
Creators https://www.creators.com/author/michael-ramirez
See the entire I&I collection of two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Michael Ramirez here.

Creators https://www.creators.com/author/michael-ramirez
See the entire I&I collection of two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Michael Ramirez here.
Michael Ramirez is a two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist with the Las Vegas Review-Journal. His cartoons are syndicated by Creators. Michael won his second Pulitzer while at Investor's Business Daily.
Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs.
Copyright © 2026, Issues & Insights LLC. Created by Meks. Powered by WordPress.com.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Issues & Insights was built by the team behind the legendary Investor’s Business Daily editorial page.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
If Michael Ramirez could put aside his obsession with Donald Trump for a minute, he might have spent some time finding out exactly what the difference between the presidential primary and caucus in Nevada is precisely.
The presidential primary was established by the Dems, is nothing more than an advisory “beauty contest” and has no bearing on the process by which delegates to the party national conventions are chosen. That has ALWAYS been done by the precinct caucus process–and what they won’t tell you is that the Dems have caucuses too. They are REQUIRED by state law.
I lived in Nevada for fifteen years. In 2008 I was GOP chairman in Lyon County and organized the caucuses there. The media back then was promoting the notion that this was a new wrinkle in the process, but it was nothing of the sort. What were now referred to as “caucuses” ALWAYS conducted, just called “precinct meetings” previously.
The disconnect between primary and caucus is the result of the media reporting only the results of the presidential straw poll conducted there, rather than tabulating the number of precinct delegates elected and supporting various presidential candidates. THAT, and the adoption of resolutions ultimately to be synthesized into the party’s national platform, is the most important order of business at the caucus.
The disconnect is further magnified by the number of participants who show up, cast their straw poll vote, and then leave immediately. In 2012 my precinct caucus in Dayton, Nevada cast a straw poll vote favoring Mitt Romney, but elected delegates supporting Ron Paul, because the latter’s supporters stuck around long enough to do that.
The common-sense solution would be to hold the straw poll as the last item of business, so that participants would have to stick around to the end, and the straw poll results and delegates elected would reflect the same level of support for candidates represented. I don’t expect the Nevada GOP to recognize this, as my experience back then is sadly comparable to current practice.
But I do expect Ramirez to do his homework.