Issues & Insights
Screenshot from energy.gov

Biden EV Road Trip Stunt Was Worse Than First Thought

When Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm and her staff of clowns bungled a four-day ramble in 2023 to show off the wonder of electric vehicles, the lasting impression would be the report of her advance team blocking an open charger so she wouldn’t have to wait for one. A federal report, however, reveals details that cast the entire charade in an even worse light.

The Granholm tour was to take her from Charlotte, N.C., to Memphis, Tenn., and was intended to justify the billions of taxpayers’ dollars the Biden administration was pouring into green energy initiatives. The message was lost when it was learned, two months after the incident, that “an Energy Department staffer tried parking a nonelectric vehicle” by a charger “to reserve a spot for the approaching secretary,” according to National Public Radio reporter Camila Domonoske, who was along for the ride.

Granholm’s “caravan of EVs — including a luxury Cadillac Lyriq, a hefty Ford F-150, and an affordable Bolt electric utility vehicle — was planning to fast-charge in Grovetown, a suburb of Augusta, Ga.,” said Domonoske. But “one of the station’s four chargers was broken, and others were occupied.”

It wouldn’t look good for the troupe to have to wait for a charge. After all, the entire purpose of the junket was to show the public that EVs are the way to travel. The optics became worse, though, when Granholm’s team “boxed out — on a sweltering day” a family “with a baby in the vehicle” using a car with an internal-combustion engine, Domonoske reported. 

Upset by the outrageous manners and ugly display of entitlement by federal functionaries, the family called the police. Turns out Georgia had no law prohibiting non-EVs from parking in charging spaces.

But that staffer did not commit the only misdeed by a federal employee on the rolling celebration. The Energy Department inspector general found that the government workers who supported Granholm were not “conscientious stewards of taxpayer funds,” and further noted that “conscientious stewardship is particularly crucial for matters involving high publicity.” Such as a public relations campaign to push a politically preferred mode of transportation.

In the special report issued earlier this month, the Energy Department Office of the Inspector General determined that within Granholm’s troupe:

36 of the 42 travel vouchers (86 percent) contained lodging expenses that exceeded Government per diem rates. Additionally, we identified seven travel vouchers for which travel expenses exceeded 15 percent of the authorized cost. Further, we found four travel vouchers for which government-issued travel cards were not used for expenses, as required. Moreover, travel voucher warnings addressing potential policy deviations and issues were unaddressed or inadequately justified.

Seems there was more at work than just “a series of events and townhalls highlighting the Biden-Harris administration’s new and existing efforts to build a clean energy economy, create clean energy jobs, and cut costs for all Americans.”

It was, apparently, a pleasure cruise for some staffers.

“The total cost of the 42 travel vouchers was $124,823.94. The total amount by which lodging expenses exceeded per diem rates was $9,487.50, with excess costs per traveler ranging from $50 to $634 per trip,” says the IG report.

“Travelers could have chosen different nearby hotels to reduce travel costs at the government’s expense; however, department officials mentioned difficulties finding hotels with functioning EV chargers onsite or nearby.” The former is indicative of the entitlement mentality among Washington bureaucrats, while the latter underscores the perils of EV travel that activists and politicians want to cover up.

Maybe it was all just a misunderstanding. Maybe the employees were not properly advised on federal travel rules. But our combined decades of observations indicate that government, at all levels, tends to draw people who couldn’t be more unsuited for the jobs they have.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

Share

I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.

7 comments

  • Those government employees knew exactly what they were doing. I worked for the federal government for decades and we had to do annual training on rules for travel expenses, etc. They knew but were arrogant about their privilege.

  • Names please. Shame, a missing trait among public employees needs to make a reappearance.

  • When government employees exceed the amounts pre-authorized for hotels, etc., while on travel, they are required to make up the difference out of pocket. The way the travel system works is that the trip is requested within certain parameters and approved, and then vouchered when the trip is done. The voucher needs to match the pre-approved amounts. So, unless the pre-travel plans were out of compliance from the git-go, and approved with waivers, the travellers would have only been reimbursed for the pre-approved compliant charges, not the overages. I think this reporting might be misrepresenting the travel costs a little to serve an agenda. I think the agenda was served without the extra charges thrown in, so might as stick to the facts!

  • You didn’t expect them to stay at a Motel 6 and dine at a nearby Waffle House, now did you?

  • It’s hilarious that some people are so shocked whenever they find out (YET AGAIN) that the Democrats are absolutely fraudulent!

  • Given the rank of those involved, I would bet that this route was pre planned and probably driven out at least once to avoid ‘inconveniences’, you know, like having to deal with those lowly common people who pay their salaries.

    They knew what they were doing, they knew what it would cost, they also knew that nobody would look when they padded their trip report for reimbursement… well until someone snitched em to the po po and word went public that is.

  • Biden dug the grave for his reelection with his Campaign against Fossil Fuels just to appease the Eco-Freaks and the Keep it in the Ground Idiots

kill the ads

For every $20,000 raised, we will eliminate One Ad Spot until we are completely ad-free!

To support this cause, click HERE.

Created using the Donation Thermometer plugin https://wordpress.org/plugins/donation-thermometer/.$100,000Raised $13,178 towards the $100,000 target.$13,178Raised $13,178 towards the $100,000 target.13%

So far, we have raised $13,178 toward our $100,000 target!

Once we reach $100,000, we will be free of Big Tech overlords!

Help us Kill the Ads! click HERE.

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by seasoned journalists who were behind the Pulitzer Prize-winning IBD Editorials page (before it was summarily shut down). Our goal then and now is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. I&I is a completely independent operation, beholden to none, but committed to providing cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that the nation so desperately needs. 

Share

Discover more from Issues & Insights

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading