Issues & Insights

Dems Can’t Stop Lying About Obamacare

White House

I&I Editorial

Apparently unable to come up with any alleged high school hijinks or embarrassing yearbook captions, Democrats have decided to make Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination all about Obamacare. Good luck with that.

It didn’t take long for Democrats to settle on their messaging plan for Barrett’s confirmation. If confirmed by the Senate, she will cast the deciding vote to overturn Obamacare, they say.

“It’s no mystery about what’s happening here. President Trump was trying to throw out the Affordable Care Act,” Joe “Big F-ing Deal” Biden said over the weekend. “The Republican Party has been trying to eliminate it for a decade. Twice already, the Supreme Court has upheld that law.” 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told his colleagues “We must focus like a laser on health care because Judge Barrett’s record is so clear on this issue.” He claimed in a press release that a vote for Barrett “is a vote to eliminate health care for millions.”

Democrats point to Barrett’s criticism of Chief Justice John Roberts’ 2012 ruling on Obamacare, in which she correctly characterized what he did by saying he “pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute.”

For those who don’t remember, Roberts ruled that the federal government had no right ordering Americans to buy insurance, but then essentially rewrote the law to claim that what Obamacare was doing was simply taxing people who didn’t buy government-approved plans.

“Had he treated the payment as the statute did — as a penalty — he would have had to invalidate the statute as lying beyond Congress’s commerce power,” Barrett wrote in a 2017 Notre Dame University Law Review.

But the idea that Barrett’s confirmation will guarantee Obamacare’s demise is fatuous. No one could have predicted that Roberts would rewrite the statute so it could pass constitutional muster. And the case heading to the Supreme Court is, by many accounts, a weak one.

What’s more, Democrats are flat out lying about the impact the Supreme Court’s overturning Obamacare would have. Schumer says, for example, that “it’s a virtual certainty that over 150 million Americans health care will be hurt dramatically.”

Really? There are only 8.3 million people enrolled in Obamacare exchanges this year, and 12 million on Medicaid thanks to Obamacare’s massive expansion of the program. How Schumer gets from that to 150 million? By claiming that everyone will lose preexisting condition protections, when in fact most are already protected because they get coverage through work or from the government.

In any case, if the court were to overturn Obamacare, Congress would immediately get to work passing something to replace it. Trump and the GOP have pledged that any replacement plan will protect preexisting conditions. But a Republican alternative would give consumers more choices and would not force them to buy something they don’t want.

The reason Democrats are making hay about Obamacare isn’t that they think it will scotch Barrett’s nomination, nor do they honestly believe that it will mean the death of Obamacare.

They do think, however, that it will let them replay the 2018 midterms, where they won control of the House based on scaring voters by trotting out the same sorts of Obamacare lies.

But this isn’t 2018. And while health care was a top issue then, it isn’t now.

In 2018, 81% of registered voters said that health care was either the most important issue (27% said this) or very important (54%), according to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey in September 2018. It was second only to “corruption in Washington.” Exit polls showed that the issue was a big factor in several Democratic victories that year.

Also, public support for Obamacare in late 2018 was close to its peak – it hit 53% in November, Kaiser’s monthly tracking survey showed.

Today? Well, let’s. We’ve had a pandemic, an economic shutdown, and riots in the streets for months. There’s been no effort to repeal Obamacare by Republicans, and Trump has done several things to make insurance affordable to those priced out of the Obamacare marketplaces.

As a result, health care now ranks below the economy, coronavirus, criminal justice/policing, and race relations on the public’s list of priorities. Just 10% now say health care is the most important issue when deciding their vote for president. Among swing voters, only 11% rank it as No. 1, according to the latest Kaiser survey.

Even among Democrats, only 14% say health care is the most important issue in the 2020 elections.

Meanwhile, support for Obamacare has sagged to 49%.

If Democrats want to fight the last war, by all means let them. If nothing else, it will show voters which party is out of touch with their biggest concerns today.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to use our decades of experience to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we think our approach to commentary is sorely lacking both in today’s mainstream media and on the internet. You can help us keep our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

6 comments

  • The only thing the democrats are afraid of is the truth. If the SCOTUS did the job that they are paid to do, a lot of the liberal policies put in place over the past 15 or so years would be overturned. President Trump has made it possible for the Court to get back to its constitutionally mandated function of reviewing laws in light of the Constitution, as written.
    An originalist Court (or whatever term you want to use) will also stop some, if not most, of the rogue judges who try to create national policy with nationwide edicts from the bench on what would otherwise be local only injunctions.
    When President Trump is done with his next four years I would expect a solid 6-3 court for the the following 20-30 years.

  • The day I get the same care as those who pay nothing….nothing I’ll agree. But cows don’t fly.

  • Obamacare was an unmitigated disaster. Why do Leftists still pretend it hasn’t gutted American healthcare? America’s citizens have already felt the pain Obamacare has caused…I don’t think they see its demise as a negative thing.

  • Pre-Obamacare my meds were $12 a month. POST-Obamacare they shot up to $467 a month. AND I lost my doctor. Since Trump was elected and started dismantling Obamacare, they have dropped to $87 a month. Screw Obamacare!

    • Reg, I pay a scant $80/month less for Obamacare premiums, than I paid for the comparable plan under COBRA from my former employer. Cue former coworkers to me when I complain about my heinous premium, ‘Have you tried Obamacare?’ When I tell them the $1000-plus monthly IS Obamacare, these people suddenly have nothing to say…

  • Democrats defeated Americans with Obamacare. Democrats trying the same on Judge Barrett seems only natural.

  • [print-me target="#post-%ID%"]

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 4,262 other subscribers

Donations

If you like what you see, feel free to leave a donation. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Just click on the Tip Jar above. It will take you to a PayPal donations page. Your contributions will help us defray the cost of running this site. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: