Issues & Insights
Source: The Federalist. Published under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/).

3 Out Of 4 Americans Worried About Illegals Voting In U.S. Elections: I&I/TIPP Poll

Not all politicians agree that the surge of illegal entrants across our border threatens American citizens’ right to vote and self-govern without foreign interference. But those elected officials who don’t believe it’s an issue are very much out of tune with U.S. opinion, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll shows. Americans are very concerned and want something to be done about it.

The March national online I&I/TIPP Poll of 1,419 adult registered voters, taken from Feb. 28 to March 1, asked Americans: “How concerned are you about letting those who are in the U.S. illegally to participate in local and federal elections?”

The response was a landslide, with 71% saying they were either “very concerned” (50%) or “somewhat concerned” (21%) about the problem, while just 23% said they were “not very concerned” (13%) or “not at all concerned” (10%).

Most striking about the responses was their breadth, with a significant majority in virtually every demographic category saying it is a matter of concern. Groups that ordinarily differ strongly with one another find common ground here.

That includes Democrats (60% concerned to 32% not), Republicans (89% to 7%), independents (66% to 28%), whites (75% to 21%), blacks (63% to 25%), Hispanics (60% to 29%), high school graduates (69% to 22%), those with a college degree (74% to 21%) and even those with post-college training or degrees (70% to 25%).

Indeed, only one group out of the 36 demographic categories regularly followed by I&I/TIPP was below 50%: self-described “liberals,” though even there a plurality (49% to 43%) thought that illegals either voting or holding office was of concern. Self-described conservatives were highest (90% to 9%) while those calling themselves moderates were overall slightly above average (73% to 22%).

But I&I/TIPP asked an additional question: “What do you think should be done?” Those answering could choose either or both of the first two responses, so the numbers add up to more than 100%.

Respondents were given three possible responses: “Rigorously vet voter records to ensure non-citizens don’t vote,” “End programs like automatic voter registration and limit voting by mail to protect the integrity of U.S. citizens’ right to vote,” and “Not sure.”

The first possible response garnered the greatest support, at 60%. The second response regarding voter registration and limiting mail-in voting won 43% support. Among the remainder, 12% weren’t sure.

Breaking it down further, Democrats came in at 59% (“vet voter records) to 29% (“end automatic voter registration” and “limit voting by mail”), with 19%, or nearly one in five, answering “Not sure.” On the same questions Republicans broke 62% to 54%, with 6% not sure, versus independents, at 58% to 44%, with 14% not sure.

One interesting split: Age. The younger the voter, the less likely they were to favor carefully looking at voter records: For those 18-24, just 47% supported that answer, while it was 51% for those 25-44, 63% for those 45-64, and 72% for those over 65.

The reverse was also true. Young people tended to favor the “end automatic registration” and “limit voting by mail” answers, with support from 55% of those 18-24, 51% of those 25-44, 39% of those 45 to 64, and just 35% of those over 65.

The lesson to be drawn from these data? Across the board, Americans think illegal immigrants voting in our elections is a potential problem, and a solid majority would support common-sense solutions to ensure it doesn’t happen.

There are currently more than 10 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. and likely millions more given the record surge across our borders over the last three years. Counting them all is nearly impossible.

Concerns over these illegal entrants becoming a reliable voting bloc for the the left, in particular the Democratic Party, have grown in recent years, particularly as the stakes of presidential elections seem to have grown along with tight election results.

As former Border Patrol Agent Mark A. Hewitt recently wrote, “the actual number that are in the country isn’t known, ten million seems to be a farcical number, but however many are in the United States they are just a single signature away from getting amnesty. Meaning today’s illegal alien is tomorrow’s Democrat voter.”

Former President Donald Trump has warned for years about the threat of illegal immigrants voting in U.S. elections. He brought the topic up again in early January, saying “I think they really are doing it because they want to sign these people up to vote. I really do. They can’t speak a word of English for the most part, but they’re signing them up.”

Elon Musk, who has in the past identified himself as a progressive, last week posted a two-minute video from self-described “anti-communist” Western Lensman outlining with the alarming tagline, “This is actually happening!”

According to Musk’s X account, the video piled up 68 million views in just five days. It’s gone viral.

The video’s assertions are straightforward, if alarming, about the surge in illegal immigration totaling, by some estimates based on government data, 10 million just since Biden took office:

1. Flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world, enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual U.S. states so far.

2. Prioritize the needs of these millions of non-citizens over the needs of American citizens with free flights, busses, hotels, meals and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them.

3. Keep them in the country at all costs, even when they commit violent crimes like murder or rape. Attack the language used to describe the criminals as opposed to the criminals themselves. Slander critics as racist.

4. Ensure their privileges are made irreversible with city and state sanctuary laws that act as population magnets. Codify permanent status and ensure non-cooperation with ICE.

5. Count the non-citizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the House of Representatives. As of now, they would equal 13 extra Congressional districts, a tremendous amount of electoral power.

6. Launch a massive, heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail-in ballots. No signature verification or proof of citizenship requirements, making it almost impossible to prove voter fraud.

7. Lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat Party.

8. Win elections.

9. Entrenched single-party rule has been achieved.

Tennessee U.S. Sen. Bill Hagerty, in particular, has warned about the potential impact that illegal immigrants have on the fairness of the U.S. presidential vote. Even if they don’t actually cast ballots, which is against the law in federal elections, illegal inhabitants are still counted for apportionment of congressional seats and Electoral College votes.

That gives the estimated 20 “Sanctuary City” jurisdictions in major cities, mostly in Blue States, a decided advantage in political strength. Hagerty co-sponsored an amendment to the recent spending bill to keep the government from from counting illegal aliens for the Census. But it was rejected with unanimous opposition from Senate Democrats.

Whatever numbers one believes, and both sides in the debate have wildly different estimates for the amount of illegal immigration, the I&I/TIPP Poll shows the concerns over illegal immigrants voting in U.S. elections are not going away. And they appear to be a major part of the general electorate’s anger over undocumented immigration.


I&I/TIPP publishes timely, unique, and informative data each month on topics of public interest. TIPP’s reputation for polling excellence comes from being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill O’Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTV’s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

6 comments

  • “How concerned are you about letting those who are in the U.S. illegally to participate in local and federal elections?”

    What a badly worded question–worded to increase people’s fears. It conflates several different questions:

    Are people who are in the U.S. illegally being allowed to vote in local elections?

    Are they being allowed to vote in federal elections?

    Are they actually voting in federal elections?

    How concerned are you about what is happening?

    How concerned are you about what might happen in the future?

    • Does it diminish the vote of the American citizen? Does it have an unfair influence to commit “theft” from retirees or working Americans by increasing taxes on those who work to support those who could but don’t? Where’s the tipping point? How many people can those who work support, is it a 100:1 ratio or is it 10:1, where does the system break down all together and those who planned become demoralized? Maybe that’s the point.

  • Not only will the illegals vote, they will vote multiple times. Illegals are registering to vote in every state they visit courtesy of the NGOs.

  • The following is a necessarily incomplete list of things whose votes I fear might throw the election:

    • illegal aliens
    • children
    • nonexistent persons
    • the deceased
    • foreigners
    • Xerox machines at Kinko’s

  • I&I writes that only 3 out of four Americans worry about illegal aliens voting in 2024.
    Sadly to say, I’ll bet the other 1/4th who don’t worry are the illegal aliens.

  • Why only 3 out of 4? And I’m starting think, maybe we need to raise the voting age to 25, just shaking my head.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
Share

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading