Issues & Insights

The White House’s Hammer And Sickle

Thursday’s Senate confirmation hearing on Saule Omarova, President Joe Biden’s choice to be comptroller of the currency, confirmed that she is the wrong person for the job. Flags the color of those that once were raised over Moscow were flying throughout the three-hour session.

Omarova is a professor of regulation of financial institutions, banking law, international finance, and corporate finance at Cornell. As comptroller of the currency, she would ensure that the “federal banking system operates in a safe and sound manner.”

The White House says she “​​is eminently qualified and was nominated for this role because of her lifetime of work,” and is “a leading academic” in her field. 

Her critics, however, see someone whose policy positions are far out of step with a market economy.

Britain’s Daily Mail has labeled her “​​Biden’s new comrade.” Townhall’s Katie Pavlich says Omarova is a “Communist” who “wants all bank accounts to be controlled by the Fed.” South Carolina Republican Sen. Tim Scott said during Thursday’s hearing that “I cannot think of a nominee more poorly suited to be the comptroller of the currency based solely on your public positions, statements and the weight of your writings than you are.”

The Kazakhstan-born Omarova, educated at Moscow State University, where she had a Lenin Personal Academic Scholarship, which “recently disappeared from her resume,” and also at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Northwestern University, has described herself as a “free-market idealist.” She swears she knows “that Soviet-style communism doesn’t work.”

“I’ve lived through it. That system was deeply flawed. It’s dead.”

Yet she envisions the creation of “National Investment Authority,” which would bypass Congress and use public and private resources to fund “vital infrastructure and the real economy.”

In those writings referred to by Scott, she offered “a blueprint for a comprehensive restructuring of the central bank balance sheet as the basis for redesigning the core architecture of modern finance,” which would “complete migration of demand deposit accounts to the Fed’s balance sheet.” Meaning that “there will be no more private bank deposit accounts, and all of the deposit accounts will be held directly at the Fed.”

Omarova’s intellectual rambling is a plan that “inherently conflicts with economic freedom and, instead, proposes to put a ruling class directly in charge of everyone else’s economic decisions,” says the Cato Institute’s Norbert Michel. Other work from Omarova, he adds, “exposes ideas that are even more fundamentally opposed to a free enterprise system and the American system of government.”

Let’s be straight here. If Omarova were a free-market idealist, no Democrat would ever nominate her for an administration slot, or even hire her to clean gender-neutral White House restrooms. The political left does not believe in markets – it is dedicated to central planning, to ruling rather than representing, to a hand around the neck rather than the invisible hand of Adam Smith.

Credit GOP Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania for being a strong counterweight to the Democrats’ “aw, shucks, she’s just a taken-out-of context academic who loves her adopted country and is the best person for the job.” Risking, and of course receiving, derision from the other side of the aisle, the ranking member of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee exposed Omarova for who she is.

“You advocated that the Federal Reserve set prices across our economy by openly buying and selling commodities to manipulate the price to where the Fed wants it to be,” Toomey said, also noting that as comptroller of the currency, given the job’s wide-ranging and discretionary powers, she would get to decide “who gets to open a bank and who doesn’t.”

“You’d get to decide what kind of loans could be made and which ones can’t,” Toomey continued. “You could forbid a bank from a merger. You could forbid a bank from opening new branches. You could create, or destroy, a whole category of bank charters.”

With thank kind of power, she could bankrupt “smaller players” in the coal and oil-and-gas industries, which she has said is exactly what “we” should “want” “if we want to tackle climate change.”

When given the opportunity Thursday to explain herself, Omarova said that she “absolutely” does not want to ruin these companies, claiming she “misspoke.”

“It was not a well-phrased sentence,” she said

That’s a bit more unique than an “I don’t recall” response but is equally unbelievable.

Finally, let’s try to square Omarova’s claim that the Soviet economic system is dead with her yearning-for-the-old-days tweet in which she said, “say what you will about old USSR, there was no gender pay gap there. Market doesn’t always ‘know best.'”

Her attempt to dig herself out of that hole only took her deeper.

“I never claimed women and men were treated absolutely equally in every facet of Soviet life. But people’s salaries were set (by the state) in a gender-blind manner. And all women got very generous maternity benefits. Both things are still a pipe dream in our society!”

She might have left the classrooms of her Soviet education behind in Moscow, but the lessons clearly never left her.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

Will You Help Us In The Fight For Free Speech?

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

2 comments

Rules for Comments: Getting comments posted on this site is a privilege, not a right. We review every one before posting. Comments must adhere to these simple rules: Keep them civil and on topic. And please do not use ALL CAPS to emphasize words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • This nomination is absurd and those who advised Joe Biden to make it deserve Lenin’s description of far-left Americans as “useful idiots.” Slow Joe and his world of woe continue apace.

  • There is a consistency here. What many call “the stolen election of 2020” is the rough equivalent of the Russian Revolution (i.e. the Potemkin soviet seizure of government in 1917). Thus, it is only fitting that a follower of Lenin steeped in communism is inserted into a powerful ruling position. The true nature of the Democrats and the consequences of the GOP stepping aside and allowing unaudited election hijinks in 2020 is coming home to roost.

    Toomey is an enabler who allowed Pennsylvania to go unaudited in the election. This one opposition to one member of the ongoing communist takeover of the USA government from the DoD to the Treasury is welcomed. But in a 50-50 Senate, it may be like spitting in the wind. The communists could win the treasury department in a 50-50 Senate, just as they won control of DoD. This Treasury appointment is a brazen part of a complete methodical communist takeover of all branches of government. But Treasury is special, because Lenin realized the currency is a way to bring a nation to its knees. Bolstered by their big Stimulus wins with GOP collaboration, the Democrats are clearly rejoicing and emboldened in their ongoing government takeover and Great Societal Reset. Hopefully, Toomey’s positive grandstanding will bear other than bitter fruit.

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 5,513 other subscribers

We Could Use Your Help

Will you help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left? Issues & Insights is published by a team of volunteers who believe in free speech and in quality journalism. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: