Issues & Insights
COVID-19 virus. Source: Centers for Disease Control

The COVID Wars: A Rebuttal

Editor’s note: Below is Dr. Henry Miller’s response to an article by Armando Simón that was critical of Miller’s previous COVID-related post.

Armando Simón, a retired psychologist, attempts to rebut a recent article of mine which criticized Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo for his dangerous, anti-vaccine, anti-mask views and policies. Although Simón is entitled to his opinions, he is not entitled to fabricate his own facts, which he does repeatedly. Many of them are demonstrably false:

  • He says, for example, that “COVID shots are not true vaccines in that they do not contain inert pathogens as is usually the case, but involve a novel treatment using mRNA.” In fact, vaccines began to move away from “inert pathogens” as the active moiety more than 35 years ago. The active moiety of the hepatitis B vaccine Recombivax was (and is) the virus’ surface antigen; it was approved by the FDA in 1986.  (I was one of the reviewers.)  Other “subunit” vaccines based on a protein component of the virus have followed, including the pertussis and shingles vaccines. The Novavax COVID-19 vaccine (brand names: Covovax and Nuvaxovid) are subunit vaccines. 
  • Simón claims the COVID vaccines “did not go through the usual, mandatory, series of trials because of the hyperpanic that ensued,” blah, blah, blah. As for the supposedly exaggerated “hyperpanic,” let me remind him that, during the year in which the vaccines were being tested, “The official 350,831 COVID-19 deaths [in the U.S.] for 2020 reflects deaths in which COVID was the underlying cause of death.” More to the point, the vaccines did go through extensive preclinical and clinical trials. Each was tested in more than 30,000 human subjects and found to be extraordinarily safe and effective, with efficacy measured by the ability to prevent (1) a positive PCR test for the virus, and (2) at least one symptom. As of April 26, 2023, approximately 81.3% of the U.S. population – more than 275 million people – had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Even when those vaccines failed to stop transmission, they significantly lowered the frequency of serious illness, hospitalization, and death.
  • Simón quotes the notoriously incompetent Ladapo (whose name Simón misspells repeatedly, by the way) as “stating that the new boosters have had no clinical trials prior to putting them on the market, yet they are being promoted.” Neither of them seems to understand that new, updated versions of vaccines based on a previously proven platform are not subjected to large placebo-controlled trials, in part because they’re not necessary, but more important, because often they’re not possible.

Why is that? As I noted above, the original COVID vaccines were tested at the height of the pandemic in clinical trials of more than 30,000 subjects each. There were huge numbers of infections occurring throughout the country, so it was not difficult to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in infection rate, hospitalizations, and deaths between the vaccinated and placebo-controlled groups. I read the lengthy summaries of the clinical trials that FDA presented to its advisory committee, and I agreed with the regulators and their external advisers that there was overwhelming evidence of safety and efficacy. But now, with the number of cases lower and some urgency about making available the new round of vaccines — which differ only by the substitution of a new piece of messenger RNA that directs the synthesis of a spike protein in order to elicit an immune response to the new, circulating variants — there isn’t time to mount huge trials to demonstrate prevention of infection and/or serious disease.

Instead, therefore, the vaccines are tested in animal models — vaccinated and unvaccinated animals challenged with virus — to demonstrate prevention of infection, and on a small number of human subjects (without a virus challenge) to show that they develop antibodies and other signs of an immune response and that there are no obvious safety signals.

This is not a process unique to COVID vaccines. In fact, it is how seasonal flu vaccines are routinely formulated each year. That process is explained in detail here.

There’s more:

  • Simón accuses me of being “unaware of the fact that many individuals who have submitted to being injected with the mRNA concoction along with boosters – two, three, four times – have contracted the COVID virus anyway.” Well, he seems to be unaware that no vaccine is 100% effective – flu vaccines, for example, are typically about 40%-60% effective – so that so-called breakthrough infections are expected in some percentage of vaccinees. Moreover, he fails to understand that when an extremely large fraction of the population has been vaccinated, a significant number of new infections will be breakthrough infections in vaccinees. But even in those cases, the infections are less likely to result in hospitalization or death than infections in the unvaccinated.
  • Simón’s supporting sources (as evidenced by the links in his article) are notoriously unreliable and unscientific. They include The Epoch Times and Children’s Health Defense, Robert F. Kennedy’s aggressively anti-vaccine (and completely loony) organization.
  • Simón accuses the CDC of promoting “face masks to prevent contagion even though it is well known they have no effect in prevention. Mask mandates were simply a symbol of conformity, of obedience.” Complete rubbish, which is debunked here, with reliable references to experimental and real-world data.

I could go on, but I think I’ve made the point. Simón doesn’t know what he doesn’t know and is part of the fringe anti-vaccine, anti-mask, COVID-minimizing echo chamber. As a psychologist, it’s a pity that he doesn’t recognize that he’s suffering from delusions.

Henry I. Miller, a physician and molecular biologist, is the Glenn Swogger distinguished fellow at the American Council on Science and Health.  He was the founding director of the FDA’s Office of Biotechnology and is the co-discoverer of a critical enzyme in the influenza virus.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.



  • He offers no evidence just conjecture on safety and effectiveness.
    He has skin in the game and therefore should exclude himself from the discussion.
    If there are as he claims all this study data why does it take court orders for it to be released.
    He is the proverbial fox guarding the hen house.
    Regardless of his vaunted credentials, they in no wise speak to hi credibly.
    Many “highly” credentialed “experts” have be wrong and practice duplicitous to protect themselves.
    Early treatment of OTC medications in combination with well known off label use drugs have been proven to be far more safe and effective.
    What independent RTC’s were conducted on Remdesivir?
    This “Doctor and Researcher” is part of the problem with so called medical science.

    • Indeed. I see Wikipedia says

      “In 2017 it was reported that an article published (in 2015) on the Forbes website by Miller, under his own name, had been drafted by Monsanto.[8] As reported by the New York Times, Monsanto asked Miller to write an article rebutting the findings of the International Agency for Research on Cancer that had classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans. He had indicated willingness “if I could start from a high-quality draft.” On discovering this, Forbes removed his blog from and ended their relationship with him.”

      So even Forbes has some sense then.

  • Put your mask on, keep your distance at your cocktail parties, get your fifteenth booster and then come back and explain why you got covid for the third time. Covid is no longer a pandemic – it’s a cult religion to those who can’t let go.

  • I knew this would be a Henry I. Miller contribution even before I read the byline. It’s HIM again.

  • It’s a good thing the CDC hasn’t flushed every last bit of its credibility right down the toilet over the last three years.

  • I see that Dr. Miller is persisting with the prevailing strategy of “truth by assertion” and “science by consensus”. That scheme obviously works on the mindless masses, but that really isn’t saying much if you’re using it as evidence of being credible.

    I suspect this COVID debacle will go down in history as the greatest act of hoodwinking ever perpetuated against the public.

    For those with eyes to see and ears to hear, the truth about every facet of this pandemic is out, and it has been for some time now.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!