If there is any doubt in your mind that the American media, which I personally and fondly refer to as the media hivemind, practices censorship as I and countless others have pointed out, then look at the Washington Post suggesting the Biden regime prevent Elon Musk’s interview of Donald Trump, and look also at the hysterical headlines after the interview.

For that matter, look at what’s going on in Britain.

Oh, wait. You can’t.

There is a concerted effort by the media hivemind in America to build a Berlin Wall over this past week’s events in the United Kingdom. Deep down, the rulers of Western Europe are worried of another 1848, just as the elites in the U. S. are terrified of another, bigger, Jan. 6. The censorship here in America is due to fear that the resistance in the U.K. will spread to this country and Americans will finally grow a backbone. If it does, expect our leftist government to respond the same way. Birds of a feather.

The U.K. Upheaval

The straw that broke the camel’s back in the U.K. was the son of one of the millions and millions and millions of savages that the elites welcomed into Britain (and Ireland, and France, and Germany and America against their citizens’ objections), stabbed to death three little girls at a dance group. This crime was similar to one in Ireland. Many Brits are infuriated. They massed in protests and some even tried to set fire to a place that housed the savages in Rotherham. 

Days later, another of these savages stabbed a little girl and her mother in Londonistan (mind you, no sign of the feminists).

Leeds, Manchester, Liverpool, Londonistan and other cities in Airstrip One have been rocked by riots. In some places the Union Jack and the Irish flag were flown together in desperate recognition of their countries’ mutual enemies: at the illegal immigrants entering their countries with hatred and sole desire to rape and pillage, and at their governments that encourage the migrants to enter, and which give them special privileges while depriving those privileges from their own citizens. This situation followed years of gang rapes by Muslim savages, persecution of free speech, and listing several areas of cities as protected Muslim enclaves.  

Gangs of Muslim savages are also roaming the cities, armed with knives, machetes and clubs, attacking British citizens. They have been joined, in spirit at least, by members of the ruling party, Ingsoc, and their Blackshirts (aka, Antifa). In at least one instance, the police were handing out refreshments to those Muslim savages causing havoc. Without saying so, Muslims are being used to keep their own citizens oppressed, and, for the destruction of British culture, history, values, and country.

The BBC has reacted by censoring news of savages acting like savages and instead focused favorably on the “anti-Fascists” opposing the British people. As in Canada, as in America, the BBC is full of propaganda peddlers.

Just as predictable, the Ingsoc government expressed indignation only at – wait for it – “the far right.” It is all the fault of the “far right.” According to Nigel Farage, that was the fanatic ruler’s set in stone view. In particular, prominent dissidents such as Tommy Robinson and Katie Hopkins are considered enemies of the state. In the recent massive protests, Tommy exulted at the people coming together in spite of the elites’ attempt at divide and conquer.

Nonetheless, the police, the government, and the BBC focus their animus on their own citizens, the Ingsoc prime minister promising to institute total censorship of the internet, and build more prisons and jails – for political prisoners. That is on top of the censorship already existing (incremental totalitarianism). The irony is that the constables who are white and are carrying out the oppression are being passed over in favor of the sacred minorities.

The rulers of Airstrip One are fanatics, of course, and attempts at reasoning with them is a waste of time.

But the purpose of this little essay of mine is regarding the enforcers of the regime announcing in an incongruous, soporific manner by an apparatchik the proposal of extending its prosecution of thoughtcrime by intending to extradite and imprison anyone abroad who states something that the Ingsoc regime does not like. This includes America and Canada. And Brazil and Japan. And India and Australia. And Italy and …

As one individual in Newsmax pointed out, “In the history of the world, when have the ones imposing censorship been the good guys?”

I’ll Be Your Huckleberry

So, I will now provoke these wannabe totalitarians.

To the British people who wish to prevent the ultimate destruction of your country:

It matters little whether you vote for the Conservative Party or the Ingsoc Party. Together, they comprise the Uniparty and each branch is a matter of degree when it comes to policies. They just take turns eating at the trough. This is not unique to Airstrip One but is found in other countries as well.

Quite frankly, the solution is another 1848 – with specific goals. Now, some say that violence is not the answer. I disagree. Violence IS the answer. Some say that violence has never solved anything. Those people have obviously never read history. Violence is the answer when you play by the rules and the other side does not. Violence is the answer when the most elementary rights are flagrantly violated with no means of address and no repercussions. Violence is the answer when an arrogant elite is in charge of the country and has nothing but contempt for ordinary citizens. Violence is the answer when the law is violated and/or deliberately maladministered, as in a two-tier system of justice. Violence is the answer when the police mindlessly cooperate to suppress their fellow citizens and the citizens’ rights with the excuse that they are just doing their job or are just following orders. Violence is the answer when the courts are used to punish dissenters. Violence is the answer when the regime allows criminals to invade the country and even rewards them for doing so. Violence is the answer when those same criminals brutalize and murder your fellow citizens. Violence is the answer when the avenues of information are blocked, and others are allowed so that they can spew out propaganda. Violence is the answer when elections are fraudulent.

But the violence must have specific targets, e.g., in this particular instance it would involve targeting the luxury hotels where the immigrants are being housed, targeting the BBC to end the propaganda, etc. There must also be specific ultimate goals that must be implemented immediately once the elites are brought down to their knees. Do not make the mistake of the victors of 1848 that relied on the promises of the elites to reform. Stamina and persistence are vital.

Or, if violence is not your cup of tea, there is such a thing as a general strike.

But you know what would be a really good idea? If it was coordinated to take place at the same time across borders, in the Continent. Just like 1848.

And keep in mind as the elites encounter greater and greater pushback, the more repressive they will become until one side collapses.

Well, that should do it. If the above isn’t an excuse for the regime’s tentacles to stretch out and bring me in, I don’t know what is. I hope someone forwards this to the proper authorities.

Come and get me.

But remember, the last time you tried something like this, we kicked your asses.

Wankers.

Armando Simón is a trilingual native of Cuba, a retired psychologist, and author of “The Book of Many Books”  and “The U.“

NOTE: The views expressed by Guest Contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the I&I Editorial Board.