Issues & Insights
COVID-19 virus. Source: HFCM Communicatie, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en).

I&I/TIPP Poll: Who Are The Real COVID Extremists?

To hear the media tell it, Americans are bitterly and broadly divided over COVID-19 and the policies enacted to mitigate its spread and save lives. But while there remain significant differences among political affiliations, the degree of agreement among Americans on COVID-19 policies is noteworthy, new data from the I&I/TIPP Poll show.

Media coverage of COVID-19 this year has often focused on the degree to which the “right” and “conservatives” have refused to heed government imposed mandates and rules to deal with the fast-spreading virus. Coverage, as numerous studies and reports have shown, has been highly politicized.

To find out if this is true, the December I&I TIPP Poll asked Americans “Generally speaking, in your opinion, how effective have the following been in controlling the spread of coronavirus?”  

Respondents rated three types of mandates: Mask mandates, lockdowns, vaccine mandates using a Likert scale — Very effective, Somewhat effective, Not very effective, Not at all effective, and Not sure.

Overall, for mask mandates, 72% of those queried said they were effective, versus 24% saying they weren’t. For lockdowns, the comparable numbers were 66% and 29%. For vaccine mandates, 63% to 31%.

The data come from the I&I/TIPP Poll’s survey of 1,301 adults, conducted online from Dec. 1-4 by TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence, I&I’s polling partner. The poll’s margin of error is +/-2.8 percentage points.

The breakdown by political ideology shows some differences, of course. Opinion is never monolithic.

On the topic of mask mandates, for instance, 61% of those who call themselves conservatives describe mask mandates as “effective,” versus 35% who don’t. Among moderates, 75% call masks effective, and 20% don’t. Liberals are the real ideological outlier here: 88% see masks as working, versus just 9% who don’t.

The differences are bigger when it comes to lockdowns. Conservatives by 53% to 42% say lockdowns are effective, while moderates stand at 70% versus 25%. Again, liberals are far higher, at 85% and 12%.

On the increasingly touchy question of vaccine mandates, conservatives still overall call them effective, by 51% to 44%, while moderates come in at 69% to 26% and liberals at 81% to 15%.

Breaking it down by party affiliation rather than simply ideology, one sees little overall difference within each group.

Among Democrats, for instance, 89% see mask mandates as effective, while just 7% demur. That’s very close to how liberals see it.

Republicans by 54% to 42% see mask mandates as helpful, similar to conservatives, while independents go 65% to 31%.

On the question of lockdowns, 85% of Democrats see them as effective, while just 11% don’t. For Republicans, it’s 48% to 47%; for independents, it’s 58% to 37%.

And finally, on vaccine mandates, the breakdown goes: Dems 84% effective to 13% not effective, Republicans 44% to 49%, and independents 57% to 38%. This is the only question that Republicans did not have a majority agreement with the other parties.

And that is the surprising point in this data set: That, among all parties and ideologies, there is majority agreement on the effectiveness of the policies that have been pursued so far to deal with the spread of COVID-19 and its growing number of genetic variants.

The agreement varies only by degree. Significant numbers of people on the right and the center have reasonable objections to COVID policies, such as mandatory vaccines for children, that politicians would be wise to heed.

Indeed, of all the political groupings tracked by I&I/TIPP, the only groups that show virtually no objection to the most draconian masking, vaccination, and lockdown policies are the Democrats and their ideological kin, the liberals.

Ironically, those same groups were strongly anti-vaccination when President Trump made his big push in 2020, but today with both the White House and Congress controlled by liberal Democrats, are the strongest proponents of sweeping government anti-COVID measures, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

Unfortunately, this overarching majority agreement is muted or ignored by the mainstream media, which from the beginning has politicized the government’s COVID-19 response. Those who disagree with or oppose individual policies pushed by the current administration, especially on the new Omicron variant, immediately get labeled as “fringe” or “right wing,” or even “conspiracy theorists.”

Yet, even some center-liberal groups and think tanks today are backing away from the politically polarizing formula applied by the media to all things COVID. And, when it comes to COVID-19 policy, liberal Democrats are the least nuanced and differentiated in their views of all.

“We found no evidence that closing all non-essential businesses, for example, reduced the growth in deaths, and yet these policies predict worse economic outcomes, measured in several ways,” noted a recent Brookings Institution report. “A growing number of economists and policy experts are starting to question the wisdom of stay-at-home-orders and other extreme measures.”

And literally hundreds of other studies and research reports agree.

As our data suggest, when it comes to COVID-19 policy, liberal Democrats are the least differentiated in their views of all the major political groupings. Though the media appear blind to that, it’s a far clearer sign of politicization on the issue of COVID than the more nuanced takes of the conservatives and moderates. The left are the real extremists on this issue.

As a New Year arrives, I&I/TIPP will continue to provide timely and informative data from our monthly polls on this topic and on others of interest. TIPP has distinguished itself by being the most accurate pollster for the past five presidential elections.

Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill O’Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTV’s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

7 comments

  • The article says, “Ironically, those same groups were strongly anti-vaccination when President Trump made his big push in 2020”

    That’s a lie that Trumpists keep repeating. Democrats were never anti-vaccination. They were against taking Trump’s word on whether the vaccine was well-tested and safe. They said they would take the experts’ word on it.

    The irony is that it’s Trump’s followers who now take neither Trump’s nor the experts’ word on whether the vaccine is well-tested and safe.

    • So…..
      The “vaccines” do not cure COVID.
      The “vaccines” do not prevent the spread of COVID.
      They do not prevent COVID re-infection (breakthrough).
      The “vaccines” deplete the immune system, in particular cancer-fighting T8 cells.
      They have a long record of serious side-effects, including permanent disability and death. Most hospitalizations and deaths are from the “vaccines”, not the COVID virus itself.
      Independent research by several accredited researchers claim in-between 150,000 and 200,000 Americans have died from the vaccines..

      They are not vaccines at all but experimental gene modifiers.

      Now, tell me again why I am supposed to get vaccinated?

      • COVID vaccines are like other vaccines, except for the manner in which they deliver virus proteins to your body, so that your immune system can develop antibodies to them. Like other vaccines, they prevent many cases of illness and death, but they are not 100% effective. Significant long-term side effects are very few. It is much safer for most people to get the vaccine than not to get it.

        But anti-vaxxers are telling a lot of lies about them. Including that they are not vaccines, and are ineffective and dangerous. Including that they modify your DNA.

        And the claims of hundreds of thousands of Americans dying from the vaccine are misrepresentations of the data.

  • And the truth is:
    + Lockdowns did virtually nothing as it is impossible to stop the spread of a virus once it’s ‘in the wild’. Spread can be slowed somewhat, but to what end?
    + Numerous studies show that masks are essentially useless, akin to stopping mosquitoes with a chain link fence. The details of studies (Many only now being peer reviewed) indicate that medical grade surgical masks are most effective, but only when worn by trained personnel and properly fitted. They also need to be changed several times/hour. Studies that show videos of slo-no sneezing assume people sneeze and cough all day long, and they also neglect to show what happens to any droplet-trapped virus particles contained by the mask (they are inhaled directly into the lungs when the droplet evaporates, dramatically increasing the viral load of the mask-wearer)
    + Natural immunity is a real thing and at this point of an epidemic well over 90% of a population has been exposed and has had an immune system response.
    + Subsequent variations tend to be more contagious (spread more easily) but increasingly less deadly (their are exceptions, but evolutionary pressure applies to viruses too.)

  • Amazing how stupid people are. Masks, lockdowns and pretend vaccines do not do anything, yet most people overall still believe they do, even though its pretty obvious they don’t and didn’t do anything. Our society is churning out morons.

    • Good thing no one is pushing any pretend vaccines. The ones we have are saving lots of lives.
      Unlike the pretend cures from the Trumpists.

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar image above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 5,546 other subscribers

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

Share
%d bloggers like this: