Issues & Insights
Screenshot

A Modest Proposal To Tackle Government Fraud

Every day, it seems, brings a new story of government fraud, which raises two questions: Why is fraud so rampant? And why is so little being done to combat it?

An answer to both can be found in the more than 200 programs that the federal government pays for, but the states run. These are programs that spend a total of $1.2 trillion a year, and despite their openness to fraud, the government does little to combat it.

The money to fund these programs passes through several hands, including state and local government agencies, private contractors, and so on, before reaching a beneficiary. And “every level added to the flow of funds creates a new entry point for fraud risks,” according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

So what systems are in place to detect and prevent fraud in these programs? Almost none.

The GAO looked at 20 of the biggest programs — which includes Medicaid, food stamps, special education grants, infrastructure projects, and others — that account for nearly 90% of that $1.2 trillion. It found that only five have anti-fraud detection measures in place. Ten of them — including biggies like Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and SNAP — had only partial measures. The others have even less.

Worse, legislation requiring agencies to report on their anti-fraud measures lapsed in 2020.

So, it’s not surprising that audits done from 2020 through 2024 found “severe and persistent findings” of fraud risks in 18 of those 20 programs.

As our good friend Mark Tapscott notes at The Washington Stand, this is the ”latest of hundreds of GAO reports identifying hundreds of billions of federal tax dollars lost to waste, fraud, and corruption.”

Trump has been targeting fraud and waste this term, first with DOGE and now his White House Anti-Fraud Task Force, headed by Vice President J.D. Vance. Just last week, the administration withheld more than $1 billion in Medicaid funds intended for California and Minnesota over concerns about widespread fraud in those states.

That’s a start. Now Congress needs to step up and reinstate the fraud reporting requirement that it let lapse. “With this information, Congress would be better positioned to identify gaps in agencies’ fraud risk management practices, benchmark progress over time, and drive accountability,” the GAO notes.

But there’s another option that nobody mentions yet would do much, much more to permanently combat fraud. Stop sending taxpayer money to the states altogether.

It makes no sense to have taxpayers send their hard-earned dollars to Washington, then have those same dollars sent back to their states in the form of program grants, with countless middlemen taking their cuts along the way, legally and illegally.


See also:

“The Fraud Industry Is Thriving, And Guess Who’s Happy About It“

“Want To Eliminate Fraud? Cut The Federal Government By Two-Thirds“

“For Today’s Democrats, Fraud Is A Feature, Not A Bug“


The federal government is ill-equipped to keep track of how $1.2 trillion is being dispersed through a vast web of state agencies and private companies.

And states have little incentive to combat fraud in these programs. Why should they? It’s not their money they’re trying to protect. If anything, this kind of fraud is good for state politicians. As we saw in Minnesota, it brings lots of money in, and every year they can push for more federal funds by claiming the need is greater than ever.

So, what would happen if the federal money pipeline was cut? First, federal taxes could be reduced by $1.2 trillion a year — which means less money leaving the states to begin with.

Second, states that want generous benefit programs would have to raise their own taxes, making politicians more directly accountable both to taxpayers and political opponents for how that money is spent.

Of course, this kind of bold change is a pipe dream. No Republican politician would ever dare propose such a thing, and Democrats, as we’ve pointed out in this space, depend on fraud for their livelihoods. (See: “The Fraud Industry Is Thriving, And Guess Who’s Happy About It.”)

Which means that, no matter how many reports the GAO publishes, or how much politicians wring their hands, and no matter how many temporary task forces are set up, the waste and fraud will continue.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

Support Independent Journalism

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left.

We are 100% reader supported!!

If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.

And be sure to tell your friends!

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

10 comments

  • Drop 25 billion more into fraud investigations and public education and probably abolish some federal agencies also

  • How about the US government dismantling all federal and state agencies, and local social services offices? End all government contributions to nonprofit organizations that provide relief to individuals or engage in feeding-our-future type claims. Immediately cut taxes by the amount that has funded food, shelter, medical and cash aid, the bureaucracies that administer these programs, and grants to nonprofits.

    Set up a crowdfunding site where any American citizen can post a request for voluntary contributions. Americans generally being a generous bunch, and having extra cash thanks to a substantial tax reduction, are likely to contribute to worthy requests.

    Research by potential donors into the requests would be a sort of crowd sourcing of anti-fraud efforts.

  • Cheaters will always be with us, just like unethical men pretending to be women and cheating in women’s sports.
    Fools allow that, like the former President of University of Penn, Amy Gutmann. Who would ever have thought that the President of an esteemed Ivy, a female herself, would allow, support and ferociously defend such corruption and cheating against her own university’s female students?
    With that as a baseline, it is easy to see how billions of dollars can be swindled and cheated from the Federal Government, too, unless who have, throughout, people of much higher moral fiber.

  • Another surefire method is for Americans to stop paying taxes. As soon as their slush funds have NO funds, they will have no choice but to cut the waste.

  • It’s hard to believe that our “exalted” Congress didn’t realize the possibility and even the likelihood that this fraud could and would occur. Why did they vote for such rip-offs? Because they didn’t care.
    They didn’t care because all (or at least most) of the Congressperson’s allegiance is to the locality and state they come from.
    After all, it is the locality and state where they get the votes to insure that they are elected; thus, they have an incentive to run this scam-which is noting but redistribution and theft
    It is about time we realized it. It’s also about time that something is done about it.
    As an aside this upheaval and war against such fraud is uncovered under the Trump Administration. The same Trump who enfires those with TDS to revile him.
    This is one of the reasons why I like and admire Trump so. It’s because of the enemies he engages, engenders and who are so obviously envious of him!

  • Rewarding those who discover and expose fraud and waste with a percentage of the recovered money might be one hell of an incentive to out the miscreants.

  • Federal Government would never shut off the taxpayer gravy train.
    Only We the People could do that via a Tax Revolt. It would put a hurting on fraud but I’m afraid as they get used to Tariff money coming in, they would just start stealing that… if they’re not doing that already.

  • Fraud monies go clear to the top. There is no incentive to shut it down…

  • The media provides non-stop stories of successfully combatting fraud from the Republicans and stories of people harmed by the Democrats. Given all this, I would expect to see some movement in the numbers but the deficit continues to grow to its largest ever and we continue to print boatloads of money. Please, somebody tell us the truth and back it up with some numbers. I fear we are all just being gaslit.

Our Declaration of Independence From Big Tech

Support Independent Journalism

We are now 100% reader supported!!

If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.

And be sure to tell your friends!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Follow us on

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading