Issues & Insights

Riots In Defense Of The Narrative Are No Vice

HACAT_V46

I&I Editorial

It’s widely known that our betters say it’s OK to protest in massive groups despite the risk of coronavirus transmission, but small gatherings not in support of Black Lives Matter are still unacceptable. Now we’re told that it’s also fine for protests to turn violent as long as it happens for the “right” reason. Imagine, though, the howling that would have pierced our ears had there been a whiff of violence started by the protesters whose only demand was to be set free of the pandemic lockdowns.

Watching these developments, including the conquest of a chunk of Seattle by a band of louts, we are reminded of David Bowie singing “this is not America” 35 years ago. We’re losing what we were and becoming something much less than that. The evidence is in the following statement.

“Non-violence is an important tool for protests, but so is violence,” Wellesley College professor Kellie Carter Jackson recently said in a Slate interview.

Before dismissing that outrageous assertion as a lone and therefore meaningless opinion, consider that the acts of thousands are often cued by a single person. Then take a look at the effort to normalize that sort of thinking:

  • Democratic Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey described the unrest as “a once in a lifetime opportunity,” adding, “yes, America is burning, but that’s how forests grow.”
  • According to California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters, “young people, they have a whole new definition for ‘looting.’”
  • New York Times reporter Nikole Hannah-Jones, who directed the utterly mendacious 1619 Project, which might be the most racist screed published in the mainstream in this century, said “destroying property, which can be replaced, is not violence.”
  • Essence magazine, which is by no means an underground publication, and surely holds some influence over its readership, recently posted an op-ed headlined “Burn It All Down.”

The Democrat-media-academe indoctrinalization complex of course is fine with all this. But when some rough-looking armed men hold a peaceful protest against the governor’s lockdown order on the steps of the Michigan capitol, we’re told they are dangerous extremists who created “a powder keg dynamic,” and were a “great security risk.”

Yet even the hard-left British Guardian admitted “the protest was largely calm,” which could not be said of the George Floyd demonstration “turned violent” a few weeks ago in Michigan in which “protesters smashed windows of the Romney Building, where the governor’s office is located,” says the Detroit News.

Similar tame protests in Huntington Beach, California, and elsewhere cranked up the social media mob, which characterized the demonstrators as selfish, disrespectful, fools, idiots, entitled a**holes, stupid, and contagious. Only days before she was excusing the looting “dedicated” to the memory of George Floyd, Waters said the lockdown protesters should be “ashamed of themselves” and “should not be encouraged in any way.”

The responses of course remind us of the Tea Party. It was accused of being a comfortable home for racists, Obama “birthers,” bitter clingers on the fringe, “nativist freaks, village idiots and Internet Hitlers.”

We were told that Tea Party activists were potentially violent, domestic terrorists, and haters. But the events were nearly always peaceful, and often upbeat. Participants even earned a reputation as self-policing demonstrators who cleaned up after themselves.

Contrast that with the Occupy Wall Street movement, which “had a profound effect on the conversation in the Democratic Party,” and was beloved by the media, and academia. It was overflowing with surly agitators who urinated and defecated in public spaces, destroyed private property, created “piles of stinking refuse,” and harassed people.

The Occupy progeny are now in Seattle. There, Christopher Rufo writes in City Journal, “Black Lives Matter and Antifa-affiliated activists have engaged in a pitched battle with Seattle police officers and National Guard soldiers.”

The city eventually decided “to abandon the East Precinct and surrender the neighborhood to the protesters,” leaving “Black Lives Matter protesters, Antifa black shirts, and armed members of the hard-Left John Brown Gun Club” free to seize “control of the neighborhood.” The barricades have been moved “into a defensive position,” and the area declared the “Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone.”

Says Rufo:

The Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone is an occupation and taking of hostages: none of the neighborhood’s residents voted for Antifa as their representative government. Rather than enforce the law, Seattle’s progressive political class capitulated to the mob and will likely make massive concessions over the next few months. This will embolden the Antifa coalition – and further undermine the rule of law in American cities.

This is apparently acceptable, because when President Donald Trump told Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan to “take back your city now,” he was told, in essence, to mind his own business – and that he is the problem.

While the media are generally ignoring Seattle because, says, DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall, it “is a bridge too far for even a sympathetic media to cover,” the lack of coverage is tacit approval. In Latin, the phrase is “qui tacet consentire videtur.” In English, we’d say “silence means consent.”

Those entering the six-block section of occupied Seattle are told via cardboard sign “you are now leaving the USA.” What’s meant to be a taunt is closer to accidental reality. Maybe we’re more on the money than we first thought when we lamented what we’re seeing is not America.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to use our decades of experience to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we think our approach to commentary is sorely lacking both in today’s mainstream media and on the internet. You can help us keep our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

9 comments

  • Might be a good idea to shut off power and water to CHAZ and let no one in and out until they are ready to surrender, Also pipe in some heavy metal 24/7. My brother suggested GWAR. Whatever is done, do not fgo in with troops. We do not want this to turn into something like the Waco disaster a generation ago.

    • Agree..the job of ANY Communist Insurgency is to provoke a response…which is used to support the bogus narrative that Trump is a violent racist. Instead…shut off water ..engage in PSYPOPS … cut off Food Supply…Loud Music with pamphlets dropped in using PSYOPS…Make it ridiculously hard to even live in the Zone…then eventually bring back the Police.

  • The Left and the Right have been playing this game with different rules.

    Perhaps it’s time to consider using the Rules of the Left against them.

  • Two quotes from founders most will soon realize are more important than thought:

    “The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.” John Adams

    “Society [has] a right to erase from the roll of its members anyone who rendered his own existence inconsistent with theirs; to withdraw from him the protection of their laws, and to remove him from among them by exile, or even by death if necessary.” Thomas Jefferson to L. H. Girardin, 1815

    This will not end well…neo-Marxist will guarantee continued violence and Planned Chaos.

  • It would be interesting to see the media reaction to the “occupation” of Bill Gates’ property in Seattle.

  • My concern is that if the civil authorities prevent the police from protecting private citizens and businesses from this thuggery, they are going to arm up and protect themselves. What’s to keep the people who rightfully own this “occupied” property from arming up or hiring private security forces to take back what is theirs. Is the wild west what we want?

  • Woah! So violence is justified if the cause is important enough. My cause, a return to a strict construction of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, is a just cause in my eyes. Therefore, I have the right to violence in support of my cause. Rioting, looting, assault and murder can all be justified under that logic. Of course, me using violence to defend my cause is just white privilege and the racist ramblings of yet another God fearin’, Bible totin’ redneck deplorable.

  • Well, conservatives seem to be suckers. Easily manipulated types content to sit back and hope a tin god will save them. Good advice: Follow the new creed, stop posting bluster, appear supportive if you’re going to continue in the congested areas. The vote’s still a long way off and it’s not going to do the trick. Above all: Continue being meek.

  • [print-me target="#post-%ID%"]

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 4,036 other subscribers

Donations

If you like what you see, feel free to leave a donation. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Just click on the Tip Jar above. It will take you to a PayPal donations page. Your contributions will help us defray the cost of running this site. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: