
Creators https://www.creators.com/author/michael-ramirez
See the entire I&I collection of two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Michael Ramirez here.

Creators https://www.creators.com/author/michael-ramirez
See the entire I&I collection of two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Michael Ramirez here.
Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.
We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left.
We are 100% reader supported!!
If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.

And be sure to tell your friends!
Michael Ramirez is a two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist with the Las Vegas Review-Journal. His cartoons are syndicated by Creators. Michael won his second Pulitzer while at Investor's Business Daily.
Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs.
Copyright © 2026, Issues & Insights LLC. Created by Meks. Powered by WordPress.com.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Worst SCOTUS in modern history.
Hey Ramierz, Biden has committed crimes already but you pretend you don’t know that.
Are you really that ignorant! Try reading the actual opinion instead of blindly parroting the democrat talking point.
Sir, it isn’t a search for a perfect POTUS. This is protection against the mobs, the political opponents, the foreign operatives that can hobble and disrupt any administration. I give you 2016-2020 for example. This isn’t for love of Trump. This is for protection from bad actors and boy, do we have lots of those. Obama will embrace such protection so his involvements with Iran don’t send him to prison.
This is one of your occasional mischaracterizations of what actually occurred. That is not what the SCOTUS decision said and you know it. You do know it apples to Biden as well…
Regarding the cloud-blurb: I guess President’s are sorta like cartoonists in that regard.
The difference is that there is a distinction seen in the official duties of the President (since if he commits a crime than we all abet since he represents all of us, even though not every citizen votes for him).
I suppose another difference is the SC seeing that if the President commits an act that would normally be criminal in the wake of performing his official duties, then the act is considered a mistake (not intentional or reckless) and is not criminal.
This would not be the case if a criminal act was performed in an non-official sphere. For instance, if the President assaulted someone on the streets of America or if a cartoonist committed slander.
Good lord. What ignorance.