Issues & Insights
port of entry building in us in winter
Photo by Matt Barnard on Pexels.com

Trump Should Extend ‘Gold Cards’ To Include ‘Silver’ And ‘Bronze’

Donald Trump has once again “shaken the box” – as cartoonist-turned-podcaster Scott Adams would put it. His announcement of $5-million “gold cards” reframes the immigration debate by assigning a value to our greatest asset, the privilege of U.S. citizenship and access to our limitless opportunities.

But to realize his plan’s full, breathtaking potential – to resolve in one fell swoop, our two most intractable challenges, illegal immigration and our $37-trillion national debt – the president should consider two “brand extensions:” going “silver” and “bronze.”

The gold card concept has two “bugs”: optics and volume. Offering super-immigration rights only to the ultra-rich or through large corporations is already under attack. It’s contrary to MAGA’s image as a middle-class movement and gives credibility to progressives’ constant harangue that President Trump is interested only in serving the multimillionaire/billionaire cohort.

Moreover, the math falls short on two fronts.

The first: a limited pool of eligible and interested applicants. As of 2020, fewer than 3 million people in the entire world boasted net worths north of $5 million, and most of those are either already in the U.S., in China, a somewhat dubious source of immigrants, or living comfortably in the developed world. And not many more individuals would generate sufficient revenues to justify a corporate investment of $5 million. 

Second, even with a larger pool, the government’s revenue stream from gold cards won’t put the kind of dent into the debt the president claims: “If we sell a million, that’s $5 trillion.” Hitting that target would require an enormous share of the world’s wealthiest to come here, and even then cover only a fraction of the debt.

But just like moving from the upscale to the middle and ultimately to the mass market can exponentially increase scale in a business, introducing tiered “brand extensions” of the gold card would not only dramatically increase its revenue potential to the point of retiring the nation’s debt but also make the initiative more equitable, attract a larger pool of talent and convert the strain on resources from illegal immigration into an ongoing revenue stream.

The two proposed additional tiers, which together could be branded the pay-to-stay plan:

Silver cards priced at $1 million payable over 30 to 50 years, financed with citizenship mortgagesThe 10-plus million applicants who lose the green card lottery each year could obtain the cards and start on a path to citizenship in exchange for mortgages payable over 30 to 50 years, financed with low-interest bank loans.

Bronze cards attainable for a fee of $30 a day (potentially paid by up to five U.S. citizen or corporate sponsors at $5 per day plus $5 from the immigrant) would enable illegal immigrants and legal guest workers to stay in or legally enter the U.S. and work without gaining permanent residency, although recipients would be free to enter the green card lottery. The cards, and permission to work, would remain valid as long as the fees continue to be paid or a holder “wins” the green card lottery.

And those “brand extensions” deliver appreciable benefits:

  • Transforming the cost sink (and social disruption) of illegal immigration – estimated at $150 billion annually for the federal government alone – into a revenue center generating sufficient funds to pay off the entire national debt over 11 years.
  • Shifting the profile of immigrants from criminals, terrorists and gang members plus non-working asylum seekers to, for the bronze card, immigrants with good intentions who will volunteer to show up and be closely vetted and, for silver cards, the best and brightest the world has to offer, willing to invest in themselves – with the responsibility to vet them. 
  • Funding increased border security and deportation efforts for immigrants here illegally and not willing or able to pay for the bronze cards or find employer or sponsors. Identifying criminals will also be easier because they are very unlikely to show up for the extensive vetting that those with appropriate, pro-American intentions will find quite reasonable.
  • Allow U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to focus on re-securing the border, thereby reducing fentanyl and human trafficking and protecting our national security and re-instill respect for the rule of law.
  • And, by the way, addressing labor shortages that are not just looming nationwide but actually here with the flow of illegals already slowing. While it might seem a bit stereotypical to mention, I’ve received firsthand reports of strawberry fields being plowed under here in the Salinas Valley of Monterey County, California, the Salad Bowl to the World, and other industries could be affected as well. Fixing this quickly will help forestall any inflation due workforce disruption. 

Besides solving the optics and volume problems with the gold cards – and tackling both our indebtedness and border security issues – there’s one additional bonus from adding the two tiers. Their greater reach and broader potential to create opportunity for prospective workers at all income levels might well attract rare bipartisan support from Democrats and progressives who reflexively dismiss even broadly popular, common-sense proposals from Trump.

An expanded, multi-brand, multi-tiered initiative that could tackle our two biggest national challenges – and promote unity at a time of untold division? That would be striking pure political gold. 

So Mr. President: go for the silver – and bronze!

Lee Lorenzen is a history-making entrepreneur whose more than 32 startups and dozens of innovations include the multi-vendor shopping cart that launched Amazon’s expansion from online bookseller to $2.5 trillion “Everything Store.” 

4 comments

  • First: This very clever and unique idea establishes another long term department within a department of even more bureaucrats. Isn’t that what DOGE is seeking to reduce? And what long term department within a department has not veered off its original purpose into mission creep and corruption?

    Second: Let us first debate the optimum population size we want the US to be. We have 200 million more people than not too long ago when I was born in 1948. 140 million people then in the good old days!
    Is 200 million more people today far too many people already?

    Do we actually want fewer people as our optimum population target for preservation of open space, reduced energy use, less pollution, no more highways, reduced flooding and reduced crowding issues which have concerned us for decades?
    Think how many issues will be solved with fewer people to support.

    Third: Why encourage more immigrants of any classification before the conclusion of our national debate about what our optimum population should be? Fewer than today’s 340 million seems like the place to begin this debate?

    Fourth: Gold Card immigrants and the other cards for attracting even more legal immigrants seems like putting the cart before the horse.

  • That line about vetting the bronze card holders caught my attention in the worst way. It is what is wrong with our thinking today, a default reliance on government. We would have to hire a really large bunch of bureaucrats to do it. Of course, there will have to be at least three levels of supervision for the bureaucrats, as well as more to administer the money to pay them. There will have to be people to manage the building leased for office space, and the list goes on and on.

    No, I do not want anything that grows government.

  • I wouldn’t want the US to put out a silver or bronze visa card. A gold card-in effect-is one way to vet a person. To get a gold card either you are either wealthy yourself (which is one self identifying way to be vetted) or a company will buy it for you (to gain your services).
    As someone from another internet-periodical says-and it is true-countries could insert wealthy spies. But I believe their past and other ways to check them out would nip this in the bud. After all, if they were wealthy, they would have to show and prove how they got their wealth.
    I think it would be much more easy to insert spies by paying for something cheaper than what costs $5 million, ie. the gold card. Moreover, I don’t think the vetting process would or could be as effective or thorough.
    As implied in the article, companies very well might want to spend $5million to keep or acquire an aspiring American visa student.
    As pointed out in this column this could very well chop away our debt (I believe 1,000,000 gold cards sold means $5trillion of our debt can be wiped out) while also helping to build our technology/manufacturing/financial power.
    Thank God we have a President now who thinks outside the box, rather than one who, when President, looked and acted as if he should be laying in one.

  • Despite the gold card program not yet being implemented or even an application created, Howard Lutnick claimed 250,000 individuals are awaiting the new “gold card” visa. That’s 1.25 trillion dollars. The $5M gold visa is for people who can create jobs/opportunities in America who will pay taxes. It’s not simply a wealthy person purchasing his way in.
    And even if that was the case, it’s a lot of people who aren’t gonna be lounging around some NY hotel on the taxpayer dime not paying any (sorry, paying a sales tax and soda and chips doesn’t count).
    After Biden allowed over 11+ million illegals to take root in the USA (on top of the existing 12 million illegals), I have no problem with “wealthy” people buying their way in if it helps our dire financial situation and creates jobs and opportunities.
    Time will tell if this helps our debt and deficit.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading