Issues & Insights
Anti-lockdown demonstration. Photo: GoToVan. Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en).

Voters Show Deep Political Split Over How Gov’t Handled COVID: I&I/TIPP Poll

America these days has many powerful political disagreements, even for things that, at least superficially, don’t seem to be overtly political. One of them is the government response to the COVID-19 virus outbreak. It has divided the country politically as few other issues in recent years, new I&I/TIPP data show.

Those responding to the latest poll were asked whether the economic lockdowns, public school closures, masking requirements and social restrictions were “necessary or unnecessary to address the COVID virus.”

The majority believe the government’s actions were needed. By 57% to 30%, Americans answered that the COVID restrictions, however draconian and painful, were “necessary” rather than “unnecessary.” Another 13% said they were not sure.

These results emerged from a national online I&I/TIPP Poll of 1,359 adults, taken from Nov. 2-4. The poll’s margin of error is +/-2.8 percentage points.

When you look at the breakdown by political affiliation, the COVID schism clearly comes into view.

Among Democrats, an overwhelming 79% said the COVID lockdown restrictions were necessary, versus just 35% of Republicans. Among independents, 50% said they were needed.

But just 12% of Democrats said they were “unnecessary,” compared to 52% of Republicans and 32% of independents. Only 9% of Democrats were unsure; 13% of Republicans and a sizeable 18% of independents weren’t certain.

So approval of the COVID restrictions appears to have been mostly a Democratic phenomenon.

The poll asked a second question of those who called the COVID restrictions “unnecessary,” roughly a third of all those queried. They were given six possible answers, but could select any or all that they felt would have been better than the policy government followed. The selections included:

  • 1. Warn the public about the risks of transmission, but leave the economy and schools open.
  • 2. Let the virus run its course and take common-sense precautions
  • 3. Do more research on potential vaccines, including mRNA shots, which had some bad after-effects for many young people.
  • 4. Fire those government officials found responsible and reform our government’s health care research facilities.
  • 5. Do nothing.
  • 6. Not sure.

Among those who called the government’s response “unnecessary,” the majority — 56% — chose the first answer, just ahead of 55% who picked No. 2 . Trailing, at a distant third at 41% was response No. 4, with No. 3 (the question on “more research” pulling up with just 30% of the answers.

“Do nothing” at 5% and “Not sure” at 4% came in last.

Of the 420 people who called the official COVID response “unnecessary,” 53% were Republican, while just 16% identified as Democrat. Independents made up 30%.

Among Democrats, none of the responses offered garnered more than 40%, including the first two. For both independents and Republicans, who have in general been more skeptical of the government’s COVID efforts, the first two answers were favored by more than 50%.

And only for response No. 3, “Do more research … ” was there common ground, with 26% of Democrats, 31% of Republicans and 29% of independents agreeing this was a good idea.

The point here is that, even among people who seemingly agree that the COVID lockdowns were “unnecessary,” significant political differences exist.

In our most-recent midterm elections, COVID-19 and how it was handled was the elephant in the room. As the I&I/TIPP Poll showed this month, a plurality (39%) of Americans believe granting amnesty to those who made COVID-policy mistakes was a bad idea, compared to 35% who thought amnesty was a good idea.

And again, the split was sharply partisan. A question arises: What effect, if any, did COVID have on the outcome of the recent election?

Both parties showed little enthusiasm for making COVID a major issue in the campaign, though it was clearly on the minds of many.

Democrats were tired of being criticized for their role in shutting down the economy, closing schools and mass-masking rules that infuriated many. In September, in an attempt to defuse the potentially explosive issue and with the midterms looming, President Joe Biden even told “60 Minutes”: “The pandemic is over.”

Biden’s comment was followed weeks later by a piece in the influential magazine The Atlantic proposing that those who made huge, in some cases deadly, mistakes should be granted amnesty for any of their crimes or misconduct.

Republicans and other conservatives themselves argued repeatedly this year that it was time to “move on” from COVID.

Was COVID thus defanged as an issue during the election?

Clearly, Republicans did not experience a “Red Wave” election, failing to win the Senate and barely eking out a win in the House. If Americans were so upset about COVID, why didn’t they vote out the party in power more decisively?

There are several reasons. One was an overwhelming desire by voters to “return to normal.” An early November poll by Pew Research found that COVID was 15th out of 18 national issues ranked by level of importance among Republicans. Among Democrats, it ranked 16th.

It’s certainly likely that some of the new Republican class in the House owe their victories at least in part to the disastrous national COVID response. Exit polls indicated that voters cared most about inflation, energy prices and the economy, followed by abortion (particularly among Democrats) and crime.

At the more local level, as Reason online recently noted, Red State governors that eased restrictions and kept their economies open, such as Florida’s Ron DeSantis and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, both cruised in their re-election bids:

“Across the country, Republican state executives who made a name for themselves by opposing business and school closures won reelection with far more comfortable margins than their first pre-pandemic runs.”

I&I/TIPP publishes timely, unique and informative data each month from our polls on this topic and others of public interest. TIPP has a reputation for polling excellence, one that comes from being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill O’Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTV’s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

4 comments

Rules for Comments: Getting comments posted on this site is a privilege, not a right. We review every one before posting. Comments must adhere to these simple rules: Keep them civil and on topic. And please do not use ALL CAPS to emphasize words. Obvious attempts to troll us won’t get posted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Freedom-loving Red state residents voted for their governors who kept their states open. Totalitarian Blue state residents voted for their governors who shut down small businesses, closed schools and put COVID-infected patients into nursing homes (causing half the pandemic deaths). That is the state of the USA today: Those who support authoritarian state governments, cancel culture and weaponizing attorney generals and big tech to censor and shutdown opposition, versus those who value free speech and freedom in general.

    So far, the Blue state neo-Bolsheviks have been more successful. Hence, the tyranny of the FBI/DOJ reigns supreme, and January 6 MAGA rot without trial going on 2 years in the Washington DC gulag prison while a former president and current presidential candidate faces endless persecution for documents stored behind double-locked doors monitored by cameras and guarded by the USA Treasury Dept’s elite Secret Service. The USA has become a corrupt Third World country. Hard to accept, I know. But facts are facts. The USA as it exists today under the Blue state communists is not worth defending, which is why the military can no longer recruit enough volunteers.

  • The question regarding the necessity of governmental pandemic response actions needs an additional breakdown, “Were the pandemic response actions politically necessary or necessary for public health?”
    There is definitely a large subset of voters who will freely admit that they favored these actions for political reasons. a significant number of the remaining who favored the pandemic response did so for political reasons, but they won’t admit it, either to themselves or to others or both.

  • Anyone who is unfamiliar with the blatant statements of intent which Democrat leaders have issued regarding COVID-19 must have (willfully) lived under a rock to not know about this. The COVID issue has been and still is being used as ‘an opportunity too good to miss’ by the Left (aka Democratic Party) as well as some major pharmaceutical companies. Democrat leaders have not even tried to be subtle about their opinion regarding the use of COVID as a political tool. On March 22, 2020 “Democrat House Majority Whip Rep. Jim Clyburn said that the Coronavirus Relief Bill is “a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision,”. Then on April 2, 2020 California Governor Newsom: “Yes, We Will Use Coronavirus to ‘Reimagine a Progressive Era’ There is opportunity for reimagining a progressive era as it pertains to capitalism … absolutely we see this as an opportunity to reshape the way we do business and how we govern.”
    Now substitute ‘Climate Change’ for ‘Coronavirus’ in the statements above and you can begin to see the pattern of lies Democrats casually indulge in for political power. If the news media, which ignores or improperly refutes the Democrat’s assertions, simply provided fact based reporting then the Democrat’s would be a regional party at best after a few election cycles. Actions have consequences unless the actions are taken by Democrats.

  • The Republican Party was “the party in power” on March 15, 2020 when suspension of normal government was declared by decree of a Republican President. The decree had no end date and is still in effect. On 3/22/2020, UK computer modeler Neil Ferguson published on his twitter (still posted) that the scary Covid computer model everyone including the US was relying on was actually something he’d written 13 yrs. earlier for a different disease, influenza. On March 29, 2020, Trump signed off on transfer of $2 trillion tax dollars for “virus” relief.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
Share
%d bloggers like this: