Issues & Insights
Photo: James McNellis, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en).

I&I/TIPP Poll: As Court Decision Looms, Abortion Issue Still Sharply Divides Americans

Abortion has long been an incendiary issue within American politics. The latest I&I/TIPP Poll shows that hasn’t changed, with voting-age Americans sharply split on whether abortion should be limited by the law.

With a Supreme Court decision looming on Mississippi’s ban on abortions after 15 weeks, the I&I/TIPP Poll asked people the following question: “Should abortion be illegal after six weeks of pregnancy, except in the case of a medical emergency?”

On Sept. 1 of last year, Texas became the first state to lower its legal limit on abortions to 6 weeks or after a fetal heartbeat is found. That case now sits in the hands of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which sent the case to the Texas Supreme Court, which could add months to a final decision. 

If the law withstands legal challenges, it could be a model for other states wanting to limit abortions.

Of those responding to the I&I/TIPP Poll, fully 39% said they would make abortion illegal after six weeks, while 44% said they would oppose such a move. A significantly large 17% said they were unsure.

Respondents were then given a statement and asked for their response. “U.S. laws restricting abortion should be . . . ” They were then given four possible answers: “More strict,” “Less strict,” “Left as is,” and “Not sure.”

There, it’s a toss-up: 32% said they wanted more strict abortion laws and 32% said they wanted less strict laws. Some 23% said they wanted laws left as they are, and another 13% said they were not sure.

But political affiliation is where the differences really show.

Among those who self-identify as Republicans, a solid 55% say they would support a 6-week abortion limit, while 51% said they’d like stricter abortion laws. For Democrats, 33% said they would support the 6-week limit and just 22% said they wanted stricter laws.

On both issues, independents were far closer in their responses to the Democrats than to the Republicans: 34% support the 6-week limit, just 1% higher than the Dems, and 30% support stricter laws, vs. 22% for the Dems.

But here it’s important to note: While there are differences, at a minimum, one out of three Americans of all political parties would support the most strict limits on when an abortion can take place. And long-term, other surveys show, anywhere from 37% to 44% each year say that abortion should be illegal “in all or almost all” cases.

Another key point: African-Americans and Hispanic-Americans, America’s largest minority groups, differ on abortion. Among Hispanics, a plurality of 46% say abortions should be illegal after six weeks; among blacks, it’s 36%. On whether abortion laws need to be stricter, 38% of Hispanics say yes, compared to just 28% of Blacks.

With abortion on the Supreme Court’s docket and a decision likely this summer, the issue will loom large in the upcoming mid-term elections.

The court will soon decide whether Mississippi’s law limiting abortions after 15 weeks is valid under the Constitution and consistent with the court’s earlier rulings. If not, it could be overturned.

But if it is, then Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that set off decades of often-bitter debate, will likely be overturned or, at minimum, extensively modified.

As the I&I/TIPP data show, whatever way the high court decides will leave at least a third of the American public disappointed and set up a new debate not just for this election cycle, but for the coming decades.

Under Roe v. Wade, the court essentially ruled that abortion was legal under a presumed “right to privacy,” a right that is not actually found in the Constitution but rather inferred by the court from other existing rights. Even some staunch Roe supporters agree the legal reasoning by the 1973 court was flimsy at best, making Roe vulnerable.

Recently, the Guttmacher Institute and Pew Charitable Trusts estimated that at least 26 states stand ready to make abortion illegal if Roe is overturned.

Still, it stands as the law of the land.

Even back in 1973, the court knew it was stepping into a bitter dispute. At the time, it acknowledged “the sensitive and emotional nature of the abortion controversy, of the vigorous opposing views, even among physicians, and of the deep and seemingly absolute convictions that the subject inspires.”

That remains true today.

Under Roe, abortion was essentially left to a woman and her doctor for the first three months, or trimester; during the second trimester, a state can regulate abortion, but only with regards to protecting a woman’s health; for the final three months of pregnancy, states were given the right to ban or regulate the procedure, except when the woman’s health was in question.

The court, in rendering its decision, cited states’ “important and legitimate interest in potential life.” The U.S., according to the anti-abortion Charlotte Lozier Institute, is only one of seven countries worldwide to permit abortion after 20 weeks.

The general standard under Roe was confirmed by the 1992 Casey decision, which basically allowed abortion to be legal only before a fetus was “viable.” After that, it could be regulated or even made illegal. Initially, viability was set at 28 weeks; medical advances have lowered that to 23 weeks, still nearly 6 months into a pregnancy.

As The New York Times recently wrote, “Few countries allow abortion without restriction until fetal viability, the cutoff set by Roe v. Wade . . . Because of medical advances, that is now around 23 weeks. And only around a dozen other countries allow abortions for any reason beyond 15 weeks of pregnancy, the threshold in the Mississippi law the Supreme Court is considering, which could overturn Roe.”

So, if nothing else, the Roe and Casey decisions look likely to have their “viability” standards sharply reduced by the court, even if Roe isn’t overturned completely.

All the data come from the monthly I&I/TIPP Poll, which was conducted online from Feb. 2-4 and includes responses from 1,355 adults nationwide. The poll’s margin of error is +/- 2.8 percentage points.

To serve our readers, I&I/TIPP will continue to provide timely and informative data from our monthly polls on this topic and others of major interest. TIPP has earned a reputation for excellence by being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Terry Jones is editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill O’Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTV’s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

6 comments

  • “Abortion issue sharply divides Americans”. Yes, American politicians. The rest of us have been sick and tired of hearing about it decades ago but it keeps being shoved in our faces as if that were the most important thing in the world. Mose of us silently agree that this is a purely personal decision by pregnant women, that it’s a personal religious issue for those who are religious, and has zero to do with politics. Forcing people to have children is rank slavery, it’s no different than pumping bull semen into a cow that we own. A woman forced to bear children is nothing but property. You can’t escape this truth. This is not an argument or a political opinion. This is fact. Start with that.

    • That’s a monstrous attitude. Ultrasound has shown us babies experience fear in the womb. Twins, for example, clutch hands when frightened. With all the alternate birth control methods available nowadays–even including MAP–there’s no excuse for unleashing such horror, Bizarre–and typical of the creep Left–that it would object so strongly to ant-vaxers but smugly wear Tshirts emblazoned ‘My body, My Choice’ when referencing terror in the womb. The height of creep hypocrisy!

  • Abortion of a healthy fetus is destruction of life. Prenatal development is a continuum and abortion claimed to be legal by virtue of inviability outside the womb or absence of a detectable heartbeat or arbitrarily stipulated time from conception is still termination of life, something we penalize in other contexts. Third trimester abortion is, of course, akin to infanticide. Questions of rape, incest and severe fetal abnormalities should be different from the discussion Supreme Court justices and we, the American people, will have with respect to termination of the healthy unborn child. This discussion should not be easy, nor should it be reserved for judges alone.

  • I looked into this fairly recently, and determined that there are fourteen different ways to have sex without getting pregnant, which seems to be the objective. Perhaps we need a little more publicity about how to do it, without increasing the numbers of abortions?

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar image above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 




Share
%d bloggers like this: