Issues & Insights
Vintage newsroom photo. By PxHere, CC0 Public Domain (

Newsrooms Are Now Officially Democrats’ Newsletter Operations

The media’s leftward bias has been obvious for decades even as “journalists” denied their alignment with the Democratic Party. No honest person took Chris Cillizza’s 2016 claim that “reporters don’t root for a side. Period” to be true. All we’ve ever asked for is an admission from the media that it worked for the Democrats. We’re a little closer to that today.

Tuesday’s headline in the Daily Caller brought the light: “Major News Outlets Say They’re Ditching Objectivity In The Name Of ‘Diversity.’” The story beneath the headline tells us that, after interviewing more than 75 ​​”media leaders to gauge how the industry views the concept of ‘objectivity,’” a couple of big names in the press offered some guidelines for their colleagues.

The pair argued, said the Daily Caller, “that journalists should include their own beliefs, biases, and experiences to convey truth, and that journalistic objectivity was either unrealistic or undesirable.”

The two men who made the recommendation? Former Washington Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. and former CBS News President Andrew Heyward.

Not a year ago, the nabobs of the mainstream media tacitly admitted that their coverage is slanted when Gannett, the largest newspaper publisher in the country, announced it was “scaling back its opinion pages in an effort to combat a perception of” playing favorites and following a political agenda. The company claimed it had decided “readers don’t want us to tell them what to think.”

Of course the Gannett bosses didn’t say what they meant or mean what they said. As we wrote at that time, the press doesn’t need opinion pages when the “news” is so pointedly skewed that it is telling readers what to think.

The media’s constant protests of impartiality look more pathetic day by day – their pretense has been slipping for some time and they have often loudly undermined their shaky position. Think about the official unofficial policy at a number of media outlets regarding climate reporting and discussions. Their stated in-house rule is to ignore and “other” man-made global warming skeptics.

This was most evident three years ago when NBC’s “Meet The Press” moderator Chuck Todd said “we’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter. And human activity is a major cause, period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

Funny how that policy is at the same time unscientific, and a clear gift to the Democratic Party and its extreme elements (which covers just about everyone associated with that party).

All the denials built up over the decades that the media aren’t happy publicists for the Democrats can be punctured with one fact: Research by George Mason University economics professor Tim Groseclose found that media bias is worth 8 to 10 percentage points to the Democratic candidates in a typical election.

The last time we noted that fact, we also pointed out that it “means the last time a Democrat won a presidential election without the media’s help was maybe 1996, when Bill Clinton beat Bob Dole by 8.5 percentage points – before that, it was Lyndon Johnson’s 1964 win over Barry Goldwater by more than 20 points.”

The study, which Groseclose, then at UCLA, co-authored with Jeff Milyo, now at the University of Missouri, was completed two decades ago, when media bias was real but not as spectacular as it is today. We’d imagine that automatic 8- to 10-point head start today is closer to 12 to 14 points.

The media are so obviously operatives of the Democratic Party that it only stands to reason that the election benefit has since grown. Just look at the 2020 presidential outcome, which punished the country with a Joe Biden win. That victory was made not possible but probable by more than four years of the press lying about Donald Trump’s connection with the Russians. Yes, the media might be unhinged from reality, but they are tightly hinged to the Democratic Party.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.


I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.


  • Rush pointed out, decades ago, through soundbites of media folks parroting Democrat talking points, word-for-word, the point of this article. This is nothing new and Rush was the first to point it out. He is sorely missed during our downward spiral, but it is good he is not here to see the demise of the America and so loved.

  • Everyone knows that Media Matters feeds talking points to the Mockingbird Media every day.

    The Washington Post speaks for the CIA, IC and DNI. The New York Times and Politico speak for the FBI, DOJ-NSD and DHS concerns, while CNN is the representative voice of the U.S. State Dept. These are the constants in the ever-changing world of narrative engineering. Never forget them.

  • How many editors of the main media were reporters or editors of their college newspapers?
    The articles and opinions I read in the main media are just like those from college days written and edited by naive, sophomoric, cocksure, arrogant fellow students even before they had earned a BA or a BS degree.
    Someone recently asked how to solve much of the divisiveness in the country?
    Replace all the editors!

  • I have attempted for 2 days in a row to subscribe with my email, to no avail. Please fix this so I can subscribe. I finally found out (from Mark Levin) you guys were part of IBD… which I loved! Keep up the good work.

  • 1960s Cronkite/CBS showed their true godless communist colors by brainwashing useful idiots in America into losing the war we actually were winning, the Viet Cong later laughing/bragging about how bad they were being beaten until their CBS friends intervened. Yet even in 1930s-1940s WWII’s isolationism you can see the signs were most of the useful idiot, gullible world deemed Hitler to be wonderful and Churchill dangerous, as with those who hate Trump, none of whom I’ve seen giving a rational basis for the Trump Derangement Syndrome.
    as a devoted Christian it’s godlessness that’s ultimately significant versus “left” or “right” since I often oppose “conservaitvism” as much as “liberalism” (whatever those monikers even mean) when it pretends it possible to have a civilized land without Christ, something our vastly more educated and wiser Founders staunchly declared to be totally impossible, whose stern warning we ignore at our eternal peril, for only God can save us.

  • The “media” got the bit between their teeth with running Nixon out of DC. Now, that period looks positively benign compared to the “malignant journalism” of today.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
%d bloggers like this: