Issues & Insights

How Is ‘Boofed’ Pronounced? And Other Vital Questions Ketanji Brown Jackson Must Answer

By all evidence, Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination to the Supreme Court will be a shoo-in. Not because she’s supremely qualified, but because her nomination — as the press reminds us in every headline — is “historic.” Yes, there are and have been black justices and women justices, but never, ever a black woman justice! Who would dare stand in the way of history?

President Joe Biden assumed that by checking all the correct woke boxes his candidate could escape the sort of vicious scrutiny, rumormongering, character-destroying attacks visited upon Republican nominees – apparently forgetting that Democratic nominees always get a free pass from the media, and from genteel Republicans.

Nevertheless, if Democrats want to at least give the appearance of fairness, they should ask Jackson the same questions they asked the last two Republican nominees to the court.

We’re not talking about those silly questions that might reveal her judicial philosophy. Although there is plenty there worthy of careful scrutiny. Joel Pollak over at Breitbart News put together a handy list of such questions, ranging from: Do you believe current penalties for sex offenders are too harsh? What do you think of Biden’s decision only to select a black woman as a nominee? Do you support critical race theory? Do you agree with the “1619 Project” that America was founded on slavery? Do you support court-packing? Can we have rule of law with an open border?

Democrats have already labeled such questions as racist. They also, no doubt, have jettisoned previous standards for Supreme Court nominees, including the ones put forth by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, such as that a nominee who can’t get 60 votes in the Senate shouldn’t be approved, nor can anyone “with a deep-seated ideology” because they wouldn’t have “a neutral legal mind.”

Forget about all that. We’re talking about the truly substantive questions Democrats pressed Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett with for answers. Questions that get to the heart of what it means to be a Supreme Court justice. Questions such as these (which are taken directly from previous Supreme Court nomination hearing transcripts):

  • Who or what is Lowenbrau? A classmate? A secret party place? Is it related to the ‘Devil’s Triangle,’ or a type of ‘boofing’?
  • I don’t know if it’s “boufed” or “boofed” — how do you pronounce that?
  • Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors, or committed any physical or verbal harassment or assault of a sexual nature?
  • Have you ever passed out from drinking?
  • What do you consider to be too many beers?
  • Was there ever a time when you drank so much that you couldn’t remember what happened, or part of what happened the night before?
  • Do you believe Anita Hill?
  • Do you agree that it is possible for men to both be friends with some women, and treat other women badly?
  • Do you believe that climate change is happening and is threatening the air we breathe and the water we drink?”

Then there’s the one question that Democrats didn’t ask, but wanted to:

“I would be afraid to ask her about the presence of gravity on Earth. She may decline to answer because it might come up in a case, you know, it could come before a court someday,” Sen. Dick Durban said during Barrett’s confirmation.

Until Democrats on the Judiciary Committee ask all these questions of the current nominee, including her view on the presence of gravity on Earth, how could they possibly countenance confirming Ketanji Brown Jackson to a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court?

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

8 comments

  • That any awkward question (one she cannot answer ) will be deemed “rayshist” is a given. She is a Democrat. If 30 % of her responses are candid, it will set a record. And ultimately, if being a black woman is the apogee of criteria for approving her as SCOTUS, that other ground breaking example of black womanhood ( is that not trans phobic ?) should be at the front of everyone’s mind. Do you really need another Kamala Harris , this time not as virtue signalling facade, but as a functioning member of the highest court in the land ?

  • The historic value here is that she would be the first SC justice to be put into the highest court of the land with a biased pre-approval announcement that her main qualification is the gender and her skin pigmentation.

  • I keep reading that her confirmation is a fait accompli. Will Manchin and Sinema vote to confirm her? What is the voting threshold? A simple majority?

    If she is actually confirmed, it is just another step towards the destruction of our republic.

    • A simple majority is all that is needed. Democrats tried to filibuster the Gorsuch nomination and Republicans killed the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.

  • I would like to come forward and tell the court that Ms. Ketanji Brown Jackson drugged me and then touched me in my “special place”. It’s not remotely true, but I would like to tell the court anyway. Fair is fair, right?

    • Not good enough. Tell them about the time she paid prostitutes to pee on a hotel bed if you really want to get some high-level action on her. It’s the important and credible stuff like that that sinks the hopes of followers.

  • Brown is another hate white people angry black. She should never serve on the Supreme Court or any other court. She was nominated by senile little girl fondling Joe Biden ONLY because she is black and a woman and she can’t even define the word “woman”. Wonder what she would think of old slow Joe is she saw this?

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1277705752463814656

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar image above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 




Share
%d bloggers like this: