Issues & Insights
Durham investigation: It all started with Hillary Clinton. License: CC0 Public Domain.

‘Russian Collusion: It Was Hillary Clinton All Along’

It was clear from the beginning that charges of “collusion” between Donald Trump and Russia during the 2016 election were phony — a cheap, and illegal, political trick. But they did their damage. While Trump beat Hillary Clinton, there has since been a non-stop Democratic Party-led campaign to tar him as a “traitor” or worse.

And, as the recent testimony of Special Counsel John Durham to Congress shows, Clinton lay behind this scheme to defraud American voters and throw an election. So, today, despite powerful evidence of official wrongdoing, we’re back where we were some seven years ago.

By the way, you might notice the headline above has quotation marks. That’s because it was the exact headline we placed on an editorial way back in August 2018. We didn’t need to change it a bit.

We wrote then: “It’s beginning to look as if claims of monstrous collusion between Russian officials and U.S. political operatives were true. But it wasn’t Donald Trump who was guilty of Russian collusion. It was Hillary Clinton and U.S. intelligence officials who worked with Russians and others to entrap Trump.”

After years of investigation, costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars and casting doubt on the outcomes of two presidential elections, will anything change? Not likely.

As Durham said Wednesday: “The FBI was too willing to accept and use politically funded and uncorroborated opposition research such as the Steele Dossier. It did so even after the president of the United States, the FBI and CIA directors and others received briefings about intelligence suggesting there was a Clinton campaign plan underway to stir up a scandal tying Trump to Russia.”

Durham emphasized that the FBI knew Clinton’s tale of Trump’s supposed ties to the Russians was false. So did the CIA and the NSA. So did President Barack Obama. But the FBI investigated Trump anyway under its now-infamous Crossfire Hurricane probe.

This didn’t spring from nowhere. It came at the prompting of CIA Director John Brennan, who in summer 2016 created what he called a “fusion cell” from the CIA, NSA and FBI to look into the charges. Conveniently, it disbanded shortly after Trump won election, leaving the FBI holding the bag with Crossfire Hurricane.

So, no, calling this a deep-state conspiracy is not paranoid. It’s a fact.

Worse, as it turns out, the FBI essentially became an arm of the faltering Clinton campaign, taking sides to throw an election. How? The nation’s top law enforcement agency used as its main evidence the now-debunked Steele Dossier, which Clinton’s campaign paid for.

This was the real collusion. It’s not overly dramatic to suggest this was, in essence, a pre-emptive coup attempt by deep state insiders.

As investigative reporter Lee Smith, writing in 2018, put it, evidence showed clearly “how closely senior Justice Department officials and the Federal Bureau of Investigation worked with employees of Fusion GPS, a Washington-based research firm reportedly paid $1 million by Clinton operatives to dig up dirt on the Trump campaign.”

Smith added this was all “part of a broad effort to tarnish the Trump campaign involving Hillary Clinton operatives employed by Kremlin-linked figures and Department of Justice officials.”

That is a conspiracy, plain and simple. And clearly one that favored the Democrats.

As Durham himself noted this week, the Justice Department and FBI did not apply the same standards to allegations they “received about the Clinton and Trump campaigns.” That’s right. Because they were working with Clinton. And because they feared her.

This crime is worthy of severe punishment for its perpetrators. Instead, only a handful were ever sanctioned or fired. The short list of those who lost jobs includes former FBI Director James Comey, former FBI No. 2 Andrew McCabe, former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, and just a few others.

As for Clinton, she once again skated for illegal behavior, just as she did for potentially revealing secrets to our enemies over her private email server while serving as secretary of State, a clear crime under the law, and for turning her State Department post into an illegal fundraising arm of the “Clinton Family Foundation.”

As Durham himself wrote, the FBI was informed about “a Clinton campaign plan to vilify Trump by tying him to Vladimir Putin so as to divert attention from her own concerns relating to her use of a private email server.” Did the FBI stop it? No, it investigated what it knew to be false.

Yet, like Clinton, the FBI, has escaped serious consequences for its actions. At minimum, it needs to be reformed from top to bottom. But that appears to be highly unlikely with a Democrat-controlled Senate.

Meanwhile, the Bureau continues to do the Democratic Party’s dirty work through its endless investigations of Trump, including the ongoing review of the J6 “insurrection” that the FBI itself might have played a role in instigating, and the senseless flap over “classified documents” that launched a paramilitary federal assault on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

So, as we said, nothing’s changed.

Political favoritism by the Justice Department and FBI undermines Americans’ confidence in their public institutions and the rule of law. The main instigator, Hillary Clinton, walks free, while Trump is subject to repeated probes.

Which means this will happen again. Indeed, it already is, with both Justice and the FBI appearing to look the other way as evidence grows of $30 million-plus in Chinese, Ukrainian and Russian bribes paid to the Biden family.

It is a dangerous thing when polls show people think that justice isn’t blind, but rather has its finger on the scale for one party over another. Durham, at least, understands that.

Near the end of Wednesday’s testimony, Republican Wyoming Rep. Harriet Hageman pointedly asked Durham: “How long do you think that this country will survive with a two-tiered justice system that seeks to persecute people on their political beliefs?”

“The nation can’t stand under those circumstances,” Durham responded. That’s perhaps his most damning comment of the entire four-year investigation.

— Written by the I&I Editorial Board

We Could Use Your Help

Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists of the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day -- without fear or favor.

We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press, and because we aren't afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left. Revenue from ads on the site help, but your support will truly make a difference in keeping our mission going. If you like what you see, feel free to visit our Donations Page by clicking here. And be sure to tell your friends!

You can also subscribe to I&I: It's free!

Just enter your email address below to get started.


I & I Editorial Board

The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.


  • How much more, and how much longer, will true patriots tolerate this criminally corrupt federal government? Is now, finally, the appropriate time to “refresh the tree of liberty”?

  • I remember trump, on national TV, calling out to Russia to please give me dirt on Hillary if you have it and that image alone is enough for me to know trump does not have Americas best interest at heart. No one aspiring to high government positions should be requesting the aide of a foreign country.

    • Your TDS is raging there lil’ Chrissy. Yes, he made those remarks, after the Russian Collusion hoax was beginning to be exposed.

    • Get real. That was nothing other than a rhetorical criticism of her use of unofficial and insecure email servers that were wide open to foreign intel hacking. It was quite reasonable to assume that all of her emails were compromised.

    • Trumps comments were clearly a joke. He was lampooning the
      Inability of american intelligence to get the emails. The emails in fact surfaced on the Weiner laptop. DOJ continued to ignore them

    • How’s Joe Biden working out for you?? Talk about requesting foreign aid!!

    • No, that’s not what you heard. That’s what you WANTED to hear because your TDS had already advanced to the crotch rot stage. His point was that because she was in violation of numerous federal statues regarding the handling of classified materials, the Russians, Chicoms, and anyone else who wanted it already had all of her information.

      If you were smart, and you’re not, you might have noticed a pattern emerge by now that sees Trump accused of and prosecuted for things Democrats actually did.

  • I believe that among those colluding to entrap President Trump was in fact British Prime Minister Theresa May and some of her minions such as sacked by Trump Ambassador “Sir Kim” Darroch, who signed off on the Steele report that was created by a British (ex?) spook.

  • Let’s not cheer Durham too much… this was all known years ago. Why didn’t he release his report before the 2020 election? He could have easily done so but then Trump would have easily won. But he purposely didn’t because his role was to slow walk the entire thing, just like Barr. Job accomplished. And IMHO Trump won anyhow but this would have taken it out of the “cheating” zone and they wouldn’t have been able to install their puppet Biden.

    • Durham was prevented, by Barr if I remember correctly, from releasing the report at that time.

    • trump DID win. imo, he took all 50 states. he lost due to theft. provable, but tptb keep blocking. only and idiot believes biden really won. 81 million votes, my ass (name of a song).

  • The Great Experiment can’t survive this level of corruption. If Justice isn’t fair then everything else is irrelevant. We’re being destroyed by a lack of a morals.

  • Has Hillary ever agreed to an in-depth, on-the-record interview about her personal culpability in her campaign’s Russia-gate activities in collusion with the FBI and CIA and the Obama Administration? Are we to conclude she knew nothing about them? Is that possible?

  • Before the 2020 election I read Peter Schweizer’s book “Profiles in Corruption”. I was shocked by what he revealed about the Bidens. Somewhere along the way Schweizer said that if elected, Biden will be the most corrupt man to ever sit in the Presidency. Joe’s bad, but I’m not sure if he has been proven most corrupt. The Clinton’s are terribly corrupt. Recall the Cattle Futures, FBI files, Whitewater, Travelgate, Jones/Lewinski, the Chinese Army and the 1996 election, taking all sorts of souveniers from the White House on their departure, the perjury charges — and then the Clinton Global Initiative which was nothing more than a sophisticated version of the stone-age pay-to-play effort we now see with the Hunter-Gatherer(Joe) Biden family.

    I live in a town jampacked with Democrats, and none of them care about any of this. In fact they all swear that every investigation has proven the Trump-Russia fairytale and Joe is amn of great integrity. Integrity is dead.

    • At this very moment Biden and Mayorkas have approved the CIA to train foreign entities be trained to invade the USA, they are then transferred to a base in Eagle Pass Texas to gain additional training while awaiting the orders to start the overthrow of our nation. It will come within the next 4 months. Time to prepare by forming local militias and training NOW.

      • oldbat, you can find the information on the web, if you aren’t too lazy, to thoroughly search for it.

      • you are the one making the assertions. you should provide the info even before asked. i just want to pass the original info on. not your assertions.

  • Love the title, “It was ..all along.” I’m pretty sure this is based on the Godfather where Vito says “It was Barzini all along”.

  • What is the answer?

    “…despite its “legalistic” tone, the term collusion has no specific legal meaning in criminal law; there’s no such criminal charge called “collusion,” nor does the term necessarily signal a criminal offense.” True or False

    Don Jr. meets with the Russians to get dirt on HC. Regardless of what happens, is that legal? Yes or No

    President Trump agrees to listen to information from a foreign government that could improve his chances of getting elected. Regardless of what happens, is that legal? Yes or No

  • Anyone who understood surface-level history of the 20th century knew this entire thing was nonsense from the word Go. There’s no need to pretend we learned anything new from this “investigation.”

About Issues & Insights

Issues & Insights is run by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our goal is to bring our decades of combined journalism experience to help readers understand the top issues of the day. We’re doing this on a voluntary basis, because we believe the nation needs the kind of cogent, rational, data-driven, fact-based commentary that we can provide. 

We Could Use Your Help

Help us fight for honesty in journalism and against the tyranny of the left. Issues & Insights is published by the editors of what once was Investor's Business Daily's award-winning opinion pages. If you like what you see, leave a donation by clicking on donate button above. You can also set up regular donations if you like. Ad revenue helps, but your support will truly make a difference. (Please note that we are not set up as a charitable organization, so donations aren't tax deductible.) Thank you!
%d bloggers like this: