Issues & Insights
aerial view of car lot in libya
Photo by abdo alshreef on Pexels.com

Did Trump Accidentally Create An EV Mandate? (Or, Why CAFE Must Be Ended, Not Mended)

Despite his attempts to jettison Joe Bidenโ€™s EV mandates, President Donald Trump might have inadvertently set the stage for one of his own.

Welcome to the upside-down world of federal government fuel economy standards.

Amid the government-created โ€œenergy crisis,โ€ a Democratic Congress passed, and President Gerald Ford foolishly signed, a law in 1975 that dictated the average fuel economy automakers must reach for the passenger cars they sell in a given year. Failure to meet that standard meant paying huge fines.

The energy crisis is long gone, but the federal โ€œCorporate Average Fuel Economyโ€ (CAFE) standards live on. And, as with any regulation, it metastasized into an enormously complicated and expensive pile of rules. Barack Obama and Biden both tried to use CAFE as a backdoor EV mandate.

Since taking office, Trump has taken several big steps toward liberating the auto industry from this monstrosity. Last December, he proposed a significant rollback of Bidenโ€™s super-strict CAFE standards. He signed a law eliminating the fines for violating those CAFE standards. He overturned a rule that gave the EPA carte blanche to regulate carbon emissions from cars. And he ended the massive taxpayer subsidy for EV sales. (All of which we celebrated in these pages.)


See Also:


But we recently learned about another, largely overlooked, rule change that could still end up acting like an EV mandate.

Hereโ€™s why. One of the many complicating factors in setting CAFE standards was what to do with electric cars? More than 20 years ago, government bureaucrats had decided that an EV got the equivalent of 330 miles per gallon. This is called the โ€œpetroleum equivalency factor.โ€

It was a ridiculous claim with no basis in reality, but it turned out to be an escape valve for automakers.

โ€œEven if automakers produced relatively few EVs, they would still get an outsized credit that could offset an otherwise inefficient fleet,โ€ notes an in-depth article in E&E News.

Think of it this way: if you sold one EV for every 99 gasoline-powered cars that got 15 miles per gallon, your โ€œaverage fuel economyโ€ would be 18 mpg. (Another escape valve was the classification of SUVs and minivans as โ€œlight trucks,โ€ which are a separate category from passenger cars and face far less restrictive CAFE standards, and which wildly distorted the market, but thatโ€™s another story.)

In its determination to force EV sales, the Biden administration decided to cut the โ€œpetroleum equivalency factorโ€ by a third โ€” dramatically shrinking this escape valve โ€” while sharply raising the CAFE standard to 50 mpg by 2031. To comply, automakers would have no choice but to shift their fleets almost entirely over to EVs โ€” regardless of what consumers wanted to buy.

Well, lawsuits ensued, and a federal appeals court ruled in 2025 that the Biden change was illegal, so the โ€œpetroleum equivalency factorโ€ went back to 330 mpg.

But then Trumpโ€™s Energy Department โ€œabruptly cut that credit by 85%,โ€ E&E News reports. โ€œEVs were now assumed to get about 50 mpg equivalent, roughly on par with many plug-in hybrid models.โ€

While 50 mpg is probably a more realistic comparison, the result could be to force automakers to quadruple their EV sales, according to E&E News.

We donโ€™t know whether that concern is legitimate, but we do know that if Democrats regain control of the White House and Congress, this much lower โ€œpetroleum equivalency factorโ€ would make it far easier to impose draconian EV mandates in the future.

So, whatโ€™s the answer? Well, the Trump administration could find a way to boost the โ€œpetroleum equivalency factor.โ€ Or it could lower the CAFE standards still more. Or it could tweak other parts of the rules to lessen the burden on automakers and car buyers.

But thereโ€™s a much simpler solution.

Trump and his fellow Republicans need to scrap CAFE altogether. Repeal the law. Eliminate the regulations. Rip it out, root and branch. Then poison the soil. And in doing so, make it clear that the government has absolutely no business whatsoever dictating to car companies what the average fuel economy of the vehicles they sell must be.

Because otherwise, no matter how much trimming is done, CAFE will eventually reemerge, bigger and more harmful than ever.

โ€“  Written by the I&I Editorial Board

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

Add comment

Rules for Comments: Getting comments posted on this site is a privilege, not a right. We review every one before posting. Comments must adhere to these simple rules: Keep them civil and on topic. And please do not use ALL CAPS to emphasize words. Obvious attempts to troll us wonโ€™t get posted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs.ย 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading