Issues & Insights
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro delivers a speech. Source: Jeso Carneiro, via Flickr. License: CC BY-NC 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/).

49% Of Americans Back Trump’s Decision To Arrest Venezuelan Dictator Maduro: I&I/TIPP Poll

Do Americans support President Donald Trump’s decision to seize Venezuela’s leftist dictator Nicolas Maduro, despite a still-raging controversy in the mainstream media over the legality of the arrest? The answer is mostly yes, with some reservations, according to the latest I&I/TIPP Poll.

The national online poll of 1,478 adults was taken from Jan. 6 to Jan. 9, mere days after Maduro’s Jan. 3 arrest by the U.S. military on charges of narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, and possession of illegal weapons. The poll has a +/-2.9 percentage point margin of error.

Specifically, I&I/TIPP asked Americans: “Do you approve or disapprove of the United Statesโ€™ military operation that captured Venezuelan President Nicolรกs Maduro?”

Overall, a solid plurality of 49% said they either “approve strongly” (27%) or “approve somewhat” (22%) the arrest of Maduro, who seized power in 2013 after the death of previous strongman Hugo Chavez. The election that put Maduro into office was widely criticized by both left and right groups as fraudulent or “stolen.”

But 37% said they either “disapprove somewhat” (13%) or “disapprove strongly” (24%) Maduro’s arrest. Another 14% said they were not sure.

As is often the case these days, there are sharp political differences by party affiliation, perhaps due to what some have called the “Trump effect.

Democrats, for instance, opposed the military’s grab of Maduro by 58% (disapprove) to just 29% (approve). Independents were close to breakeven when the margin of error is factored in: 39% approve, to 42% disapprove.

Republicans were the only political group in which those approving (79%) were a clear majority over those disapproving (12%).

One other demographic group that shows an interesting divergence: men and women. Among men, 60% approve of arresting Maduro, while just 33% disapprove; women are evenly split, 40% approve, 40% disapprove.

And how do American Hispanics feel? It might be surprising to some, but they overwhelmingly support going after Maduro: 56% approve, 30% disapprove, nearly 2-to-1.

Ideology, likewise, shows clear distinctions: Those who call themselves “conservative” give 77% approval, just 14% disapproval; moderates, deliver a small plurality of 43% approval, 38% disapproval; and only self-described liberals reject the Maduro arrest, with 25% approving, 68% disapproving.

So it’s another bellwether issue between right and left.

As a follow-on question, I&I/TIPP also asked voters: “How important is each of the following as a U.S. priority going forward regarding Venezuela?” That was followed by five possible responses, with respondents asked to say whether each was “important” or “not important.”

“Ending political repression and restoring democracy” was called important by 75%, while only 58% thought “Securing Venezuelan oil resources” was important. “Strengthening regional security” won the backing of 73%, while “Preventing China and Russia from gaining influence in Venezuela” found support from 70%.

Finally, “Avoiding further involvement” got 73% support, a sign that Americans might not see Maduro’s arrest as a reason for ongoing involvement in the troubled Latin American narco-state.

Significantly, there was considerable agreement โ€” in this case, majorities of 60% or more โ€” among all political parties on all of the responses but for one: “Securing Venezuelan oil resources.” Both Democrats (46% “important”) and independents (48% “important”), while still a plurality of their respective parties, were the only responses that were below 50%.

So, while the arrest of Maduro gets somewhat mixed reviews based on political affiliation, most Americans want the endgame to succeed.

Not so some activists on the left.

“BLM activists, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdaniโ€™s Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and other groups met with Maduro, spoke at events alongside him or became official observers for Venezuelaโ€™s heavily-criticized elections for more than a decade, according to the groupsโ€™ public statements and online posts documenting the meetings,” reported the Daily Caller.

“Some of the same organizations called for protests in the U.S. against the Trump administrationโ€™s Jan. 3 arrest of Maduro and his wife on drug and weapons charges,” the Daily Caller added.

But will average Americans continue to support Trump’s actions in Venezuela?

It seems highly likely, especially if political changes bring major reforms to the country’s socialist economy and improve long-suffering Venezuelan citizens’ lives.

But voters will also likely be reminded in coming weeks and months that the main reasons for grabbing Maduro was to end the flow of deadly drugs and to reverse the flood of Venezuelan refugees (an estimated 20% of Venezuela’s population has fled Maduro’s illegitimate authoritarian regime). That seems to be the bottom line, both for the White House and for most Americans.

To accomplish all this, the U.S. has established what Secretary of State Marco Rubio calls a “quarantine” on Venezuela’s oil, which enables the U.S. to force reforms without sending in thousands of troops. That should buy time for political changes to be made in Venezuela’s government.

Meanwhile, as the I&I/TIPP Poll shows, Americans in 2026 clearly hope for the best for the Venezuelan people, and expect U.S. policies to bring about changes there.


I&I/TIPP publishes timely, unique, and informative data each month on topics of public interest. TIPPโ€™s reputation for polling excellence comes from being the most accurate pollster for the past six presidential elections.

Terry Jones is an editor of Issues & Insights. His four decades of journalism experience include serving as national issues editor, economics editor, and editorial page editor for Investorโ€™s Business Daily.

Terry Jones

Terry Jones was part of Investor's Business Daily from its inception in 1983, working in a variety of posts, including reporter, economics correspondent, National Issues editor and economics editor. Most recently, from 1996 to 2019, he served as associate editor of the newspaper and deputy editor and editor of IBD's Issues & Insights. His many media appearances include spots on the Larry Kudlow, Bill Oโ€™Reilly, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved and Glenn Beck shows. He also served as Free Markets columnist for Townhall Magazine, and as a weekly guest on PJTVโ€™s The Front Page. He holds both bachelor's and master's degrees from UCLA, and is an Abraham Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs.ย 

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading