Issues & Insights
several apples beside bread pack and brown paper bag
Photo by Lisa Fotios on

Paper Or Plastic? The Fanatics Tell Us We Can’t Have Either

The Biden administration and the Democratic regime that rules California and other states are so busy banning things that it’s hard to keep up with what’s allowed, what isn’t and what won’t be tomorrow or next year. Much of the black list is made up of high-profile targets, such as gasoline-powered automobiles, diesel engines, gas stoves and plastic straws. But the prohibitionists work in small ways too, and it all adds up.

Scolds and eco-temperance harpies never rest, their eyes always on the lookout for another modern convenience to outlaw. Having successfully interdicted single-use plastic bags in at least eight states, they’re now aiming for their only reasonable replacements: paper bags.

Paper can’t be a solution to plastic waste,” says the headline of a recent story posted on Canada’s CTV News site. New Jersey enacted a paper bag ban last year, the first in the country, because, well, that’s just what blue states and cities do now: satisfy the deranged urges of petty tyrants.

The CTV story is as agenda-driven as any NPR article in the U.S. Various “experts,” “researchers” and activists screech and nag about “deforestation and forest degradation,” “increased pressure on the world’s forests” (caused by the plastic bag bans they have demanded), and “a really critical moment” in which “we need to take steps to keep forests standing.” One insisted that consumers have to “rethink and reorient themselves towards a reusable mind frame.”

One activist quoted in the report runs an Australian nonprofit that “works to protect the world’s forests by helping” retailers “ensure their packaging doesn’t rely on paper and is environmentally friendly.” According to her estimates, more than 3 billion trees, “many of which are old-growth and endangered,” are cut down “every year to make paper-based products like bags, straws and food containers.”

Leaving aside the definitions of “old-growth” and “endangered,” which can vary and are entirely subjective, let’s take a look at the logic, or lack thereof, in this statement. Does this activist and the many like her think that the industry will saw through entire forests with no thought to the future? That one day they’ll say, “well, we’ve cut down all the trees, what do we do now?”

Probably not. But she wants the consumers of her diatribes to believe it.

The truth is that the paper industry plants trees to replace the ones they harvest. In fact, “forests in North America grow significantly more wood than is harvested,” says Two Sides North America. Yes, it’s a nonprofit that represents companies that “span the graphic communications and paper-based packaging value chain.”

But what organization would have better data on logging and planting than one whose members are companies that … log and plant?

Furthermore, the trees used to replace the harvested wood grow fast.

“In North America, it takes less than two seconds to grow the fiber needed for a standard #10 envelope (on 100 acres of managed forests),” according to Two Sides.

The paper prohibitionists also don’t want the public to know that:

  • According to a research paper in the science journal Nature, global “tree cover has grown by 2.24 million square kilometers — the size of Texas and Alaska combined — in the last 35 years.”
  • “The U.S. has more trees now than it did 100 years ago.”
  • Tree planting has never been so popular as it is today.
  • There are more than 3 trillion trees on Earth, not 400 billion. That’s “seven times more than scientists previously thought,” CBS reported in 2015.

Today’s prohibitionists are a mix of eco-zealots, authoritarians, degrowth militants, Marxists, Karens, cranks, prigs, malcontents, virtue signalers and Gaia worshippers. They demand our obedience and take great pleasure in forcing us to conform to their whims. In their twisted minds, it’s their world and the rest of us are just a nuisance for living in it.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.


I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.


Rules for Comments: Getting comments posted on this site is a privilege, not a right. We review every one before posting. Comments must adhere to these simple rules: Keep them civil and on topic. And please do not use ALL CAPS to emphasize words. Obvious attempts to troll us won’t get posted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • My guess is these would be the same nannies who insist on all the unopenable food packaging, to protect our health and security.

  • You should factor in the amount of Southeastern U.S. forests that are being harvested and chipped to supply the wood burning Drax generator in the U.K. which was previously coal-fired. The burning of wood is legally defined as “renewable” even when you consider the hydrocarbons that are burned in the chain saws, handling equipment, land and sea shipping and the chipping process. Utter insanity in the name of the religion of Climate Change™.

  • The nags you mention probably do not know that there is an almost continuous forest on the East Coast from Florida to Maine now which had been logged off the last century. I live in an area that had been treeless farmland for miles 100 years ago and now has houses where every owner and municipality has planted many trees.

    And yes, all the big tree companies replant thousands of acres to stay in business.

    There is something very disappointing about the consistent naivety and ignorance, on every subject, even after we spend a national fortune on public education, that the zealous nags think is the truth!

  • I reuse my plastic bags for pet waste unless they have a hole in them. Some ladies in our locale crochet the plastic bags into blankets for the homeless. It is a mistake to think they are just put in landfills.

  • We tell the Fanatics. You can’t have your lives anymore. For he crimes of being useless and destructive to Society. Suicide now, save us the rope we’ll hang you with.

  • Such hipocrits! They are for cutting acres and acres of trees to make room for solar panels, yet don’t want us using paper bags because of the “trees”. Solar panels will last maybe ten years and then they have to be gotten rid of, but were? They are poisenous to our earth, yet here we are!

  • Idiot Americans not their heads and jump to follow every fiat of the Left. It’s sad. What happened to American grit?

  • These are the same Eco-Freaks who travel the globe in Private Jets and Yachts while telling us to stay at home Robert Redford who opposes Fossil Fuels while doing ads for United Airlines ITS TIME TO FLY and Gore the Bore with his fleet of Jets and John Travolta’s 707

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
%d bloggers like this: