Issues & Insights
White House recording device at the Nixon Presidential Library and Museum. Photo by Jeremy Thompson, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

Shades Of Nixon: Biden Refuses To Turn Over Potentially Devastating Tapes

Almost exactly 50 years ago, the Supreme Court ordered President Richard Nixon to turn over White House tapes that he had refused to release for nearly a year, citing executive privilege. On July 24, 1974, the court unanimously rejected Nixonโ€™s executive privilege claim. Sixteen days later, Nixon resigned.

Fast forward to this year, and President Joe Biden is refusing to release tapes of his interviews with Special Counsel Robert Hur about his handling of classified documents, citing, as Nixon did, executive privilege, with an added twist about the risk of “deep fakes.”

Biden is, in fact, so determined to keep the tapes secret that heโ€™s willing to let his attorney general get slapped with contempt of Congress, a charge two House committees advanced on Thursday for Garland’s refusal to comply with a congressional subpoena.

The White House is also being sued by the Heritage Foundation, Judicial Watch, and a dozen news organizations โ€“ including CNN and the Associated Press โ€“ for access to the tapes after the White House refused to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests. ย 

The Biden administration argues that thereโ€™s no reason to turn over the tapes since the transcripts are already out.

But last Friday, the administration admitted that the transcripts had been altered.

That admission came in response to Heritage’s lawsuit. The White House told a federal court that the transcripts were โ€œaccurate โ€ฆ except for minor instances.โ€

In response to that, Heritageโ€™s Oversight Project posted on X that: โ€œAfter being forced into federal court by us, the White House admits they altered evidence to make Biden appear less incompetent This case has been blown wide open.โ€

The White House response was to label Heritageโ€™s assertion a โ€œtotal lie.โ€ But Biden has already been caught lying about what he told Hur, so why should anyone trust this administration when it says the transcripts are accurate?

Indeed, the more the White House fights the release of these tapes, the weaker its case becomes.

If releasing the transcript didnโ€™t fall under an executive privilege claim, how in the world does the actual recording?

The idea that AI is the reason for withholding this evidence is completely ludicrous. Anyone with skills could use the transcript as the basis for โ€œdeep fakes.โ€ If anything, releasing the audio would make it harder to get away with deep fakes because the actual recording would be widely available.

And if Heritage is lying about the White House doctoring the transcript, then prove it by releasing the tape!

The public’s right to have access to these tapes became more urgent this week after the Wall Street Journal reported that in small, private meetings, Bidenโ€™s mental acuity is often terrible โ€“ that heโ€™s frequently inaudible, confused, and sleepy.

This is a side of Biden that the White House โ€“ with the willing participation of the mainstream press โ€“ has meticulously kept hidden.


See Also:

Release The Biden Transcripts Now

Media Gaslight The Public About The Disastrous Biden Transcripts


As the Journal reports: โ€œAmericans have had minimal opportunities to see Biden in unscripted moments. By the end of April, he had given fewer interviews and press conferences than any of his recent predecessors โ€ฆ His last wide-ranging town-hall-style meeting with an independent news outlet was in October 2021.โ€ The Journal further notes that Biden has also sharply cut back on small meetings with lawmakers.

So, getting access to these tapes isnโ€™t just about embarrassing the president. The public has the right to know just how incapacitated Biden is before they decide whether to return him to office.

In the end, Biden, like Nixon before him, is likely to lose his effort to keep these tapes hidden from the public. In Nixonโ€™s case, that sealed his fate. Will the same be true for Biden?

โ€” Written by the I&I Editorial Board

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

6 comments

  • While it’s entirely possible that there really isn’t anything to see/hear in the tapes, the more the WH drags its feet and resists their release, the deeper the suspicion becomes that the tapes contain a “smoking gun”. For that matter, the more Biden is sequestered and kept from all but the most controlled events, the deeper the suspicion that he’s hiding or being hidden from public exposure. The little we do (are allowed to?) see certainly isn’t comforting.

  • I thought it was embarrassing for Attorney General Merrick Garland to make the claim about AI being able to be implemented to create deep fakes about what was actually said, while at the same time only making available the fake “transcript” of the interview.

  • Biden was put in place precisely because he is an incompetent, senile old man who can be manipulated. The Democrats do not want a president who is intelligent and capable because they cannot manipulate that kind of person.

  • What takes Congress so long to file lawsuits

    How is this not in front of a judge already

  • Wonโ€™t someone just leak them ? Nothing is secure these days and whistleblowers lurk about every corner.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs.ย 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading