Issues & Insights
Screenshot.

Liberals Learn To Fear Big Government — But For All The Wrong Reasons

Turns out that the left does understand the dangers inherent in a big central government amassing lots of information on private citizens. But, weirdly, only when it comes to protecting noncitizens who are here illegally.

A story in Politico tells the tale of a nationwide license plate recognition system billed “as a program to root out criminal activity on local streets, with its cameras already installed in more than 6,000 municipalities nationally.”

It goes on to point out that many blue cities and towns are cancelling their contracts with the program out of fear that “the cameras themselves pose the bigger danger for their cities, offering federal law enforcement a back door for tracking residents’ movements.”

It’s not federal law enforcement, per se, that has these liberal cities and towns worried, but the Trump administration. Cambridge, Mass., for example, voted to pause the program just months after approving it because its “unease deepened … amid the Trump administration’s intensifying immigration crackdown.”

Politico, naturally, doesn’t bother to point out that the administration’s crackdown isn’t on “immigration.” It’s on illegal immigration. And it’s not a “crackdown.” Trump is simply enforcing existing immigration laws that previous administrations ignored, and which involve removing those who entered the country illegally.

But to liberals, this license plate tracking system is a Big Government bridge too far. And they are willing to sacrifice whatever public safety benefits it has to offer actual American citizens to make sure that, as Cambridge Vice Mayor Marc McGovern put it, “we’re taking their [i.e., illegal immigrants’] concerns and their fears into account.”

Yes, heaven forbid we fail to do everything in our power to make sure those who snuck across the border illegally – rather than follow the law – feel safe and warm.

These are the same people, mind you, who were freaking out that America didn’t have a “contact tracing system” in place during the COVID-19 outbreak so the government could track and confine American citizens.

The same people who want the government to censor content they don’t like, to deny people jobs and opportunity for wrong-think, to dictate what we can and can’t drive, how we cook our food, what kind of lightbulbs we see by. They are the ones who want the federal government freed of its constitutional constraints.

These are people, in other words, who never seem to have a problem with a big, central government monitoring, tracking, or controlling American citizens.

For them to suddenly recoil because they worry that this power could be abused would be amusing if it weren’t so pathetic.

So, news flash for liberals (and for those “national conservatives” who want to enlist big government to achieve their “conservative” ends) out there: Any power handed to the federal government can and will be abused. If not now, then by someone down the road, who will use it to do things you find abhorrent.

That is why the Founders created a system of checks and balances specifically and purposefully designed to limit and constrain federal power.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

4 comments

  • I think it’s interesting that people will support an idea if “their side” is implementing it, but will oppose the same idea if it’s “the other side” doing it.

  • The boot of big government thats ends up squashing your life in the USA is coming, if you are dumb enough to keep voting for the corrupt Democrats.

  • According to the Politico article, the Flock camera spokesperson said only 20 cities/towns have opted out or paused the program. That’s out of thousands; more cities are coming online. Also note the cities involved are all Deep Blue and the quotes from Dems are newsworthy (and quite funny given their obsequiousness to illegal persons living in America). Calling a plate-reading system “racist” is where the Dem party is and will remain as long as they engage in destructive identity politics.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading