Issues & Insights

The Public Deserves To Know If The Chauvin Verdict Was Based On Fear Of Riots

Rosa Pineda

I&I Editorial

Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty Tuesday of all counts against him in the death of George Floyd. It’s possible that the jurors believed that the evidence showed he is truly guilty of a pair of murder charges and one count of manslaughter. But what if they convicted him simply to avoid riots?

Unless the jurors agree to talk about their deliberations and share their inner thoughts, we’ll never know if they surrendered to the mob and convicted a man whose guilt they had doubts about. So we’re left to always wonder.

Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld was exactly right when he said Tuesday that if the verdict “didn’t go a certain way . . . there was going to be destruction.” California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters whipped up as much rage as she possibly could, telling itching-to-riot “protesters” just prior to jury deliberations to “stay on the street” and “get more confrontational” if Chauvin was acquitted.

But the matches had been previously lighted, the gasoline ready to be poured. With or without her rant, the riot stage was set. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, as well as the state Attorney General Keith Ellison, repeatedly declared him guilty of murder, says Power Line’s Scott Johnson, “in an atmosphere of mob justice.” Walz even called another news conference “to do it again” Monday “as the Chauvin jury retired to deliberate.”

What chance did this jury ever have of reaching a just decision?

Judge Peter Cahill, who presided over the Chauvin trial, was clearly concerned that the jury’s fear of violence and looting could have been a factor in the outcome. While he denied the defense’s motion when it asked for a mistrial based on Waters’ incendiary statements, he did say she “may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned.”

The political left has been complaining about justice in this country for some time. In most cases, injustice in the minds of progressives, Democrats, and various agitators is any outcome they don’t like. Their notion of justice has no relationship at all with true justice.

The “justice” they seek is handed out on the streets, outside the law and inserted by threat into courtrooms. It is not only contra to American jurisprudence – which isn’t perfect but is the most righteous the world has ever seen – it is unfair, unmerciful, and primitive.

Tuesday’s verdict might well have been justice for Floyd. We want to believe the jury got it right and the system worked. But we can never be certain because the quite real threat of riots make it impossible to be sure. Unless the Chauvin jurors open up, there will always be that nagging sense that the mob won this one, and will capitalize on its success to eventually destroy true justice in America.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

Will You Help Us In The Fight For Free Speech?

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

3 comments

  • Fear of riots and (more likely) fear of being doxxed by the media. Media activists (formerly called journalists) had already hinted that if the jury found him not guilty that their names and addresses would be revealed. The jury had no choice in the verdict.

  • The POTUS Joe Biden called for a “right” verdict.
    Congresswoman Maxine Waters calls for more confrontation if there is not the right verdict.
    The Governor of Minnesota called for a guilty verdict.
    The AG of Minnesota, alleged wife beater, Ellison called for a guilty verdict and withheld all of the other videos of what happened until the trial so all anyone saw for a year was the cop on his neck.
    The Mayor of Minneapolis called for a guilty verdict
    The local media doxxed the Jury members.
    A pig’s head and its blood was spread on the house of a witness.
    BLM threatened to burn the town if the verdict was not guilty
    The Judge DENIED a change in venue!!!
    The Judge did NOT sequester the Jury
    The alternate juror is now on record she feared for her life and property. You think the other jurors had the same thoughts…Duh here.

    And this is called a fair trial? NOT. The 5th, 6th, 14th Amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 just went to Hades. We are now officially a Third World Banana Republic.

    Cops are resigning in mass, retiring in mass, police dept’s cannot find enough recruits to fill vacancies and everyone will wonder why Black Communities and others will have decreasing law enforcement and higher crime rates. And Gun Sales are again at an all time record.

    I hope all the Democrat run cities where all this mayhem is happening are happy and will enjoy their just deserts.

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 5,467 other subscribers

We Could Use Your Help

Will you help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left? Issues & Insights is published by a team of volunteers who believe in free speech and in quality journalism. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: