Issues & Insights
Politico reporter Josh Gerstein. Screenshot

Politico Should Fire Josh Gerstein

Just how corrupt are journalists these days? Consider this example from earlier in the week involving the explosive Minnesota fraud scandal โ€“ the one the mainstream media covered up for years and is now busy trying to downplay.

On Tuesday, Josh Gerstein, a โ€œsenior legal affairs reporterโ€ for Politico, weighed in in response to the Nick Shirley video, in which the amateur journalist took his camera to various empty taxpayer-supported โ€œday care centersโ€ that were obvious fronts.

Instead of expressing outrage that fraudsters were stealing massive amounts of money meant to support poor families โ€“ and his colleagues in the mainstream press got scooped by a kid โ€“ Gerstein issued a veiled threat to people like Shirley.

โ€œAt some point,โ€ he posted  on X, โ€œthe amateur effort to knock on doors of home daycares intersects with robust stand-your-ground laws.โ€

That prompted a tsunami of angry responses, including one from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which said, โ€œYou would think a โ€˜Senior Legal Affairs Reporterโ€™ for POLITICO would know better than to tweet something inciting violence against federal agents.โ€

Gerstein tried to backpedal a little, saying, โ€œTo observe that something is likely to happen or thereโ€™s a serious risk of it happening is not to advocate for it happening.โ€


RELATED: “What Nick Shirleyโ€™s Minnesota Fraud Story Says About Legacy Media


But that just proves Gerstein โ€“ a pedigreed journalist who’d previously been with CNN, ABC News, and the New York Sun โ€“ is woefully ignorant as well as recklessly irresponsible.

Because, despite what Gerstein claims, Minnesota doesnโ€™t even have a โ€œstand your groundโ€ law โ€“ much less a โ€œrobustโ€ one. It does, however, have a โ€œduty to retreatโ€ law.

Hereโ€™s how one law firm explains Minnesotaโ€™s law:

Essentially, if youโ€™re attacked, the law mandates that you assess whether you can safely remove yourself from the situation before resorting to force that could potentially harm or kill another person.

Minnesota follows this principle, setting itself apart from states with ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws. While some states allow individuals to use deadly force without requiring them to retreat if they feel threatened, Minnesota’s law imposes a higher standard of responsibility on individuals to de-escalate and avoid violence whenever possible.

In fact, a bill that would have expanded the right of Minnesotans to use force in self-defense โ€œregardless of whether a reasonable possibility of retreat to avoid the danger existsโ€ failed in the House just this spring.

(By the way, it took us all of five minutes of research to learn these facts, even without โ€œlegalโ€ in our title.)

Thereโ€™s another wrinkle to this. Those of us who werenโ€™t born yesterday remember when mainstream media types such as Gerstein were appalled by โ€œstand your groundโ€ laws, not hinting about how they could be used against journalists.

These laws โ€“ which are active in 30 states โ€“ gained national attention after George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in 2012 and cited Floridaโ€™s โ€œstand your ground lawโ€ as his defense.

The press went into overtime, not only decrying such laws but also viciously attacking the American Legislative Exchange Council, which had promoted them, which then led to a multitude of corporate backers pulling funds from ALEC.

We donโ€™t expect that Politico will follow our advice and send Josh Gerstein packing over an X post. Too bad, because it would be a small step toward restoring the credibility of mainstream journalism.

โ€” Written by the I&I Editorial Board

Share

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

6 comments

  • I don’t know about fired, as he seems to fit the Politico low-credibility brand. Of course the proper “defense” against journalism is better journalism, and along with being called out for equating journalism with physical threats and implying a self-defense law from some other states would apply to investigative journalism he should also be corrected on the misleading description of “home” daycares.

  • There have been many reports that Zimmerman did not use any Stand Your Ground law. And that he never even contemplated it. It wouldn’t have made sense in his case anyway. Self defence is what made sense.
    It was only the leftist media and politicians that kept saying he was going to use stand your ground. They knew it did not apply. They knew he wasn’t going to use it. Their false claim was just an underhanded way to garner opposition to the law.

  • Nah, leave him alone. He perfectly characterizes Politico, the liberal propaganda mouthpiece that he works for. Think of him as Politico’s poster boy.

  • Zimmerman DID NOT use “stand your ground” in his defense.

    A Stand Your Ground defense would have pre-empted a trial.

    As seasoned journalists, you should have known this

  • Yet one more example of why the left, and everyone who supports them, is hopelessly bankrupt ethically, morally and intellectually and are traitors to our country.

  • “…it would be a small step toward restoring the credibility of mainstream journalism.”

    Nope, that ship has sailed.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs.ย 

Share

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading