Issues & Insights

Justice Delayed Is Justice Debauched

On Sept. 6, 1901, President William McKinley was shot point-blank in a public receiving line by anarchist Leon Czolgosz. McKinley did not initially appear seriously wounded but succumbed to gangrenous organs Sept. 14.

Czolgosz was put on trial Sept. 23 and convicted and sentenced Sept. 26. He died in the electric chair barely a month later.

Contrast that outcome with a phenomenon dominating headlines anew in this correspondent’s home Sunshine State: The sentencing trial for an admittedly troubled Nikolas Cruz, who on Valentine’s Day 2018 entered his Parkland, Florida, high school, systematically executed 17 classmates and staff with a semi-automatic rifle, and wounded 17 others, three critically.

A trial on 17 counts of first-degree murder and 17 more of attempted murder was to begin some two years later in January 2020, but was delayed until summer because Cruz’s lawyers said 23 months was “far too fast for them to adequately prepare a defense” in an open-and-shut case, per a local station. Perhaps because the prosecution found it necessary to identify “at least 1,000 witnesses” and compile “about 4 million pages of evidence, photos, videos, and social media posts, and much more” – even though Cruz had confessed, on video, to the murders.

COVID delayed the trial further until ultimately, in October 2021, three-and-one-half years after the shootings, Cruz pled guilty to all counts. Eight months later, a jury was seated for the sentencing trial. And still this week, 54 months after the bloodbath, the defense is calling expert and other witnesses on Cruz’s difficult upbringing, mental capacity and potential emotional illness, though he fell outside the legal definition of insanity.

Does anyone doubt that if all 12 jurors somehow manage to agree on a death sentence for at least one count, years of appeals will ensue? After all, legal maneuverings persist for convicted Boston Marathon terrorist bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev close to a decade after he and his brother murdered three and injured 280 others, even after the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated his death sentence.

Meanwhile, other recent heinous killings fill broadcast air: The abduction and slaying of kindergarten teacher Elizabeth Fletcher in Memphis. The follow-on “livestream massacre” of four, also in the Bluff City. The bizarre Las Vegas stabbing of investigative journalist Jeff German by a corrupt county administrator.

All sharing something in common with the McKinley, Parkland and Boston homicides: seemingly damning evidence.  DNA – sufficient in Fletcher’s assault to connect the perp to a prior-year kidnapping and rape. Vehicles. And video, including shootings recorded on social media.

Outrage has followed revelations that the two Memphis suspects were free despite prior convictions. But the concern here is more about what lies ahead: Despite mountains of evidence likely piled upon already compelling forensics, the public will certainly be subjected to, frustrated with, and exhausted by years of process before justice is served.

The American Civil Liberties Union lays out the arguments that render society so skittish about seeking speedy and sure retribution: “Capital punishment is an intolerable denial of civil liberties,” “uncivilized in theory and unfair and inequitable in practice,” and a “barbaric and brutal institution” that “has no public safety benefit” as it “does not deter violent crime.”

Oh yeah? Ya know what’s “an intolerable denial of civil liberties?” Snuffing out innocent life, the premier “unalienable right” the Founders declared to have been “endowed by (our) Creator.”

Ya know what’s “uncivilized,” “barbaric” and “brutal?” Blowing out the brains of defenseless teenaged classmates with a high-powered rifle. Detonating pressure cookers packed with nails, BBs and metal shards that reportedly ripped into spectators, “tearing off victims’ limbs and spattering streets with blood.”

Ambushing a loving teacher and mother out jogging, subjecting her to a yet unrevealed but certainly savage demise, callously discarding her apparently unclothed body exposed in tall grass, then refusing to tell police where she lay. Cruising around bragging profanely, in racist language, on livestream, about a killing spree and then graphically recording the slaughter. Bushwhacking and viciously stabbing, multiple times, a courageous journalist who exposed a betrayal of the public’s trust and then clumsily attempting to hide a goofy disguise.

And ya think non-enforcement of the death penalty might explain why it “does not deter violent crime?” Given that some 320,000 murders or non-negligent homicides occurred between 2000 and 2019 but only 942 executions (less than 0.3%)? That the murder toll exceeded 24,000 in 2020, while death sentences dropped to just 18? That there are 2,414 prisoners currently on death row, but just 22 executions so far this year (under 1%)? And that appeals in one slam-dunk murder case have lasted longer than the lifespan of an 8-year-old victim, and a sentencing trial twice the stretch from Leon Czolgosz’s arraignment to his execution?

To restore a sane civil order in the face of murder madness, to protect the right to innocent life and the pursuit of happiness, and most of all to promote virtue over violence and cruelty, America must find its way to fixing its broken justice system. Society must restore the presumption that justice, while blind and aboveboard, is once again swift, certain and where appropriate, severe.

Bob Maistros is a messaging and communications strategist, crisis specialist and former political speechwriter. He can be reached at

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.



  • There’s no doubt that we must be careful when imposing the death penalty. I see no cogent argument for it in any case that is primarily circumstantial. However, in clear cut cases such as those described in the article, there is also no doubt that it is warranted and will permanently deter at least one person once it is carried out. It need not do anything more than that.

    • Thanks for reading, and I agree with all your points. In the Bible, two witnesses were required. In these cases, DNA and video are essentially witnesses. It’s hard to go anywhere these days without being on camera somewhere. And DNA is even stronger than a fingerprint.

      Studies also show there is a deterrent effect if potential criminals actually think the death penalty will be carried out. If it only is in <1% of cases, it's essentially useless.

  • also read the recent global campaign by Pope Frances who wants the Death Penalty voided for all crimes citing the 10 Commandments’ Thou Shall Not Kill as his justification. Such a political position is immoral because it denies justice for the victims of criminal acts. And abolishing the Death Penalty contradicts the Church’s long-standing teaching that killing in self-defense (saving one’s own life) is correct.
    My understanding is that some in the Church are Absolutists who only comprehend morality in black and white judgments. Aurelius Augustus in 418 wrote Church dogma explaining everything as evil (black) or good (white). That myopic viewpoint still exists in the 3rd millennium which ignores the diversity found in reality, aka, life.
    Adam of CA.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
%d bloggers like this: