I & I Editorial BoardJust how corrupt are journalists these days? Consider this example from earlier in the week involving the explosive Minnesota fraud scandal – the one the mainstream media covered up for years and is now busy trying to downplay.
On Tuesday, Josh Gerstein, a “senior legal affairs reporter” for Politico, weighed in in response to the Nick Shirley video, in which the amateur journalist took his camera to various empty taxpayer-supported “day care centers” that were obvious fronts.
Instead of expressing outrage that fraudsters were stealing massive amounts of money meant to support poor families – and his colleagues in the mainstream press got scooped by a kid – Gerstein issued a veiled threat to people like Shirley.
“At some point,” he posted on X, “the amateur effort to knock on doors of home daycares intersects with robust stand-your-ground laws.”
That prompted a tsunami of angry responses, including one from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which said, “You would think a ‘Senior Legal Affairs Reporter’ for POLITICO would know better than to tweet something inciting violence against federal agents.”
Gerstein tried to backpedal a little, saying, “To observe that something is likely to happen or there’s a serious risk of it happening is not to advocate for it happening.”
RELATED: “What Nick Shirley’s Minnesota Fraud Story Says About Legacy Media“
But that just proves Gerstein – a pedigreed journalist who’d previously been with CNN, ABC News, and the New York Sun – is woefully ignorant as well as recklessly irresponsible.
Because, despite what Gerstein claims, Minnesota doesn’t even have a “stand your ground” law – much less a “robust” one. It does, however, have a “duty to retreat” law.
Here’s how one law firm explains Minnesota’s law:
Essentially, if you’re attacked, the law mandates that you assess whether you can safely remove yourself from the situation before resorting to force that could potentially harm or kill another person.
Minnesota follows this principle, setting itself apart from states with ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws. While some states allow individuals to use deadly force without requiring them to retreat if they feel threatened, Minnesota’s law imposes a higher standard of responsibility on individuals to de-escalate and avoid violence whenever possible.
In fact, a bill that would have expanded the right of Minnesotans to use force in self-defense “regardless of whether a reasonable possibility of retreat to avoid the danger exists” failed in the House just this spring.
(By the way, it took us all of five minutes of research to learn these facts, even without “legal” in our title.)
There’s another wrinkle to this. Those of us who weren’t born yesterday remember when mainstream media types such as Gerstein were appalled by “stand your ground” laws, not hinting about how they could be used against journalists.
These laws – which are active in 30 states – gained national attention after George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in 2012 and cited Florida’s “stand your ground law” as his defense.
The press went into overtime, not only decrying such laws but also viciously attacking the American Legislative Exchange Council, which had promoted them, which then led to a multitude of corporate backers pulling funds from ALEC.
We don’t expect that Politico will follow our advice and send Josh Gerstein packing over an X post. Too bad, because it would be a small step toward restoring the credibility of mainstream journalism.
— Written by the I&I Editorial Board
Support Independent Journalism
Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.
We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left.
We are 100% reader supported!!
If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.
And be sure to tell your friends!
I don’t know about fired, as he seems to fit the Politico low-credibility brand. Of course the proper “defense” against journalism is better journalism, and along with being called out for equating journalism with physical threats and implying a self-defense law from some other states would apply to investigative journalism he should also be corrected on the misleading description of “home” daycares.
There have been many reports that Zimmerman did not use any Stand Your Ground law. And that he never even contemplated it. It wouldn’t have made sense in his case anyway. Self defence is what made sense.
It was only the leftist media and politicians that kept saying he was going to use stand your ground. They knew it did not apply. They knew he wasn’t going to use it. Their false claim was just an underhanded way to garner opposition to the law.
Nah, leave him alone. He perfectly characterizes Politico, the liberal propaganda mouthpiece that he works for. Think of him as Politico’s poster boy.
Zimmerman DID NOT use “stand your ground” in his defense.
A Stand Your Ground defense would have pre-empted a trial.
As seasoned journalists, you should have known this
Yet one more example of why the left, and everyone who supports them, is hopelessly bankrupt ethically, morally and intellectually and are traitors to our country.
“…it would be a small step toward restoring the credibility of mainstream journalism.”
Nope, that ship has sailed.