Issues & Insights
Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., posted this image on social media after Democrats voted against a resolution condemning socialism.

That Vote’s Gotta Hurt

Republicans, who are routinely outfoxed by Democrats in Congress, finally seem to have figured out how to play the game correctly. Witness the resolution introduced by Rep. Jeff Crank, R-Colo., denouncing socialism and upholding the Constitution.

You’d think this sort of resolution would be a no-brainer. It’s not a law. There’s no money involved. It’s just a statement that lawmakers are asked to affirm, or not. And who could possibly vote against a statement that says the House “condemns and denounces socialism in all its forms” and “recommits itself to upholding the Constitution of the United States”?

How about 192 Democrats?

Why vote against it? Because that’s not all the resolution says.

The preamble starts with a list of socialism’s sins: “a concentration of power that has, time and time again, collapsed into communist regimes, totalitarian rule, and repressive dictatorships,” “famine and mass murders, and the killing of over 100,000,000 people worldwide,” the Democratic Socialists of America’s call for “abolishing the U.S. Senate, implementing ranked choice voting in all elections, and replacing the two-party system,” and so on. All irrefutably true.

But it shifts gears and starts talking about voting and the need “to require common-sense election integrity measures, including proof of citizenship, photo identification, and database checks.”

Then it lists what it’s affirming:

That the House of Representatives —

(1) condemns and denounces socialism in all its forms, including the Democratic Socialists of America, and opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States;

(2) reaffirms its support for free, fair, and secure elections;

(3) reiterates the notion that American elections are for American citizens only;

(4) recommits itself to upholding the Constitution of the United States; and

(5) calls for enactment of the SAVE America Act to ensure election security, increase public confidence in America’s voting system, and close loopholes in order to prevent noncitizens from voting in elections.

That last line was too much for Democrats.

“We’re capitalists. We believe in a capitalist system and rules and laws,” said Calif. Rep. Pete Aguilar. “But what Republicans are seeking to do here is to just add in another talking point where they can talk about the SAVE Act.” 

Now, keep in mind that the House has already passed that (overwhelmingly popular) bill by a 218-213 margin in February, with just one Democrat — Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar — voting “aye.”

So, it’s not entirely surprising that most Democrats felt they couldn’t vote for this resolution, although we’d like to hear explanations from the seven Democrats who joined Cuellar in casting their votes for a resolution that calls for enactment of a bill they voted against.

That’s the genius of a resolution like this.

Because instead of focusing on the SAVE Act, headlines focused on the resolution’s condemnation of socialism, like the sampling below:

Republicans now have fresh evidence of the radicalism that has infected the Democratic Party, which they can take to voters just two months before election day.

So, kudos to Rep. Crank. We hope these sorts of “gotcha” antics catch on among the otherwise stupid Republican Party.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

Support Independent Journalism

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left.

We are 100% reader supported!!

If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.

And be sure to tell your friends!

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

Add comment

Rules for Comments: Getting comments posted on this site is a privilege, not a right. We review every one before posting. Comments must adhere to these simple rules: Keep them civil and on topic. And please do not use ALL CAPS to emphasize words. Obvious attempts to troll us won’t get posted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Our Declaration of Independence From Big Tech

Support Independent Journalism

We are now 100% reader supported!!

If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.

And be sure to tell your friends!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Follow us on

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading