Terry JonesPresident Donald Trump’s tariffs on imported goods suffered a Supreme Court legal rebuke in late February, but they’re not doing much better in the court of public opinion. As the latest I&I/TIPP shows, a plurality of voters don’t believe the economy will get a boost from tariffs, which win strong majority support only from Republicans.
It was once the case that most conservatives and many moderates rejected tariffs on imported goods as an unwanted distortion of free trade. Meanwhile, liberals embraced tariffs as a welcome tool of government “industrial policy.”
But President Trump has flipped the script. In the latest I&I/TIPP online national opinion poll, taken from Feb. 24 to Feb. 27 by 1,456 adults, voters were asked: “Do you think tariffs are a good way to strengthen the U.S. economy?”
By a solid plurality, Americans overall answered “no” (45%) rather than “yes” (34%). “Not sure” received 22% support. The poll has a +/-3.0 percentage point margin of error.
With Trump in office, self-described liberals are now anti-tariff, with 75% saying no, and 17% yes. Conservatives also reversed: Just 18% said no, while 62% answered yes. Those in the moderate camp were also anti-tariff: 54% no, 20% yes.
Politically, Republicans (61% yes, 20% no) were pretty isolated, with majorities of both Democrats (15% yes, 65% no) and independents (23% yes, 55% no) rejecting the economic benefit of tariffs.
That split showed up again earlier this year, as the New York Times reported: “While most Democrats have criticized Mr. Trump’s on-again, off-again approach as ‘chaotic’ and ‘reckless,’ they have displayed little consensus about embracing tariffs themselves as a policy tool.”
In short, the left may hate “Trump’s tariffs,” but they don’t object to their use in general.
Apart from political affiliation, there are notable differences among key demographic groups over tariffs.
Men (45% yes, 39% no), for instance, were much more likely to believe tariffs will boost the economy than women (23% yes, 45% no). Minorities also split: Blacks (25% yes, 49% no) diverged strongly from Hispanic voters (40% yes, 40% no) on the benefits of tariffs.
But how do Americans view the actual impact of tariffs? In a follow-on question, I&I/TIPP asked: “Which of the following comes closer to your view about tariffs?”
Among those polled, 43% agreed that “tariffs raise prices for consumers and businesses and may not significantly increase jobs,” while 34% said “tariffs protect U.S. industries from unfair foreign competition and can help create or preserve American jobs.”
Another 10% answered “neither,” while 13% weren’t sure. The poll has a +/-3.0 percentage point margin of error.
This is another area of American presidential policymaking in which responses track political affiliation.
Among Democrats, 63% were in the “tariffs raise prices” camp, while just 14% agreed that “tariffs protect industries.” For independents, the comparable numbers were 50% and 27%. Republicans? They flip the numbers, with 24% saying tariffs raise prices, but a solid 59% majority saying they protect U.S. industries and boost jobs.
Without broad public support and a green light from the U.S. Supreme Court, can tariffs still remain in place? Perhaps.
The Supreme Court’s decision did not ban tariffs or suggest they were illegal. Instead, the court found that Trump’s tariffs, put in place under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which Congress passed in 1977, could not be permanent.
That law gives Trump the power to levy tariffs on an emergency basis. In a dissent, Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that Trump erred in using the IEEPA as the basis of his authority. Instead, Kavanaugh cited the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the Trade Act of 1974, and the Tariff Act of 1930 as also justifying presidential authority for tariffs on a temporary basis.
Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution clearly gives Congress the power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises . . . ” But over the years, in six separate acts, Congress has given the president the tariff power, particularly during an emergency, but not to impose them permanently.
While two dozen blue-state attorneys general are suing to stop Trump’s tariffs, the Supreme Court’s recent decision was extremely narrow. It looked only at the IEEPA, not others.
So, legally, it remains a viable policy debate. Former President Joe Biden, it should be remembered, kept many of the tariffs from Trump’s first term, and even expanded some. But political criticism from Dems was muted or nonexistent.
Meanwhile, economists generally believe tariffs distort trade and boost the costs of imports, leading to greater inefficiency, fewer jobs, and a slowing economic output. But that hasn’t happened. At least not yet.
“My guess is that if you told a hundred economists that the average tariff rate was going to jump from 3% to well over 20%, many would’ve predicted a recession,” noted Ben Harris, director of economic studies at the Brookings Institution, former assistant Treasury secretary for economic policy under Biden. “And that was in fact not what we saw.”
The debate will go on. But ultimately, it will be public opinion that decides the fate of Trump’s tariffs. As of right now, as the I&I/TIPP Poll shows, public opinion on tariffs is not favorable.
I&I/TIPP publishes timely, unique, and informative data each month on topics of public interest. TIPP’s reputation for polling excellence comes from being the most accurate pollster for the past six presidential elections.
Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investor’s Business Daily.
In my opinion, Trump’s tariffs were necessary.
Biden left us-with his ignorance and his studious and unstudied negligence-a s-itstorm of economic, job, supply chain and foreign affairs problems. The tariffs will improve all of them to our benefit-and to the dis benefit of our chief adversary.
The problems included the very real fact that our foreign competitors and adversaries-like China-had used our trading policies to monopolize the supply chains which China based her trading policies on.
She was using her exports policy- and its vigor- as a foreign affairs machination and also as an assault against the US.
Consequently-and this can’t be stressed enough- she was using our belief in fair trade to trade unfairly (for instance by supporting many of its industries financially so that they could sell below the real market rate) -and was intentionally using its trade policies as a kind of foreign-policy and trade-scimitar.
Thus, we became dependent on the good will of an enemy nation to supply us with the things we wanted.
China’s malevolent intent on monopolizing the supply chains was made evident during COVID times, when the medicines and even the masks were used to game us and to profit China, shipping us inferior goods or no goods at all.
Think of it as what China is now doing to us with rare earth elements. We need these for the military and to help our economy and we were-before Trump enlarged the rare earth minerals playing field-depending on a malevolent adversary to supply them to us.
Trump recognized and addressed this oncoming tidal wave of a problem. The solution included tariffs.
His tariff’s fixed this supply chain problem by leading to many of the supply chain manufacturers to build their plants in the US, thus avoiding the tariff rise in prices which-even if absorbed (due to competition) reduced the manufacturer’s profit margin.
This re-basement of industry to our country will not only insure our security, but also increase our economic vitality and foment an increase of jobs in the job market.
Trump was absolutely right saying-in effect-that tariffs were one of the finest weapons-if used in the right way-to adjust foreign policy inequilibrium-and in this case to rebalance our economy.
It was our lucky day when this world famous entrepreneur ran and acceded to the Presidency. I don’t know anyone else who could have done this. Manage our decline, yes-but not turn it around.
By “nearly half” you mean democrats, right? My question is, who cares? So what if the losers in the last election don’t like tariffs? Every other country in the world treats the American market like a gravy train. Now they are being forced to contribute to America’s fiscal health, and the dems don’t like it because they are primarily a party of coastal port cities and Wall Street. The fact that “economists” don’t like tariffs is proof that Trump is doing the right thing.
Tariffs are like sales taxes. You get to choose whether or not you pay them. They are the most democratic way to tax. As for the phony “economists”, they have shown us over the last year that are mostly far left liars and usually wrong. Why the auhor even bothers mentioning what they “think” (that’s a laugh in itself) or what current leftist propaganda they are spewing they certainly don’t lend credibility to author’s thesis and neither do your ridiculously small sample polls.
Like with all polls, how you ask the question changes the results immensely . This is why polls are useless without knowing the how people were questioned. The fact that every country we export to has large tariffs on our goods, but nothing on those coming into our country is wrong, period. American companies have been getting screwed for ever, and now it’s time for a fair playing field.
What do stupid american peasants know about world economic history …
All Polls are Lies …
Such a ridiculous article. Nothing about the history of tariffs; or about how most people have no idea what they are- but what they hear from the propaganda media. The proper question is why haven’t income taxes gone down. Or more importantly why this Government seems to think it can spend any amount of borrowed monies.
Never asked me. I employed thousands of people and no pollster ever asked me a question.. Who are they asking? Fraud recipients?