Issues & Insights

Democrats Might Find It Better To Concede 2020 To Trump

Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead

I&I Editorial

Have you seen the “Reelect Trump” commercials appearing daily on your TV? No, not those produced by the president’s campaign. They’re the marathon press conferences he’s been having in the White House briefing room, standing aside members of the administration’s coronavirus task force.

There has never been anything like them. A lot of Americans may be put off by the gruff, in-your-face, even braggadocious manner of leadership exercised by President Donald Trump. They may not believe everything they hear this president say. But seeing a 73-year-old tycoon with a reputation for self-promotion, who could be doing any kind of work or leisure he likes, yet instead pressing his nose to the grindstone in public service, day after day – actually hour after hour, apparently – amidst much ridicule, can assuage any and all reservations, probably even for many who voted against him.

“He is being the kind of leader that people need — at least in tone, today and yesterday — that people need and want and yearn for in times of crisis and uncertainty,” said Dana Bash of CNN, not one of this president’s favorite news sources. She said Trump “used the bully pulpit in the way presidents are supposed to.”

In 2010, by which time President Barack Obama had received the Nobel Peace Prize, apparently simply for saying during his 2008 campaign, “America seeks a world with no nuclear weapons,” Jonathan Alter, then with Newsweek, wrote a sycophantic book about Obama entitled “The Promise.” In it, he told of a genius chief executive who wowed everyone around him: “Nobody could think of a time when he hadn’t absorbed the briefing material before a meeting.”

He handled politics “like a Rubik’s Cube,” Alter quoted 2008 Obama campaign treasurer and current Barack Obama Foundation chairman Marty Nesbitt. “Before everyone else, he’s already calculated the relative probability of several different outcomes, so when one of them happens – even though it may be a surprise to others – he’s never really surprised.”

Yet Alter also admitted that important leaders “complained that they didn’t hear from him or, worse, had their calls returned by junior aides,” that Obama (unlike his successor) “avoided cable news chatter (‘WWF wrestling,’ he called it) because he didn’t think he could learn much from even the friendly shows.”

According to Alter, “his metier was the meeting … people who knew Obama were struck by his ability to ask probing questions, listen politely to competing views, summarize those views better than those who expressed them, and render a logical and dispassionate decision … Obama had somewhere acquired what the military calls ‘the habit of command.’”

In fact, the Obama the public came to know was a president whose eloquence usually depended on the presence of a teleprompter. (Something one admirer claimed was “because he’s too smart for his own damn good.”)

Trump the anti-Obama, by contrast, obviously burns up the phone lines and wears out TV screens watching the cable coverage disdained as worthless by his predecessor. Alter marveled that Obama “frequently called aides around 10 p.m. to frame the day’s events in terms of what came next.” But is that as mentally engaged as Trump’s “41 tweets an hour between 12 a.m. and 1 a.m.”?

As Much Sweat On His Brow As Joe Sixpack

Monday’s press conference, to take one example, began shortly after 6 p.m. and ended after the stroke of 8 p.m. After his prepared remarks – from which, as usual, the president frequently strayed, adding extemporaneous comments – Trump answered a pointed question about whether he would listen to his medical advisers on when to restore economic activities by pointing out that “parts of our country are very lightly affected.”

“Very small numbers,” he continued. “And, you know, you look at a state — great governor — Pete Ricketts, Nebraska. You look at the kind of numbers they have out there. They have one of the great — one of the great hospitals there, too, relative to what we’re talking about. But you look at Nebraska, you look at Idaho, you look at Iowa, you look at many — I could name many countries that are handling it very, very well and that are not affected to the same extent, or, frankly, not even nearly to the extent of New York …

“I’m dealing with Gov. (Andrew) Cuomo, and we’re dealing very well together. We’ll be sending that ship up, by the way. As you know, we have a ship going to Los Angeles. We’ll also be — the ship is coming out of a very large repair. It’s all ready to go and very soon will be. And over the next three or four weeks, that’ll be coming up to New York. It will go to New York Harbor and it’ll be fully supplied. So they’re working on that right now.”

Now granted, there is a shortfall in elegance here that one would expect from a man from Queens. And Nebraska, Idaho and Iowa aren’t “countries.” But would Obama, or other presidents of recent memory, have shown the public this much relevant knowledge of smaller states? Of the states’ pre-pandemic health care situation? Of the repair status of a military hospital ship pegged for a different state? Would Obama have felt as comfortable being on the phone every day with the tough-talking Cuomo? (Would he have ended up having aides tend to the calls instead?)

It may not much impress our sophisticated pundits, having watched JFK’s inaugural address far too many times for their own good, and binged on Gore Vidal’s political novels, but Joe and Jane Sixpack (who don’t know who Gore Vidal was, and don’t care), recognize someone with as much sweat on his brow as they have on theirs.

They also recognize a politician who can’t handle what Trump has been saddled with. The 77-year-old prospective Democratic nominee Joe Biden, speaking in a live stream from his home in Wilmington, Delaware, on Monday, fumbled all over his words. After calling for more medical personnel to deal with “this crush of cases,” Biden added, “And, uh, in addition to that, in addition to that, we have to make sure that, we are …” Then he motioned to staff to roll the teleprompter before exasperatedly saying, “Well, let me go to the second thing …”

Not only does this suggest possible senility, where is the Biden campaign’s judgment in conducting a live stream when it could easily have been taped, so they could edit and polish a perfect take of their candidate’s statement? What does it say about Biden that he has allowed himself to be surrounded by a staff this incompetent?

One thing it says is that a Biden presidency will be run by whoever ends up in his vicinity within the West Wing, in all likelihood a collective apparatus far to the left of the Democrat administration that came to power more than 11 years ago now. Witness Biden’s 180 on the Hyde Amendment last summer, discarding under pressure from the left a career-spanning position on abortion he had considered to be dictated by conscience.

Democrats and the media apparently don’t yet realize it, but it is so bad that – barring a brokered nomination that raises New York’s Cuomo to the podium in the summer – the party may even find itself conceding that you cannot win against an incumbent president during a global crisis that he is handling effectively. And according to Gallup, 60% approve of Trump’s handling of this emergency. Recall that Thomas Dewey garnered a mere 12 states and 99 electoral votes against Franklin Roosevelt in 1944 as the Second World War neared its final months. Today’s war is against COVID-19.

American voters will reward hard work and resolved dedication, even when they disagree with the one who toils on their behalf. It might be better for Democrats to avoid electoral humiliation.

— Written by Thomas McArdle

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to use our decades of experience to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we think our approach to commentary is sorely lacking both in today’s mainstream media and on the internet. You can help us keep our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

21 comments

  • The genius of President Obama was a construct. Simple as that. We still don’t know who he was, what he accomplished in school, nor from whom he received his earliest financial support. Valerie Jarrett probably knows, but does not say. The Obama presidency was the tribute vice pays to virtue; hypocrisy as partial payment for America’s original sin. President Trump, in contrast, actually does the work and delivers the goods.

    • We know he was elected to be the President of the Harvard Law Review by his peers.

    • When I think back on the dark days of the Obama regime, I can’t help but be reminded of the scene in Gladiator where Commodus rides triumphantly into the city soon after murdering his father, the emperor. One senator says to the other as they both observe the spectacle, “He enters Rome as a conqueror. But what has he conquered?”

    • President Obama was a construct. A Manchurian candidate created by the establishment. Hence all his records are sealed.

      Pete Buttgieg was meant to be the next one. But the MSM / Internet dynamic today is not the one of 2008… thank God.

    • We don’t know anything about what he accomplished in school – Time did an article on him when he was name editor of the law review. Can you name any other college students who were in Time’s? By the way, what were Trump’s grades in college? What did do in school. He sure as heck didn’t get in Time.

  • In the end, results talk while deceptive BS walks. One of Trump’s few genuine talents, of course, has been he is good at glitzy self-promotion while constructing “Potemkin villages” to impress his gullible #MAGA followers as a faux-businessman. Although it should be noted that despite all this, a solid majority of Americans still loathe the current president and did not vote for him in 2016.

    Unfortunately for Trump, the Covid-19 crisis won’t be solved by faux “leadership” in press conferences and TV appearances. It is ridiculous for I&I to declare “victory” after a single week of damage control. Let’s see how the president will spin the reality on the ground as his woeful lack of preparation in Jan-March has squandered the only advantage the U.S. had.

  • Although there may be some appeal to your arguments, the Democrats can’t afford to do that. Four more years of Trump judicial appointees would yield a court system that is so badly stacked against Democrats and liberal causes that it would be impossible for them to make any progress for at least a generation.

    • Trump has shifted the balance in the Supreme Court and appointed nearly 200 other conservative judges. Yes indeed elections have consequences and this is the biggest benefit of Hillary Clinton not getting elected. During his second term Trump will appoint at least one if not two more Supreme Court judges. He will also win the fight against the one world one government movement.

    • Impossible for them to overthrow our system of government for a generation, would be a more accurate depiction of the situation. If we got four more years of Trump, we could even survive 4 years of a Democrat in the White House after that.

    • Wait, isn’t the legislature where policies are supposed to be enacted? Activist judges in the courts aren’t the supposed to be the answer when you can’t win at the ballot box.

    • You are describing exactly what the leftists tried to do during the misery of the Obama regime.
      RBG was so very certain that Hillary Coattails would win that she refused to retire, depriving O. of another judicial appointment.
      For which, I am on my knees expressing thanks !!!

  • Obama was anybody a person desired him to be. Leftists like Alter infused into him their own greatest fantasies, and Obama’s blasé attitude made them believe that he had that special something that they do badly wanted him to have. Looking back, All Obama did was stutter, stammer read his teleprompter and get his slacks pressed just right.

  • Whoops….looks like I’ve stumbled onto a right-wing website. Obama all bad…….Trump all good?? and you know what? Rs aren’t all evil, nor are all Ds. But hat seems to be the dialogue nowadays, doesn’t it? Personally, I prefer a Prez who wouldn’t claim that concern for a possible pandemic is a democratic hoax…..and the repeatedly minimize the threat……” go away like magic” Really you buy that??? Obama, Biden, Hillary, Bush, McCain, romney, kasich, Reagan would say that ? There seem to be no standards here for trump for acceptable BS?

    Yes, the Ds should have nominated one of the younger more centrist candidates..so now we have a tough road. trum p has a spike in approval re handling this….but as deaths mount, compared to his foolish statements, will that approval hold? None of know of course..but I’m sure there will be those with crystal balls….following the trump example…stable genius that he is. wonder if the powers that be here will filtr my comment??

  • The Democrats should nominate a cute puppy for President. The women who dress in vagina costumes would definitely vote for the puppy. Drama queens, the sexually confused, the deviant…all would vote for the puppy. PLUS…the DNC could hand out stuffed animal puppies to potential voters. Imagine the tears, and emotion. Voting for a puppy would be the best vote a Democrat has made in their life.

  • “, standing aside members of the administration’s coronavirus task force.:
    To the writer: Mr. Trump does not stand “aside”, he stands front and center and “beside” members of the administration’s corona virus task force.

    aside[ uh-sahyd ]

    on or to one side; to or at a short distance apart; away from some position or direction:
    to turn aside; to move the chair aside.

    away from one’s thoughts or consideration:
    to put one’s cares aside.

    in reserve; in a separate place, as for safekeeping; apart; away:
    to put some money aside for a rainy day.

    away from a present group, especially for reasons of privacy; off to another part, as of a room; into or to a separate place: He took him aside and talked business.

  • The day this was published, March 26, just two days ago, we passed China and become number 1; in total number of coronavirus cases. Today, March 28th we are near 125,000 cases and tomorrow we may well pass 150,000. Trump said Jan. 22nd we have the virus under control. Jan. 30, very well under control, Feb. 23 & 24, very much under control, Feb. 26, we have 15 and …going down to close to zero. Feb. 27. its going to disappear. March 7. N I am not concerned at all. (Yes, who cares if thousands of us die.) March 18 tweet – I always treated the Chinese Virus very seriously
    Why, why would we vote for the most incompetent, dishonest, mistaken leader in our history?

  • [print-me target="#post-%ID%"]

Subscribe to Issues & Insights via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to I&I and you can receive notifications of new articles in your email. It’s simple, and free.

Join 3,579 other subscribers

Donations

If you like what you see, feel free to leave a donation. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Just click on the Tip Jar above. It will take you to a PayPal donations page. Your contributions will help us defray the cost of running this site. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is a new site formed by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

%d bloggers like this: