Issues & Insights
Image: Brian J. Matis, licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

Will The New Gun Control Bill Do What The Public Wants? — I&I/TIPP Poll

President Joe Biden signed a sweeping gun control bill into law over the weekend that aims to prevent future massacres like the one that occurred in Uvalde, Texas, a month ago. The new law enhances background checks for young would-be gun buyers, encourages states to pass so-called “red flag” laws, and devotes some money to improving school security.

The May 24 attack on a Uvalde elementary school that killed 19 students and two teachers created a wave of anger across America over gun violence in schools. Parents wondered not just about how a young deranged man could carry out such a horrendous crime, but also about the failures of local school officials and the local police to better protect students.

The June I&I/TIPP Poll, taken online from June 8-10, asked a random sample of 1,310 adults the following question: “How effective will the following actions be in making U.S. schools safer?”

Those responding were given six possible responses.

Two of the possible responses tied for No. 1 in terms of effectiveness: “Increasing school security (uniformed police officers, private armed security, etc.)”, and “Increasing background checks for gun buyers,” both at 81%.

A close second was the response “screening of gun buyers for mental illness,” with 80%.

Further down the list, but still above 50%, came “Raising the minimum age for purchasing a firearm,” 71%; “Banning semi-automatic rifles,” 65%; and the least favorite, “Providing weapons and weapons training for teachers,” 58%.

But even broad agreement can mask specific differences, especially with such a politically charged issue as guns and gun control.

For instance, “banning semi-automatic rifles” is the most politically polarizing of all the responses. While 86% of Democrats called this effective, just 42% of Republicans did, and 61% of independents.

While they get the most media coverage, “semi-automatic” rifles, even if banned, would likely have little impact on overall gun deaths. As a report from Pew Research earlier this year found:

In 2020, handguns were involved in 59% of the 13,620 U.S. gun murders and non-negligent manslaughters for which data is available, according to the FBI. Rifles – the category that includes guns sometimes referred to as ‘assault weapons’ – were involved in 3% of firearm murders. Shotguns were involved in 1%.

So regulating semi-automatic rifles is unlikely to have a major impact.

Giving weapons and training to teachers was another issue where significant political differences arose. While 72% of Republicans favored this move, only 52% of Democrats and 55% of independents agreed.

It should be noted that 10 states already allow teachers to be armed at school. Ohio became the most recent just this month. As of today, none of those states has had a school shooting.

Least polarizing suggestion? Better and more security at schools. That was the only answer in which both major political parties and the independents were all within 10 percentage points of one another in their responses.

And, despite the media playing up differences among Americans, whites and blacks and Hispanics were very close in how they answered the poll questions. Indeed, the average difference between whites and blacks/Hispanics for all questions asked was just over 3 percentage points — barely outside the poll’s +/-2.8 percentage-point margin of error.

So on these issues, Americans aren’t divided. They’re united, regardless of race.

Indeed, even the male-female split was larger than the one between races. On average, male-female answers differed by just over 5 percentage points.

What’s clear is that Americans believe that not enough is being done to prevent such attacks from happening. While it’s true that armed attacks on schools such as the one in Uvalde are actually not as common as they seem, that doesn’t lessen the fears of parents or assuage the grief of those who lost children in a school attack.

One oft-repeated criticism of policy proposals is that they mostly target weapons, not the actual people that use them to commit heinous crimes.

To that end, the I&I/TIPP survey showed that policies such as increased background checks and screening gun-buyers for mental illness — which both focus on keeping mentally unstable people from committing such crimes — garner broad support.

In virtually every recent case of someone shooting up a school, there were ample signs that the person or persons who did it were a danger to the community. But no one intervened. Or the signs were ignored.

Research from The Violence Project, a nonprofit research group, has found that the average age of those engaged in school attacks is about 18, with 56% having been bullied in the past, and 62% showing indications of mental illness.

In response, some have proposed enacting “red flag laws,” or “Extreme Risk Protection Orders,” which let judges take away a person’s guns without a trial, based only on a written complaint that the person is a danger to him- or herself, or to others.

The truth is, all 50 states and the federal government already have laws on the books that let people who are a threat be committed and have their guns taken from them. And red flag laws bypass due process, ignoring that there are already laws to disarm those who are deranged or merely dangerous.

The question is, in a time when many district attorneys are letting hardened felons and mentally ill criminals back on the streets, whether even red flag laws would be enough. Laws that aren’t enforced aren’t really laws at all.

Each month, I&I/TIPP publishes timely and informative data from our polls on this topic and others of interest. TIPP’s reputation for excellence has come from being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill O’Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTV’s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

6 comments

  • This legislation was never intended to prevent school shootings. It’s intended to provide a slippery slope to confiscate guns from EVERYBODY. The so-called “red flag” incentive will have every Leftist neighbor, teacher, doctor, ex-spouse, you name it–turning in names of every law-abiding citizen who has a gun, and declare them ALL unfit to own or carry a firearm. Local law enforcement will rubber-stamp their complaint and seize their guns, because lawyers will tell them to err on the side of caution for legal liability: If any gun event happens–even if clearly a self-defense shooting–and a Leftist or ex-spouse had complained about the shooter, that opens the door for lawsuits against the LEOs for NOT confiscating that citizen’s guns.

  • Whatever our government tries to do about gun control will never ever accomplish what they intended it to do, because the morons passing those bills in congress have forgotten what human rights actually mean, or the fact that criminals don’t give a royal shit about laws.

    The state gains its power from we the people, but apparently those in government have forgotten that aspect of their jobs. They have also forgotten why we have a Second Amendment about our right to own self-defense tools, Namely guns. The reason it became second is that it is the one defending and supporting the First Amendment, which allows humanity to converse about issues we believe are important.

    Only tyrannical despots want to take your guns, which leaves you defenseless against their tyranny. This has been proven over and over again all across the planet in just about every age, with despots being deposed just as brutally as they had treated their subjects.

  • Smatter? You don’t like capitalizing the alphabet. Or are you frightened by yelling, when we’re so angry we’re ready to take on tyranny with guns? Stop acting like sniveling Beta Males who are afraid of their own shadows.

  • The problem with polls are the pollsters. Questions like “Increasing background checks for gun buyers” are meaningless for the majority since few would be able to tell you what the current status of background checks are. Nobody with any knowledge of guns would be believe banning semi-auto 22 caliber rifles would save lives. These types of questions encourage the responder to answer with the feel good response rather than a reasoned response and make for useless polls. Democrats in general are far more responsive to feel good issues than thinking issues and you could have come up with really similar numbers if you had just used your parallel information about party affiliation.

  • No only will it not accomplish the ostensible goal of reducing future school shootings, it’s NOT what the public wants. It’s merely another instance of the left not letting the “crises” go to waste in furthering their agenda.

  • Its all part of the plans by the Globalists the UN and CFR all part of the New World Order(NWO)and a One World Government under the United Nations and its bands of Robber Barons and Tyrants as why the United Nations was created for in the first place

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar image above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
Share
%d bloggers like this: