Issues & Insights
Screenshot

Dems Fight To Protect A $600 Billion Medicaid Tax Scam That Joe Biden Tried To Kill

Before Texas’ embarrassment of a congressman, Al Green, was kicked out of the House chamber during President Donald Trump’s address on Tuesday, he shouted “You have no mandate to cut Medicaid!” while pointing a cane at Trump.

Green is dead wrong. Trump does have a mandate. And it comes from none other than Joe Biden.

Republicans are looking at substantial spending cuts to help reduce the nearly $2 trillion deficit and keep the economy moving. And one big, fat, juicy target for savings is a Medicaid funding scam that lets states steal tens of billions of dollars from the federal government every year.

Here’s how this particular scam works.

States tax health care providers and use those funds to help cover their Medicaid costs. Then, the states turn around and increase what they pay these same providers for Medicaid benefits – effectively covering the cost of the tax. Then, because of the way Medicaid is financed, the states can bill the federal government for half of the spending increase.

Let’s say, for example, a state imposes a provider tax on hospitals that raises $100 million. And then it returns that $100 million to the hospitals in the form of higher Medicaid reimbursement rates. There’s been no increase in benefits. Providers aren’t better off. But the state gets an extra $50 million from the federal government’s matching fund, money that it can use for anything it wants. (The fed pays states up to 90% to cover the cost of expanding Medicaid under Obamacare.)

An Oregon state representative once called it a “dream tax.” States can use Medicaid to steal money from the federal treasury. It’s such a wonderful dream that Alaska is the only state in the nation that hasn’t leveraged it.

We’re not talking pennies here. The Congressional Budget Office figures that the 10-year cost of this tax scam is more than $600 billion, which is almost exactly what Republicans are eyeing in savings from Medicaid. Provider taxes are now the second largest source of funds for Medicaid.

Take California, which is the premier abuser of this scam. The state’s budget projects $119 billion in federal Medicaid funds – more than Florida’s entire budget – an increase of $11 billion from the prior year.  American Commitment President Phil Kerpen notes that the increase alone is bigger than Nevada’s entire state budget.

And California makes clear who is picking up the tab, talking about a tax it imposes on state insurers: “While the tax is charged to health insurance plans, most of the burden of the cost of paying the tax falls on the federal government.

This isn’t a new problem, either, and it’s one that both Democrats and Republicans have tried to fix for decades.

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, states using this gimmick pushed federal Medicaid spending up by 20% a year, resulting in a 1991 law aimed at curtailing the practice. But it didn’t work. From 2008 to 2015, for example, provider tax revenue doubled and the federal share of Medicaid spending climbed from 57% to 63%.

“Both George W. Bush and the Obama administrations recognized the problem of provider taxes and proposed limiting the amount that states could raise through them,” noted Brian Blase in a 2016 article published in Forbes.

Now, here’s the kicker.

In Bob Woodward’s 2011 book, “The Price of Politics,” he writes about budget negotiations during the Obama administration and notes that Republicans brought up the issue of Medicaid provider taxes with then-Vice President Joe Biden. Here’s how Woodward recounts the scene:

It’s a scam, Biden agreed. The states were gaming the system, taxing doctors and hospitals so they could get federal reimbursements and then returning the money to providers. Let’s call it like it is, and let’s just do this … It could save $40 billion. ‘If we can’t do this,’ the vice president said, ‘come on!’

Someone needs to ask Green – and by extension the rest of today’s corrupt Democratic party – why he’s willing to face congressional censure to defend a $600 billion tax scam that even Joe Biden has decried. Maybe follow Green around the Capitol, screaming the question while waving a cane in his face.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

9 comments

  • This article is off-base. The provider tax is just one way to finance a Medicaid program at the state level, but there are specific caps and limits on its use in federal law. The article seems to laud Florida for not engaging in Medicaid waste in comparison to California (California spends at least 3 times as much as Florida on Medicaid), but Florida (and Texas as well) uses these types of taxes. Bottom line: some states like Florida and Texas spend judiciously, and some states spend indiscriminately, and this tax is irrelevant to that equation. Cutting this provider tax will ironically punish Florida and Texas. That’s just stupid.

    • The article points out that Alaska is the only state that isn’t using this tax scam. And your claim that ending it will “punish” states like Texas and Florida is misguided. It will only prevent states from using the tax to artificially boost federal matching funds. Let Texans pay the health costs of Texas’ poor.

    • Please tell me: why should providers be taxed? The original intent of Medicaid was that everyone in the public be taxed in order to pay providers at lower marginal rated just so the low income public would receive good care.

    • Is the quality of health care three times better in California than in Florida?

  • Bottom line is that if Medicaid reimbursement rates are not maintained/increased, there will be no providers (except the very worst) available to perform services.

    • As I read it, this process allows the state to receive from the feds 150% of the amount they reimburse the providers. They can then use the excess as they determine.

  • In my state illegals are entitled to Medicaid funds on an “emergency” basis. So there’s a fuzzy criteria you can drive a truck through. All of it beefs up the money Maryland gets back from the feds. Truly, yet another scam uncovered.

  • And there are quite a lot of patients and providers filing false claims. Lots of $ there that can be better used to provide health care.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading