America is one year away from the most consequential and negative campaign most have seen. So important and virulent, it is worth taking stock of now. Both sides have great weaknesses, which present the other great opportunities. However, the greater opportunity is Donald Trump’s, so despite his seemingly perilous position, the election remains his to lose.
Next year’s race is important simply because it is a presidential one. Already the nation’s most powerful office, presidents of both parties are rapidly increasing its authority. The coming clash between divergent approaches over how a powerful presidency should be used heightens the election’s importance even more.
The ideological contrast will also further increase the campaign’s virulence. Fresh from a divisive impeachment fight, the country will face an unusual contest in which both parties run toward their bases, rather than the center. It will accentuate stark differences between ideologies, economics, and policies.
On Trump’s ledger, his resume is only so-so. Likely to be only the third president impeached in American history, he is at his lowest point between now and November 2020. His job approval hovers in the 40s — usually underwater. The economy is good, but no longer spectacular, and is hindered by multiple trade conflicts — which Trump has championed. He has recent foreign policy successes — notably the killing of ISIS’ top two leaders. Finally, America is divided, with much of it centered on him.
Perhaps absent at first glance, there are positives here. Trump’s job approval is about where President Barack Obama’s was at the same point in his presidency — despite Obama’s being unaffected by impeachment — and Obama handily won reelection. According to Rasmussen’s Nov. 15 daily tracking poll, Trump had a 50% job approval, while Obama’s was 49% on Nov. 15, 2011. Expect Trump’s approval to rise — especially following Senate acquittal.
Further, Obama’s economy lagged Trump’s — even without the drag of trade conflicts. Trump’s is fundamentally strong and he can unilaterally diminish the trade disputes encumbering it and bolster it further. Like Trump, Obama had Osama bin Laden’s killing, but also had a divided country — much centered on him, due to Obamacare and higher taxes.
Trump’s biggest advantage compared to Obama will be in his reelection opponent. Mitt Romney in 2012 was an uninspiring, but status quo, Republican. In 2020, Democrats probably will nominate an iconoclastic candidate, who will challenge America’s ideological, political, and economic standards.
After almost five months, the Democrat field remains fragmented. Front-runner Joe Biden commands support only from approximately a quarter of Democrats. Almost two-thirds of Democrats support a group of candidates on the left.
It is difficult to see the Democrats’ nominee not coming from this now predominant left. It is still harder to see how that candidate will not have to go “hard left” to win Democrat supporters. Running that direction means challenging America’s status quo, and violating candidates’ traditional shift to the center in the general election. It will also make Trump the de facto defender of America’s status quo, helping increase his appeal — even if only by default — with important centrist voters.
There is a reason why elected incumbents over the last century have gone 11-3 seeking second terms. Trump will have an incumbency advantage, as well as the economy and campaign cash. However, no advantage is likely to be bigger than the one he will have in his adversary.
It is a given that Trump will be less appealing than Obama. However, his currently unknown opponent will be too — a candidate unable to break from the Democrat pack, let alone with the general electorate. Trump’s opponent will be far more threatening than Obama’s was in 2012.
This “opponent gap” favors Trump where he needs it most: The center. With his other advantages, Trump looks too much to overcome for an opponent who Democrats will require to run away from America’s center. If Trump won in 2016 due in large part to Hillary Clinton’s shortcomings, his 2020 success will be due in even larger part to those of his still unknown opponent from the left.
J.T. Young served under President George W. Bush as the director of communications in the Office of Management and Budget and as deputy assistant secretary in legislative affairs for tax and budget at the Treasury Department. He served as a congressional staffer from 1987-2000.
Note to Readers: Issues & Insights is a new site launched by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to use our decades of experience to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day.
We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we think our approach to commentary is sorely lacking both in today’s mainstream media and on the internet. If you like what you see, feel free to click the Tip Jar over on the right sidebar. And be sure to tell your friends!
Using these vague “policy violations,” Google is now threatening to demonetize us. It’s part of Big Tech’s effort to silence conservative voices.
You need a proofreader. More than once, the article refers to the Obama reelection campaign as if it took place in 2016. That was the Trump-Clinton contest. Obama-Romney was 2012.
Are you offering to join our all-volunteer squad?
Good answer! The hammers and the nails are right here waiting for Mr. Wood’s sweat and tears. They get more done than hot air does.
The end of the 2020 election, regardless of the winner, poses even more formidable problems. Should the Democrats lose, what do they do in 2024? Go even further left? Is such a thing possible? Will this second defeat, especially if the popular vote is even more skewed than in 2016, result in civil unrest? Should the Republicans lose, how do Republicans follow an act (or aberration?) like Donald Trump? Either way, we are in for some unpleasant years ahead.