Issues & Insights

What If The NCAA Finals Were Run Like The 2020 Election?

Photo by Howard the Duck, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

With all the chaos in America after the 2020 election results, many people have asked whether the election process was “fair”, as Democrats insist that it was.

Since it is now time for the Final Four, I thought it would make sense to look at a hypothetical National Championship game and see how the Democrats would create a new set of rules to ensure a similarly “fair” outcome.

Let’s assume we have two college basketball teams in the final game – Duke and Kentucky, and let’s pretend that the Duke Blue Devils are Democrat, and the Kentucky Wildcats are Republican.

Because basketball games can’t be influenced by Big Media and Big Tech, and they have clear rules that are applied equally to each team, the Democrats came up with three new rules. These are the new rules:

1. Because the Democrats (Duke) don’t have Big Media on their side to make every play easier for their team and every play harder for the Republican (Kentucky) team, each Kentucky player is required to wear a 10-pound ankle weight on each ankle. This seems “fair” to the Democrats.

2. Because the Democrats (Duke) don’t have Big Tech on their side to control biased information, they must control the referees: fouls will only be called on Kentucky, never on Duke. This also seems “fair” to the Democrats.

3. And finally, because the Democrats (Duke) can’t manipulate voter registration, do harvest balloting and provide funding for “voter education” in order to win the game ($350 million from Mark Zuckerberg alone – mainly spent in swing states), it seems “fair” to make the Kentucky hoop 18” in diameter with the Duke hoop being 36” in diameter. Making it easier to score if you’re a Democrat also seems “fair”.

So, in this hypothetical National Championship, with America watching, the game was very close, even with these rules! But Duke ended up winning, in over-time, 51-49. And they were crowned the National Champion!

Now we are left with these questions:

Did Duke steal the game, or win it fairly?

Did the Democrats steal the election, or win it fairly?

Who do you think would have won this game without these three new rules?

You decide.

Thomas W. Lewis is owner and CEO of the T.W. Lewis Company and author of “Solid Ground: A Foundation for Winning in Work and Life.”

Will You Help Us In The Fight For Free Speech?

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

1 comment

  • Calling Diana Moon Glampers.Calling Diana Moon Glampers. You’re late to the prediction party.

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 5,434 other subscribers

We Could Use Your Help

Will you help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left? Issues & Insights is published by a team of volunteers who believe in free speech and in quality journalism. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on the Tip Jar above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: