Issues & Insights
Alejandro Mayorkas, director of Homeland Security. Source: World Travel & Tourism Council. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en).

The Real Reason Why The Disinformation Governance Board Got Cancelled: I&I/TIPP Poll

Why did the Joe Biden administration abruptly shut down its Disinformation Governance Board a mere three weeks after creating it? The latest I&I/TIPP Poll has the answer.

As the administration’s plan for creating the Orwellian-sounding speech regulator was being rolled out, the I&I/TIPP Poll asked 1,320 Americans from May 4 to May 6 a simple question: “How much do you trust the Disinformation Governance Board to decide what is disinformation fairly and accurately?”

Among the 550 who said they were following the Disinformation Board “closely,” the reaction was strong: 55% said they had “little trust” (22%) or “no trust at all” (32%). That compares with 42% who said they had “a lot of trust” (19%) and “quite a bit of trust” (22%).

In short, it was a highly unpopular idea. Indeed, it was more unpopular than even the overall numbers suggest.

The only major political grouping that trusted the Disinformation board was the Democratic Party. They gave it a big thumbs up in the poll, with 73% giving it “a lot” or “quite a bit” of trust, versus just 23% granting the new agency “little” or “no” trust.

Among the rest of the American polity, the feelings were strongly the opposite.

Republicans overwhelmingly — 81% had “little or no trust,” versus 16% who said they trusted it “a lot” or “quite a bit” — rejected the new board.

Independents were only slightly less adamant, with 75% saying they didn’t trust the new disinformation board, versus 21% who said they did.

One other interesting result: Of the four major income groups regularly followed by I&I/TIPP, only among the wealthiest group (those earning $75,000 a year or more), did a majority say they trusted the new board: 59% to 39%.

The three other income groups, all below $75,000 in annual income, had an aggregate response of 62% “little or no trust,” vs. 34% with “a lot or quite a bit” of trust.

Similarly, while a majority (52%) of Blacks and Hispanics supported the board, 42% didn’t. That’s strongly at odds with the overall 73% to 23% of the Democratic Party as a whole.

Such stark differences show the potential for a bitter cultural battle within the Democratic Party, pitting wealthy leftist elites against the party’s working-class base on issues ranging from abortion and alternative lifestyles, to violent crime and woke education.

No doubt, both White House and congressional Democrat internal polling showed similar results. As such, the controversial and widely criticized (even by Democrats) Disinformation Governance Board became just one more unpopular issue that could dramatically alter the playing field for Democrats in the upcoming mid-term elections.

This is not just speculation.

A Gallup Poll of Republicans, Democrats and independents taken earlier this year already showed a dramatic shift in voter preference in just the past year.


See also: Warning: Biden Is Already Plotting To Restart His  ‘Disinformation Board’ 


Most stunning of all: As recently as the start of 2021, 49% of all voters said they were “Democrat or leaned Democrat,” while just 40% said they were “Republican or leaned Republican.”

By the start of this year, those numbers had nearly reversed themselves, with 47% now saying they leaned toward the GOP, versus 42% who said they leaned toward the Democrats.

This suggests that Democrats are losing the battle for independent voters, whose support they will need to win elections. And, as we noted above, those voters overwhelmingly disliked the new Disinformation Governance Board, considering it a potential intrusion on Americans’ First Amendment rights under the Constitution.

Most Americans, it seems, did not agree with Homeland Security chief Alejandro Mayorkas that so-called “disinformation” poses a “huge threat to our homeland,” but rather saw in the board’s creation a much bigger threat to Americans’ most cherished civil liberties.

Of concern to many was the sudden creation of the board roughly at the same time that billionaire Elon Musk announced his $42 billion takeover of Twitter.

As the Washington Examiner noted, “The unveiling of the disinformation panel struck some critics as an ominous government response to Musk’s stated goal of permitting more free speech on Twitter and fit more broadly into a narrative on the right that liberals seek to discredit any content they don’t like by characterizing it as dangerous.”

One major issue came from the person selected to head the new board, leftist activist and researcher Nina Jankowicz, who resigned her post as executive director after the controversial Disinformation Governance Board was “suspended” last week.

Jankowicz became a symbol of the new board and, as such, came in for a torrent of criticism from its opponents.

“She had a history of promoting multiple debunked theories, including that former President Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election and that Hunter Biden’s laptop was a Russian disinformation operation,” Fox News wrote.

Others found it hard to take her seriously after a year-old Tik Tok video of her singing about “information laundering” to the Mary Poppins tune “Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious” went viral.

“Information laundering is really quite ferocious. It’s when a huckster takes some lies and makes them sound precocious, by saying them in Congress or a mainstream outlet, so disinformation’s origins are slightly less atrocious,” she sang in the 2021 video.

Jankowicz responded to the criticisms, saying, “So I would point to those parts of my CV and my resume (that are relevant) and not these tweets and parts of my personal life that have been picked on in this childish game in order to endanger our national security. That’s what’s going on here.”

Even so, as the I&I/TIPP data clearly show, support for the controversial overseer of Americans’ speech was politically and demographically narrow, and likely to cost Democrats votes in the coming midterms. Because of the board’s lack of political support, it was doomed from the start.

Every month, I&I/TIPP publishes timely and informative data from our polls on this topic and others of interest. TIPP has earned a reputation for excellence by being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill O’Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTV’s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

4 comments

  • C’mon man. The big guy didn’t cancel the disinformation board. He has only hidden it from view. The swamp has been working in concert with the elite media, Hollywood, Silicon Valley and our school systems to control and spin information. – To wit: There is no man made climate change and 97% of scientists do not believe this is true. Homosexuality is not genetic, it is cultural. Biological sex is not cultural, it is genetic. The J6 march on Washington was not an insurrection, it was a protest march. The Covid pandemic response was not to protect our health, it was to give the government more power while keeping the public frightened, alone and confused.
    I could go on, but I think I’ve made my point.

  • It isn’t cancelled, just “paused”. It will be back in a stronger and more virulent form. Then “pause” is for 75 days while they try to figure out how to get it in place. It WILL happen.

    • they have just named michael chertoff and jamie gorelick to “lead a thorough review and assessment” about this project and it’s goals and impact on civil rights. this is like hiring a fox and a coyote to look into security procedures after the the henhouse murder scandal.
      chertoff, this is the man who literally co-authored the patriot act, the most horrendous, abused, and outright unconstitutional and un-amercian piece of legislation in living memory.

  • I wish to comment beng civil and on topic, and without using all caps.

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar image above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 




Share
%d bloggers like this: