Issues & Insights

The Donald’s Second-Term Vision Leaves You Wanting More

Man, that was a long wait.

With his usual heavy dose of hammy showmanship, ex-reality TV star Donald J. Trump, more than half an hour into his packed Orlando rally, launched the already previewed “co-slogan” for his second election campaign: “Keep America Great.”

Then took another 35-plus minutes to provide a tantalizingly small taste of what that means.

Instead, for the three-score and six minutes bookending the slogan’s unveiling, the audience that crammed the Amway Center was treated, if that’s the right word, to yet another reprise of The Donald’s Greatest Hits.  And all too many once again, to mix multiple metaphors, fell cringeworthily below the belt or outside the lines.

After all, is it really necessary to open a re-election campaign with another snarky attack on the assembled media: that’s a lot of fake news back there?”

And yes.  We all know that the Mueller probe came up empty and that Democrats are looking for a “do-over.”  But was it really the “greatest witch hunt in political history?” (Worse than Joe McCarthy?)  And is a campaign speech really the time or place to dwell on it?

How about the never-ending obsession with “Crooked Hillary,” the “free pass” she and her aides got, her “very expensive” “acid wash” job on her emails, and how she allegedly “turned the State Department into a pay-for-play cash machine?”   Mr. President, you can be sure of one thing:  Madame Secretary won’t be your 2020 opponent.  Time to retire “lock her up.”

We’re all used to this President entitling himself to his own facts.  But has Trump really accomplished more than any Chief Executive in the first two and a half years of a presidency?  More than, say, FDR or LBJ?

Has “nobody ever been tougher on Russia?”  Not The Gipper?

Are our air and water truly “the cleanest they have ever been, by far?”  Going back to, say, colonial times?

There’s no problem with the standard and highly justifiable rundown of the Administration’s accomplishments.  With an otherwise solid theme of how the 2016 election had transferred power back to the people.  Or even with a tough but fair attack on the desire for “domination and control” and outright radicalism that has overtaken his opposition.

But this time, for sure, a trio of New York Times reporters got their description of the first six-sevenths of the President’s speech right: an unfortunate “torrent of attacks, falsehoods, exaggerations and resentments.”

A good re-election speech is equal parts review of the incoming situation, recitation of accomplishments, characterization of your opponent – and forward-looking vision.  Getting to that future-facing platform in minute 66 of a 77-minute address ain’t gonna get you there, by a long shot.

Ultimately the President did lay out some hopeful and intriguing ideas.  Continuing to unleash “the power of American enterprise so that every American can know the dignity of work and the pride of a paycheck.”  Creating a “safe, modern and lawful system of immigration” that “strengthens our country, upholds our values, and protects our way of life.”

Trade deals “that ensure more products are properly stamped with the words, ‘Made in the USA.’”  “A great health care system based on honesty, transparency, more options and far lower costs for much better care.”  “School choice to millions of underserved children who are trapped in failing schools.”  “Expand opportunity zones so that no community is ever left behind.”  “Defend privacy, free speech, religious liberty and the right to keep and bear arms.”  “Push forward with new medical frontiers,” including cures for cancer and AIDS. 

But then it was away from specifics and off to flag-waving cultural wedge issues: “the American Constitution and the rule of law,” “the dignity of work,” and “the sanctity of life.”  “Faith and family. Teaching children to “love our country, honor our history and always respect our great American flag.”  And “living by our great American motto:  in God We Trust.”

In another words, in a speech spanning the better part of two hours of cable TV, basically two paragraphs worth of second-Administration agenda with one paragraph rehashing first-Administration guiding principles.

Certainly, the President has gotten this far by breaking the rules and not just defying but remaking political convention.  He has made an art of the rally format and a slashing and combative style.  It’s hard to count how often the whole world has agreed that this time, Donald Trump has gone too far.

But one suspects that beyond his base, his act may be wearing thin – and his accomplishments may already be “priced in.”  That independents may desire to see less flesh flayed and more flesh on the bones of a skeleton second-term plan.  And that if the President doesn’t define what “Keep America Great” really means, his Democratic opponents will be more than happy to do it for him.

In offering so little, and way too late, regarding what four more years will be all about, the President has undoubtedly left many wanting more.  Voters who endured his 66 often-painful opening minutes may not be willing to wait till November 3, 2020 to hear the rest.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.



    • Ditto. The dems are offering promises but promises don’t pay utility bills or mortgages or put food on anyone’s table or gas in their cars or money in their pockets.

      The only tangible outcome of democrats promises are higher taxes, higher unemployment, more crime, more poverty, more illegal squatters in our country and more empty promises.

  • I have just started with this site and have been pleased so far, but this article smells of beltway-group-think. The writer may be tired of hearing about issues like Muller”s reluctant exoneration, but many never heard it until this speech. Outside the beltway, many read only news from liberal outlets. A couple of days ago, Lawrence Jones did a man in the street interview at an anti-Trump rally. One woman said it was because he “colluded with the Russians”. Another said it was because he “said white supremacists were nice people”–this was repeated by at least 2 of the Democratic candidates. These 2 issues have been decisively put to rest in the media the writer and I patronize, but these people are so sure of it, they are willing to go out and wave a sign.

    If the future plans were too vague for you, consider that this guy gets no support and has to be creative to get anything done. Further, he takes his promises seriously, so he doesn’t make them lightly. Unlike Biden who will “cure cancer”.

    I hope this site can dial down the snark.

    • Obviously your talking about Trump. I can’t think of anyone else in the political realm where a promise made is nothing more than a campaign gimmick.

      As to the people in the man in the street interview, that’s typical of people who think with their hearts and not with their heads.

      One of my pet peeves is that in America today, every one feels; no one thinks anymore. The result of which are the two people in the interview.

      When was the last time anyone heard the phrase “what do you think?” You’re more likely to hear the phrase “how do you feel?”

      Feeling is easy. Thinking is hard. In my view, thinking seems to be a painful experience for most people (particularly the lowbrow types) and they avoid doing it unless it becomes necessary.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
%d bloggers like this: