Issues & Insights
SISTEMA 12

Wuhan Coronavirus: Is The News As Fake As The Tales Of Global Warming?

I&I Editorial

The headlines are feverish. The stories beneath them imply that we’re doomed by the Wuhan coronavirus. It’s a media feast. But is it all raging overreaction?

It’s quite possible that it is.

“Don’t buy the media hype over the new China virus,” says the headline of a New York Post op-ed written last week by Michael Fumento.

“There appears to be nothing very special about this outbreak of the 2019-nCoV or Wuhan ­virus,” writes Fumento, a one-time colleague of the Issues & Insights editorial team. “It should actually be called the DvV, or Déjà vu Virus, because we have been through these hysterias before.”

A headline in Spectator USA on Saturday said much the same thing:

There’s no need to panic about coronavirus.”

The subheadline:

“Nasty bugs derived from Chinese livestock markets never fail to whip up mass hysteria.”

Reporter Ross Clark drew a parallel between the current frenzy and the World Health Organization’s 2005 prediction “there could be up to 50 million deaths worldwide” from the H5N1 strain of the bird flu, as well as a United Kingdom government adviser’s claim “that it could be worse than the Spanish flu of 1918.”

Meanwhile, he says, the Wuhan coronavirus “has been proving itself pretty poor at killing its host.”

In Monday’s PJ Media, science, health, and tech writer Charlie Martin said the outbreak is “(almost certainly) not the start of a worldwide pandemic that will kill hundreds of millions or billions of people. It’s not as deadly as SARS or MERS were.” He reminds us that “we in the U.S. had no Ebola epidemic in 2014. We did have an epidemic of Ebola panic, and the Ebola panic — like a lot of false news stories — had lasting effects.”

Fumento, an investigative journalist who has debunked several other cooked-up crises, looked at the numbers and compared the coronavirus to “the regular flu death rate.” The numbers: “8.5% to 17%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — considerably higher than for Wuhan.”

Of course the death rate “will be a lot worse in China,” he adds, “simply because health care there is vastly inferior.”

“It appears that, like flu, Wuhan usually kills through ­often treatable secondary infections. Well, treatable in the West. You’d be surprised at how many potentially deadly diseases ­(malaria, TB) Americans get that wreak havoc in much of the world but kill essentially none of us.”

So why all the frothing by the Western press? Fumento has the answer to that, too.

“Drama,” he says, because it “is badly needed” to stir the pot since the Wuhan virus doesn’t appear to be the killer it’s being made out to be.

Sounds a lot like the global warming fearmongering, doesn’t it? A media hungry to sensationalize the mundane and ever aching to demonstrate its social worth gets its narrative from agenda-driven researchers and activists, and takes it over the edge. It has relied on:

  • Late Stanford professor Stephen Schneider, who said in a 1989 Discover magazine interview that “to capture the public’s imagination … we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have.”
  • The researchers whose doctoring of the data to fit the narrative was exposed by the Climategate scandal.
  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who announced a year ago that the world would end in 12 years “if we don’t address climate change.”
  • Swedish teen Greta Thunberg, who lectures adults about greenhouse gas emissions, but, like all the other alarmists, can’t possibly know what’s going to happen.
  • The “hockey stick” temperature chart that supposedly shows global temperatures climbing sharply after the Industrial Revolution but has been called “100% fraudulent,” an “artifact of poor mathematics,” and a violation “of scientific standards” by those who have given it a hard look.

Though unlikely, the Wuhan coronavirus might turn out to be as deadly as the most pessimistic forecasters say it will. We can’t say the same about global warming. Odds are good that it will fade into nothingness as the “evidence” we keep hearing about never materializes.

— Written by J. Frank Bullitt


Issues & Insights is a new site formed by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. We’re just getting started, and we’ll be adding new features as time permits. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

Be sure to tell all your friends! And if you’d like to make a contribution to support our effort, feel free to click the Tip Jar over on the right.


We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.

Share

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

5 comments

  • This article seems to miss the point that WHO says not to panic, China says not to panic, all media didn’t report on this until it blew up by anons.

  • The article cites a mortality rate for the flu that is flagrantly and grossly incorrect.

    >>>Fumento, an investigative journalist who has debunked several other cooked-up crises, looked at the numbers and compared the coronavirus to “the regular flu death rate.” The numbers: “8.5% to 17%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — considerably higher than for Wuhan.”<<<

    The mortality rate for the flu is about .0013 that is a little bit more than a tenth of one percent. You can go to the CDC website and see this for yourself. Honestly, people in the US get the flu every year in their millions and millons. 9 to 45 million. Don't you think it would be unusual news if 1.5 to 8 million people died of the flu this year?

  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Representative Alexandria Ocasio – Cortez
    229 Cannon HOB
    Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-3965

    Representative Alexandria Ocasio – Cortez Comments on The Coronavirus Outbreak

    (Bronx, NY, January 2020) – Representative Alexandria Ocasio – Cortez will immediately release these comments to report the latest statistics, defenses being assembled to combat the Coronavirus epidemic and what her constituents can do to protect themselves.

    With the current number of persons affected at 2,750 and a death toll likely to climb past 80, the representative wants to reassure voters that she continues to do their work, with her constant push for socialism, impeachment, un-wavering support for high taxes, open borders and abolishing agencies meant to protect the United States homeland.

    “Mounting a defense for an epidemic is hard,” states Cortez, “because you can’t see the germs.” She continued, “And since you can’t see them, how do you know where to spray the Lysol?”

    The representative’s office released tips her constituency should follow to avoid the Coronavirus:
    1. Wash your hands, frequently
    2. Don’t stand too close to people who are or appear sick
    3. Wash your hands, frequently

    The representative pleads with her followers to be safe, follow protocols and stay away from Chinese takeout, for the time being.

    When asked if she was fearful of catching the Coronavirus, Ocasio – Cortez emphatically declared that she can’t contract it, because, as she states, “I drink Bud Light.”

    ###

  • I saw some footage the government didn’t want you to see, and it looks serious to me. When you say your going to rewrite the Bible like China is doing, and the Bible warns you not to mess with it, or the plagues in Revelation will come upon you, take heed.

  • “Though unlikely, the Wuhan coronavirus might turn out to be as deadly as the most pessimistic forecasters say it will.”
    Smart guy to make sure he has an out if needed.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
Share
%d bloggers like this: