Issues & Insights

‘Oh, Let My People Go’ Back To Work!

Angelo DeSantis via Wikimedia Commons

There is no more providential time for America’s economic resurrection to begin than at sunrise on Easter morning.  Given the choice, many Americans are by now doubtless more than ready to reemerge from their C-19 shelters and go back to work in an economic fight that must be won lest they never have jobs to go back to or small businesses to reopen.

The question is whether the government will allow enough Americans to go back to work in time to save themselves and the economy from additional unnecessary damage.

One size does not fit all.  There are large areas of America where tens of millions of people can with prudent precautions go back to work with minimal workplace risk from C-19.

The federal government and the Federal Reserve Bank are by various means providing almost $6 trillion of direct and indirect assistance aimed at keeping the economic engine intact and ready to start running again when Americans are able to go back to work.  So why not let them do so in the low-risk areas? 

Calm cost-benefit thinking by the courageous is always better than panic and overreaction by the timid. 

It was unprecedented panic that triggered the unprecedented C-19 economic crisis in the first place. People initially stopped work and stayed home not because they were sick with C-19 or any other physical ailment, but, instead, because they were en masse scared out of their wits to a degree not readily explicable.

By now, it is said that more than 2,000 people have died in the U.S. from C-19. Tragic, but why so much panic – either now or back at the beginning of the C-19 crisis?

What is so different from the 1957-58 flu season when there were 116,000 U.S. deaths or 1968-69 when 100,000 people died from the flu in America?  In the 1990s, the average annual death rate from the flu was 36,000.  In none of those years was there even the hint of a panic. People did not stop work and hide. There was no economic crisis. 

Why the historic Panic of 2020?  Was it because scientists knew C-19 was not the flu but did not know what it was or how to treat it and had no vaccine?  Perhaps, but there were doubtless also mysteries about SARS and MERS in the beginning, vaccines are not always effective, and the Spanish Flu was the largest pandemic in modern history. Yet, to repeat, there was no panic and no economic crisis prior to C-19 in 2020. 

Mass communication, even the old-fashioned radio kind, can promote calm, well-informed courage (as in the case of FDR’s wartime fireside chats from 1933 to 1944) or it can cause mass hysteria and panic (as in the case of Orson Welles’ too realistic “War of the Worlds” radio-play in 1938).

Perhaps the C-19 virus would not have caused so much instantaneous fear and panic had the digital-age media not acquired the Orwellian power to bend the minds of 300 million people in a matter of hours.  Perhaps we would not now be in such dire economic straits had the media not chosen to exercise its power by scaring everyone out of their wits, scurrying for home, afraid to come out either to work or to shop and, thereby pulling the plug on both vital functions of the world’s largest economy: production and consumption.

We cannot at present know with assurance what caused the panic or whether the resulting “lockdown” was smart, dumb or somewhere in between.

We can be certain based on a growing volume of evidence that the media has enormous power over all political and public affairs and, when it chooses to do so, may be setting the national agenda and policy direction of the United States according to its own preferences.

The return to work will not be easy or quick and the return to the high-powered job-creating economy we had only a short time ago is by no means a certainty.

When Americans are heading back to work with prudence and innovative safety measures in place, the media may scare them out of it.  Governors and mayors may by law prevent people from going back to work and businesses from reopening.  As of March 24, 13 states had stay-at-home orders.  Altogether, 43% of businesses and 42% of workers had already been affected by such orders.

Socialist Democrats may take over the federal government and use the C-19 economic crisis as an excuse for preventing the job-creating, prosperity-producing capitalist economy from ever returning to its old self.

The one absolute certainty is that if Americans do not go back to work and restart both production and consumption, the economy will crash, never to rise again.

Ernest S. Christian, a lawyer, served as a tax policy official in the Treasury Department in the Ford administration.

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to use our decades of experience to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we think our approach to commentary is sorely lacking both in today’s mainstream media and on the internet. You can help us keep our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

4 comments

  • I can agree to a certain extent. What is known, beyond a doubt, is that this virus is highly contagious, more so than the seasonal Flu, & yes, there are vaccines for that. I believe, also, that COVID-19 strikes quickly, it seems so anyway, causing, in so many, great respiratory distress & easily can cause death. Our Healthcare facilities became so overloaded so quickly, just imagine if we didn’t try to at least slow the number of people who were exposed, many resulting in actually coming down with it. By limiting people & places where a lot of close contact happens, I think, helped a great deal. Because, where large groups of people did, and still do, congregate, it is found that at least one person has expossed who knows how many. Is that fair to others? Perhaps those who were afraid should be the ones to stay away? And how or who decides which businesses have to close & which ones don’t? Schools, over 1/2 of my husband’s grown kids and/or spouses work for our city’s school district. They are cleaning the classrooms now, but what happens when the kids return. Anyone who knows kids, knows they are walking germ factories. With all the hoarding morons are doing, can the schools guarantee they can have soap, paper towels, sanitizers, etc., on hand? I understand what you are saying & your points are very valid & while I agree that the hype from the media is a huge culprit, which is shameful & did nothing to help soothe people’s fears, the truth of the matter is that those, such as the 3 officials in N.Y. who encouraged people to carry on as usual & down played the seriousness of this virus, simply so they wouldn’t seem racist, should be made to publically explain themselves and their motives. Seriously, the Health Commissioner, of all people.
    Well, I’m sure I’ve said more than enough, and I really do hope things can get back on some kind of track soon. I feel it’s going to be a real job to figure it out. We do need a good share of positivity as we try to work this out. Our country has weathered all kinds of crisis’s in the past & made it thru, the difference between then & now is in the past we were all on the same side, now we are having to fight the enemies within. I hope that more people are really seeing the true colors of some people. Thank you for your article.

  • I have always believed in “one size does not fit all.” Whether it’s EmbalmerCare, education, or any other federal program, the locals get squeezed out for the benefit of the Swamp. Will we ever learn?

  • Amazingly, Early Results from Europe as reported weekly by the Euro MOMO project (European MOnitoring of excess MOrtality) this flu season is seen to be surprisingly mild compared to previous flu seasons in the EU in 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19. Check out their website at https://www.euromomo.eu/index.html

  • Ah, yes, another armchair epidemiologist heard from — one who has no conception at all of the need to flatten the curve, in order to prevent the nation’s healthcare system from being overwhelmed. A totally irresponsible article.

  • [print-me target="#post-%ID%"]

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 4,153 other subscribers

Donations

If you like what you see, feel free to leave a donation. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Just click on the Tip Jar above. It will take you to a PayPal donations page. Your contributions will help us defray the cost of running this site. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: