President Donald Trump’s critics have called him many things during his nearly three years in office. “Racist.” “Fascist.” “Misogynist.” “Anti-middle class.” “Anti-poor.” And so on. But if that’s so, he’s failing miserably at all those things they accuse him of.
A spate of recent data and reports, including an update of the income and poverty statistics by the U.S. Census Bureau for 2017 and 2018, show just how bad that failure is.
Take that “racist” charge. The Census report shows that black unemployment, at 5.5% in August, is the lowest it’s been since records started being kept in 1972.
The gap between black unemployment and white unemployment is also the lowest on record.
Typically, the unemployment rate for African Americans is at least two times the white unemployment rate. Today, it’s about 1.6 times the white rate.
It isn’t only African Americans who are doing better. Both Hispanic-Americans and Asian-Americans now have near-record low unemployment rates.
Just ask the Washington Post. To its credit, it recently analyzed Labor Department data. What it found was shocking: More than 86% of the jobs added since the end of 2016 went to minorities. Out of 5.2 million new jobs, minorities accounted for 4.5 million.
If Trump’s a racist, he’s an abject failure.
What about that other favorite epithet of the left, “misogynist”? If Trump hates women so much, why do his policies seem to provide so many opportunities for them?
As The Daily Signal’s Mary Margaret Olohan notes: “Among full-time, year-round workers, the number of women increased by 1.6 million and the number of men increased by about 700,000 between 2017 and 2018.”
The median real income for female-headed households with no spouse rose 5.8% from 2017 to 2018. For married couples, there was no change. The poverty rate for female-led households shrank from 26.2% in 2017 to 24.9% in 2018.
OK, but surely, billionaire Trump hates the poor and his policies have been disastrous for them, right?
In fact, as the Census data show, the number of people living in poverty fell by 1.4 million people in 2018 alone, with the poverty rate dropping from 12.3% to 11.8%, its lowest since before the 2007 financial crisis. That decline was led by female-headed households, minority ones in particular, the most vulnerable of all.
Meanwhile, Department of Agriculture data show that 6.3 million Americans have fallen out of the food stamp program since Trump took office. The main reason: parents in poor families are getting jobs and are no longer eligible.
Critics might have a point about the shrinking middle class. There are indeed fewer Americans falling into that classification. But not for the reasons you might think.
As economist Mark J. Perry notes, the middle class is shrinking and has been for a long time. The reason: As the economy expands, more people have entered the high-income brackets than ever before in history.
Since 2007, the year before the financial crisis, the middle class — defined as those earning $35,000 to $100,000 in inflation-adjusted dollars — has fallen from 43% of the population to 41.7% in 2018.
A sign that the middle class is being “squeezed,” as the left likes to say? Hardly.
The share of those considered “poor” has also fallen, from 29.4% to 27.9% of the population.
Where did all the poor and middle class go? To the upper-income level. It swelled from 27.7% to 30.4%.
“Many prominent people like Paul Krugman and progressive politicians like Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren claim that American’s middle class has been declining, disappearing, collapsing, losing ground, vanished, stagnated, etc.,” Perry, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute recently wrote. “But the Census Bureau data on household income over time displayed above demonstrate conclusively that those assertions are incredibly and verifiably wrong.”
As for those at the bottom, a recent report by the group Just Facts found that the poorest 20% of Americans consume more goods and services than the average citizen does in most rich countries, including Europe.
As James D. Agresti of the Foundation for Economic Education put it, “In other words, if the U.S. ‘poor’ were a nation, it would be one of the world’s richest.”
The point here is, those trends have accelerated under Trump, data show.
Are these data surprising? Not when you consider that economists are almost unanimous in saying that the best antidote for poverty is a job.
Trump’s tax cuts and deregulation helped push economic and job growth up strongly after years of Obama-era stagnation.
That doesn’t mean every policy the White House puts forth has been good for the economy, as the raging debate over tariffs shows.
Still, as the old saying goes, “a rising tide lifts all boats.” That’s still true today. And for women and minorities, thanks to Trump’s policies and the economy’s ongoing expansion, the boats have never been higher.
Note to Readers: Issues & Insights is a new site launched by the seasoned journalists behind the legendary IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to use our decades of experience to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day.
We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we think our approach to commentary is sorely lacking both in today’s mainstream media and on the internet. If you like what you see, feel free to click the Tip Jar over on the right sidebar. And be sure to tell your friends!
There is a simple explanation: He isn’t.
But he is !!!!!
Really? Do you want to be in the middle of anything, other than a good party?
Last time I waste time reading this silly rag. I remember LImbaugh’s demise from conservatism to repubicanism (W Bush) to insanity (dotard). You’re just a bunch of trumpet blowing sycophants.
Encouraging facts. It could be coincidence. It could be the continuation of long term trends, or it could be that Trump has targeted these social groups with initiatives to attack the barriers that have been holding them back.
The article states: “Trump’s tax cuts and deregulation helped push economic and job growth up strongly.” It further states, “Still, as the old saying goes, “a rising tide lifts all boats.” That’s still true today. And for women and minorities, thanks to Trump’s policies and the economy’s ongoing expansion, the boats have never been higher.” Clearly, this statement and this article supports the coincidence argument.
It is an injustice to Trump if the article neglects to identify, or worse, to intentionally omit, specific programs or initiatives for minorities or women that created this change. So please, shows us in no uncertain terms, the policies and or initiatives that targeted women and minorities to shut the door any claims to circumstance.
Why do certain groups need special treatment? If the market is left to liberty, anybody is capable of thriving if willing to work hard and learn how to serve others for a profit. Trump loosening the grip of government isnt a coincidence its just better policy. Something the Left cant grasp.
The tariff situation is a positive, not a negative.