Issues & Insights

Student Debt ‘Forgiveness’: Biden’s Illegal, Inflationary, Inequitable Attempt To Buy Votes

President Joe Biden’s plan for student debt “forgiveness” is nothing of the sort. It merely takes money from one group of taxpayers and gives it to another. It will not increase access to education, or improve it at all. And it will drive up inflation. In short, it’s yet another leftist sham intended to cull votes from the unthinking herd.

After leaking that the debt forgiveness scheme would amount to about $10,000 per eligible student, the White House — surprise! — made it $20,000 instead, doubling the damage that will ensue.

Under the program, Pell Grant recipients will be eligible for that $20,000 in relief, versus $10,000 for all others. And it goes only to those earning less than $125,000. It also extends the current loan repayment “pause” though the end of this year, while capping the amount a student has to repay at 5% of income.

There are so many problems with this idea it’s hard to know where to start.

How about this: The president doesn’t have the right under the Constitution to “forgive” anyone’s debts. It’s not in his list of superpowers. But that’s just some crazy right-wing idea, you say?

Even House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, no shrinking violet when it comes to leftist lunacy, understands this:

“Here’s the thing,” Pelosi said in June 2021. “People think that the president of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress. And I don’t even like to call it forgiveness because that implies a transgression. It’s not to be forgiven, just freeing people from those obligations.”

And, dang, she’s right. Except as she “frees” some “people from those obligations,” she’ll force others to pay them. That’s called a tax.

But the move is bad on so many other levels.

To begin with, it sets a precedent. Forgive student debts? Why not credit card debts? Household mortgages? Heck, let’s have that national debt jubilee the democratic socialists always talk about, and just stop paying on the $30 trillion and change we owe around the world. Why not?

The fact is, an elemental part of our economy is debt. Debt is a pledge to repay what you owe. It is a responsibility. It’s why people can buy cars and homes. Biden dents this system of trust with his decision to favor one group of debtors over all others and allowing them to abrogate their responsibility to repay their debts.

Then there’s the sheer cost: $311 billion, or roughly three times the annual budget for the Department of Education. Biden has already cancelled $32 billion in debt for some 1.6 million people. Now he’s increasing that cost 10-fold, at a time when the current deficit is expected to exceed $1 trillion for the third year in a row.

But, surely, at least this will lower the costs of going to school for the poor and the working class, right? It’s all about equality, isn’t it?

Sorry, but as Brad Palumbo of Based-Politics.com reminds us, “An analysis by the Wharton School of Business found that Biden’s plan would still give up to 73% of the benefits to the top 60% of earners — aka, 73% would not go to the bottom 40%, who are the poor/working class.”

So that’s another major lie at the heart of student loan forgiveness.

That bottom 40%, by the way, will also feel the sting of the $20 billion in new taxes and surge in IRS audits under Biden’s fraudulent Inflation Reduction Act.

So what about minorities? Won’t student debt relief be a boon to minority students and their parents. Quite the contrary.

“The issue is debt cancellation might reduce the racial wealth gap between two rich doctors, a rich black doctor and rich white doctor, but it actually widens the racial wealth gap overall, because disproportionately the people who hold student debt that went to college are white, and the 87% of Americans that didn’t go to college are disproportionately people of color,” Marc Goldwein, a Johns Hopkins University economist, told CNN.

This headline says it all in just a few words: Majority of White House Staffers Eligible for Biden’s Student-Loan ‘Forgiveness.’

What’s worse, it will contribute to inflation, just as the comically misnamed Inflation Reduction Act will.

Ask President Barack Obama’s top economic adviser, Larry Summers, who in a series of recent tweets crushed the idea of student loan forgiveness.

“Student loan debt relief is spending that raises demand and increases inflation,” Summers wrote. “It consumes resources that could be better used helping those who did not, for whatever reason, have the chance to attend college. It will also tend to be inflationary by raising tuitions.”

Americans are wary of the inflationary impact, too. A CNBC poll found 59% of Americans, who already face $6,000 a year in an annual Bidenflation tax, worry that student debt forgiveness will make it worse.

And it will. Jason Furman, another top Obama administration economic adviser, now at Harvard, had this to say:

“Most importantly, everyone else will pay for this either in the form of higher inflation or in higher taxes or lower benefits in the future … given the new announcement you need to double everything in it,” he tweeted.

Furman noted: “There are a number of other highly problematic impacts including encouraging higher tuition in the future, encouraging more borrowing, creating expectations of future debt forgiveness, and more.”

It’s a terrible move by Biden, supported by the extreme-leftist Democrats who now control Congress. So why do it? Their real aim is to win seats for Democrats from gullible voters in the midterm elections, now just three months away. It’s a shameful display of fiscal irresponsibility and faux-egalitarianism, and yet another big reason why voters should throw the bums out.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

5 comments

  • Does not matter if it is another Big Lie, illegal and never actually happens. As long as it works, serves its purpose. The idea is to energize, get out the vote and shake loose donation money from the higher-income, “woke” white liberals who stand to benefit most from loan forgiveness. Who can resist free money? No accident here. Targeted Midterm Election propaganda carefully crafted by White House script writers. Pure PT Barnum, like in the run-up to Obamacare (save money, keep your doctor, etc.). If it makes the party base happy, as did Russia, Russia, Russia, Impeachments 1 & 2, January 6, etc., then it will be a success even if it never happens. No doubt, the would-be beneficiaries will wallow happily like pigs in a mud bath. Mission accomplished.

    I remember opening up House Speaker Tip O’Neill’s biography, where in the opening paragraphs, much to the amazement of the biographer, O’Neill told a Big Lie about congressional legislation to a room full of Boston liberals who were happy to hear the lies because it made them feel good (the truth did not matter). All in a day’s work for Tip. This is the Democrat party playbook that has worked successfully for over a century. Joe Biden has been doing it all his adult political life, with occasional mental gaffes when the truth is uttered.

  • Congress must act immediately against the President’s illegal use of Executive Orders. This move is undoubtedly unconstitutional and can not be allowed to stand. If college loan forgiveness was the right thing to do, and it isn’t, America’s Universities have the financial where-with-all to do so without government help. These institutions were sitting on endowments whose total value at the end of 2020 was estimated to be six-hundred ninety-one billion dollars.

    Student loan forgiveness is so wrong on so many levels it is laughable. First, it is morally wrong. The idea that other citizen, the old, people who chose work that didn’t require a college education, those who went to college yet either worked their way through school or paid their loans off, and anyone with any debt for any reason should countenance their government playing off another citizen’s contractual obligation to repay their debt. There simply is no justification for any citizen to pay off the voluntary debt for another citizen simply because that person chooses not to honor his/her contractual obligations.

    There are other reasons not to do this, things like the inflationary, the fact that the President’s action exceeds his authority, and the additional growth in government and further diminish our agency, but the immorality of the act itself is sufficient reason not to allow this to happen.

    If you believe as I do, let your Representative and your Senators know how you feel and make the political cost of voting for this higher than the cost to kill it.

  • Stolen elections have terrible consequences. Get rid of the election fraud machines and hand count the votes of eligible US citizens. We the People need to show up if we want to keep our Republic. Joe Biden is not a legitimate US President!

  • Heads the Democrats win, tails the Democrats win.
    It’s likely that this debt forgiveness will not stand in court because it’s clearly unconstitutional. Do the Democrats lose? No, because they will claim that a conservative court took away your goodies. If you want a progressive court, vote Democrat.

    By the way, if I did my math correctly, the $311B amounts to about $950 for every man, woman and child in the U.S., not taxpayer, but each person! Assuming that this move really happens, it means a family of four has a new tax liability on their heads of about $3800.00.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
Share
%d bloggers like this: