of the Amy Coney Barrett hearings warning that she would overturn Obamacare if she makes it to the Supreme Court, causing 130 million Americans to lose protections for preexisting conditions and costs to skyrocket.

None of that is true. But then again, Obamacare was built on a Big Lie – “you can keep your plan.”

On Monday, Joe Biden warned that “This nominee has said she wants to get rid of the Affordable Care Act. … This is about less than one month (until) Americans are going to lose their health insurance.”

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I.,  used his time at Judge Barrett’s confirmation hearings to spin a bizarre conspiracy theory in which “big donors” are trying to eliminate Obamacare by “stacking” the courts with conservative judges.

The truth is that the really “big donors” who care about Obamacare’s future are supporting Biden. Big Pharma, for example, gave more to Biden’s campaign this year than Trump’s. Hospitals and nursing home donations are running 2-to-1 in Biden’s favor. The health care sector overall has given $20 million to Biden, but only $11 million to Trump, according to Open Secrets.

But the lies go much deeper than that. First, the notion that a Justice Barrett is certain to vote to overturn all of Obamacare is false. Biden simply made up the claim that she “wants to get rid of the Affordable Care Act.” What Barrett has said was that Chief Justice John Roberts shouldn’t have rewritten the statute to turn the individual insurance mandate penalty (which most of the justices viewed as unconstitutional) into a tax penalty.


See Also: Democrats Can’t Stop Lying About Obamacare


“He construed the penalty imposed on those without health insurance as a tax, which permitted him to sustain the statute as a valid exercise of the taxing power,” Barrett wrote.

But she’s never said she wants to get rid of the law. And the case heading to the Supreme Court could result in the mandate (which is no longer enforced) being stripped from the law, while the rest of it remains. In other words, nothing about Obamacare would change.

Democrats also used Barrett’s nomination to trot out another Big Lie about Obamacare. Namely, that without it 133 million would risk losing access to health care because of preexisting conditions.

That figure comes from an Obama administration report that found that – at most – 133 million people under age 65 have health conditions that could cause insurance companies to charge them more or deny them coverage. At the low end, it’s 51 million.

Whatever number you choose is wildly exaggerated because – even without Obamacare – the vast majority of those people – roughly 85% – are already protected because they get coverage from employer plans or from the government, neither of which allows coverage denials or higher premiums based on an individual’s health status. Only about 7% are buying coverage on their own, according to Census data.

The idea that Obamacare has made private health care more affordable is laughable, as well. Almost all of the gains in coverage from Obamacare have been the result of its expansion of Medicaid. But millions of families have been priced out of the individual market because of Obamacare’s benefit mandates and regulations.

A report from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services found that, while the market for subsidized Obamacare policies has been steady since it launched in 2014, the market for unsubsidized policies has plunged.

“From 2016 to 2019, unsubsidized enrollment declined by 2.8 million people, representing a 45% drop nationally,” the report said.

What’s more, an ongoing Gallup survey finds that the share of people who say they’ve put off medical care because of costs is higher today than before Obamacare.

In 2019, a third said they’d done so, compared with 30% in 2013. A quarter of those surveyed in 2019 said they’d even put off treatment for a serious condition because of costs, compared with 17% who said so in 2013.

Among those making less than $40,000 – who are supposedly the main beneficiaries of Obamacare – 36% reported putting off treatments because of costs in 2019, up from 30% in 2013.

Lousy results like that are a big f-ing deal. Which is why Democrats have to keep lying about Obamacare. And why, regardless of what the Supreme Court rules, it should be repealed.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to use our decades of experience to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we think our approach to commentary is sorely lacking both in today’s mainstream media and on the internet. You can help us keep our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

2 comments

  • I always wonder if I am the only person in the United States that is appalled that our ability to purchase health insurance whenever we like was taken away from us under Obamacare. The first year of Obamacare I did not have health insurance because I couldn’t afford it. Circumstances improved and by June I could have purchased insurance, but because I didn’t have a “life event” that fit their criteria I was not allowed to purchase insurance and had to wait for the open period. Why should the government tell us when we can buy or change our health insurance and why does no one ever bring this up?

  • Dem lies about Urkelcare:

    1) lower costs
    2) cut the deficit
    3) crafted in open on CSPAN
    4) cover everyone
    5) its constitutional
    6) online 5 days prior to signing
    7) like your plan keep it
    8) no tax increase for under 250k/yr
    9) not an abortion bill
    10) illegals not covered
    11) not a tax
    12) bi-partisan
    13) create millions of new jobs
    14) allow imported meds
    15) 35 – 40 million uninsured
    16) reduce ER crowding
    17) increase competition
    18) employers costs will fall up to $3,000.00 so they can give you a raise
    19) save the average family $2,500.00 on insurance

  • [print-me target="#post-%ID%"]

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 4,258 other subscribers

Donations

If you like what you see, feel free to leave a donation. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Just click on the Tip Jar above. It will take you to a PayPal donations page. Your contributions will help us defray the cost of running this site. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: