Issues & Insights
Screenshot, U.S. Embassy in Libya

The Democrats Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks

The Democrats’ reaction to the Department of Government Efficiency’s necessary mission might seem a bit excessive. But it is understandable. Their taxpayer-funded slush fund has been exposed.

Rather than joining with Elon Musk, who is leading DOGE to root out federal waste and fraud, and improve the transparency of the murky federal leviathan, the Democrats are attacking him. At a rally a week ago outside the Capitol, Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley, chanted “Elon Musk must go” along with a rabble that seems eager to do harm to the South African billionaire.

There have been similar protests in other cities in which baying mobs demand that Musk be deported, sexually violated, even launched to Mars.

Meanwhile, the Congressional Progressive Caucus wants the Democrats to find a way to “fire” Musk. New York Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer has groused on X that “an unelected shadow government is conducting a hostile takeover of the federal government,” surely unaware that he’s implying that the permanent bureaucracy is a separate, unaccountable, untouchable and unconstitutional branch of the government. Harpy pundits swear Musk is carrying out a coup and is a threat to democracy, a frivolous slogan that the political left cannot resist using.

Other complaints against the DOGE operation included grousing that Musk’s team has access to sensitive Treasury data and is holding back important federal programs.

But the real reason the Democrats are so upset is because their racket at the U.S. Agency for International Aid has been exposed, and they fear it’s just the first of many similar duplicitous schemes throughout the government that will be uncovered. They’ve even been able to convince their core voters that Musk and his team, merely doing the job they were asked to do by the duly elected president, are pure evil that must be stopped.

What has to be stopped, though, is the Democrats’ five-star gravy train that funds, as described by Jeffrey Tucker of the Brownstone Institute, “deep-state operations, censorship, and NGO graft on a scale never before seen.” In this shell game, taxpayers’ dollars are funneled “through multiple layers, with various entities handling and redistributing it” to the right groups and people who back those who are directing the funds. It’s a virtuous rather than vicious cycle – or virtuous at least to its participants who reap the benefits.

There have been so many ways of describing the manipulations and maneuverings but none we’ve seen so far pierce quite so accurately and deeply as does the description from former Chicago Tribune columnist John Kass, who explains “why Democrats are so angry” so clearly that even a New York Times or Washington Post reporter could understand.

“For years, they’ve been getting paid with your money, a billion dollars a week of American tax dollars, and laughing at you as the United States faces a fiscal deficit and as you’ve pinched your pennies hoping to survive the Democrat Party’s 20% inflation, as their leftist allies were living large,” writes Kass. “They’ve been discovered. We see the hate and madness in their eyes directed at us for seeing the other side of their face. Now they’re screaming like scalded cats in a sack.”

Law professor and the Instapundit himself Glenn Reynolds also lays it out with clarity.

“With trillions of dollars passing through the federal government every year, there are a lot of opportunities for crooks and financial predators to siphon some off,” says Reynolds. “A cynic might even speculate that the people screaming the loudest about DOGE’s audits are the people most invested in the fraud.”

It really doesn’t take a cynic, though. A fair-minded person would see the same thing.

Which is why we’re where we are today, with Democrats re-enacting right in front of us Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” doing their best to direct attention away from their own misdeeds.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

 

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

6 comments

  • “an unelected shadow government is conducting a hostile takeover of the federal government,”
    We have been telling them that for, at least, the last 16 years, why weren’t they following thru then? BECAUSE IT AS THEIR GRIFT!!!
    Following the lines of saul alinksy, accuse your enemies of doing what you are actually doing.
    What a bunch of sleazballs (to put it nicely) the democrats are.

  • “an unelected shadow government is conducting a hostile takeover of the federal government,”
    Apparently they’ve been asleep at the wheel over the last 4 years as Weekend at Bernies unfolded before our eyes, but our dem friends feigned ignorance. Neigh, they made statements like “COGENT! Fit as a fiddle! Best version ever!”
    All the while ignoring their own eyes and senses and scolding anyone who dared to notice that biden couldn’t possibly be in charge. It was his youthful cabal of over-educated, kaleidascope hair colored and face bejeweled minions running the show. Why the Chinese didn’t go after Taiwan in the last 4 years will be a question for the ages.

  • The criminals who have been running the asylum really don’t appreciate it when somebody turns over their pet rocks. all that sudden sunlight hurts their eyes, you see.

  • Elon Musk is a US citizen who was born in South Africa. A legal immigrant who is now as much of a citizen as any so-called editor at Issues & Insights and yet you insist on calling him a South African. By your standards, Barry Soetoro is our only Indonesian former President and Keanu Reeves is Lebanese. This is no simple mix up, is it?

  • If it weren’t so serious it would be amusing. Obama and Biden appointed judges who rule according to their Progessive bent. Why are we surprised? What we should be is angry.
    It appears obvious that the “legal warfare” against Trump (and his supporters) have not abated. The bureaucrats (including the non-impartial Federal judges) are now trying to swamp Trump with legal chicanery-using their words as weapons and their rulings as bullets.
    Why is it the legacy and other media don’t call the judges rulings “election interference?”
    After all, President Trump ran to clean up the swamp and he was elected by a popular vote majority to do this.
    Why aren’t the judges declared “insurrectionists?” They are doing more damage, and causing more foreseeable damage to democracy, than Trump’s January 6th supporters ever did.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading